@BostonReview has published a handful of responses to Alex Gourevitch's essay last month on protest and free speech absolutism in the academy -- and it includes mine!
https://t.co/r0PrrtgnUW
I truly fucked up not doing my due diligence on Platner before offering high praise for his communication skills (on another platform). Enough was out there at the time that I should have been more cautious. Especially because I met adventurer dudes like him while reporting in Iraq. Deep respect to all who got it right.
I won't take down the bad post because that looks like hiding. But please know that I'm truly sorry I disappointed folks who trust me to be more careful. Most of all I'm sorry to the women who came forward only to be disbelieved and smeared. You deserved better and I feel absolutely gutted.
@Aaron_Good_@briebriejoy And if feel like one reason @briebriejoy keeps bringing it up is because she doesn’t ever feel like she gets a full and honest answer about it. I remember for example the Young Turks dude having a meltdown screaming about tactics versus strategy…
@Aaron_Good_@briebriejoy This is what I’ve been wondering. Have any of the anti-FTV people openly changed their minds? Like it’s not horrible to admit you were wrong, folks. We all make mistakes.
@BrianAGraham42 What Is History? is such a slam dunk masterpiece I actually feel relieved of any effort to convince these people. Like if that didn't settle the question then nothing will.
Are we really doing this again? 80+ years since E.H. Carr wrote What Is History, and practicing historians are still confusing the field with some kind of antiquarian noble dream.
How about I'd just like to know the answer to research questions without prespecifying the findings? And I'd like to read work by others who do that, too. I honestly don't care if the answer is liberal or conservative, but I don't want to read stuff where authors set out to prove something or criticize something.
@n_hold People falling back on the discredited creed of pure empiricism is equal parts hilarious and jaw-dropping. There is no bad argument that a certain configuration of politics cannot revive.
@Jerry_Ratcliffe@ashleytrubin@avitale@jgo34 Rigorous research is actually the bare minimum, not what makes history History. That always requires interpretation, which always means politics will be engaged in some way. Unless you are writing about something incredibly inconsequential.
My sister and I started a podcast about film & and TV about the past! Do you like history and/or film? OF COURSE YOU DO! Give us a follow and a listen! https://t.co/zXSxJoofWL
Thankfully we have created these magic robots to spare you the burden of thinking, writing, making music and art—leaving you to your true passions such as dishwashing, trash disposal, and diaper-changing which we are unfortunately unable to automate at this time
@n_hold Also, this basically posits that having any overarching idea of how to understand human societies is "lazy." There is something about the liberal mindset that equates explanation with stupidity and embraces chaos as clarity.