Rob Turvey

Jesus Christ is Lord.

[Dr Clare Craig ✝️ @ClareCraigPath]

We got there!
🐢
Now the final quarter...
🏅

[The Nowhere Photographer @thenowherephoto]

Favour please 🙏🙏

I’d love for every single person who supports me to quote post the post below

Not for me but for the uk

I honestly believe it could turn the tide of the conversation and wake up the sleeping masses of the uk

[Dr Clare Craig ✝️ @ClareCraigPath]

This was my first video explaining folic acid.

I started looking at it from the point of view of brain development.

The harms I have learned about since have only made me more determined to see an end to healthy people taking it.

[Dr Clare Craig ✝️ @ClareCraigPath]

Folic acid petitions is trending:

https://t.co/6DmS1JyUNQ

sign below

[Rob Turvey @Robintheforest]

@ClareCraigPath The same goes for @waitrose Duchy Organic. Utterly shameful!

[Rob Turvey @Robintheforest]

@RestoreBritain This is bad communication. What do you mean ?

[Dr Clare Craig ✝️ @ClareCraigPath]

Halfway.

Keep going.

[Dr Clare Craig ✝️ @ClareCraigPath]

It is always interesting to see what X decides to not put into my profile page.

This is one.

[Rob Turvey @Robintheforest]

@ClareCraigPath @waitrose. The voluntary inclusion of Folic acid in any product is deplorable. The addition of Folic acid into organic products is despicable and deceitful. I have been buying D Organic flour and recently discovered that it contains Folic acid. I buy Organic to AVOID chemicals

[Rob Turvey @Robintheforest]

@daveatherton The practice of foreign remittances of U.K. derived income including benefits should be ended or at least severely restricted, just as it used to be at one time

[Dr Clare Craig ✝️ @ClareCraigPath]

40,000

We will get there but we need to keep going.

https://t.co/XzpiIGIzT7

[Colin Brazier @ColinBrazierTV]

The values of Labour and the BBC are increasingly indivisible. Now Labour is shamelessly giving preferential treatment to a Corporation which actively campaigns against our way of life, established traditions and national identity.

My latest Friday monologue, available below.

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

The Manchester Model. What It Actually Looks Like Up Close.

Andy Burnham is asking the country to trust him with Downing Street on the strength of what he calls the Manchester Model. Eight years of integrated public services and progressive governance that he says Britain should adopt nationally. Before the country decides, it should know what that model actually produced.

Start with the money.

£578 million in public money was lent by Burnham's Greater Manchester Combined Authority to a single developer, Daren Whitaker of Renaker. A tribunal found that GMCA failed to obtain a statement of assets and liabilities from Whitaker before lending, exposing taxpayers to a risk the tribunal described as potentially wiping out the public funds. A meeting between a senior GMCA officer and Whitaker at which loan terms appear to have been agreed produced no minutes or notes. Court papers allege Renaker presented high profit figures to the GMCA when seeking loans and low profit figures to Manchester City Council when seeking exemption from affordable homes requirements. The Court of Appeal is considering judgment on whether the loans were lawful.

Out of 11,000 homes built with that public money, 503 are classed as affordable. Less than five percent. Whitaker's personal fortune grew from £140 million to £698 million during Burnham's mayoralty. The luxury towers were marketed to Chinese buy to let investors through Hong Kong estate agents. Hundreds of flats have been sold to Asian investors according to Telegraph analysis of Companies House filings.

Now the transparency.

In April 2026 the Information Commissioner issued a practice recommendation to the GMCA for failing to publish Freedom of Information compliance statistics. Greater Manchester Police, under Burnham's authority as Police and Crime Commissioner, was separately issued with an ICO enforcement notice for 850 overdue FOI requests, more than 800 over six months old. The oldest had been waiting two and a half years.

Now the transport flagship.

The Bee Network has absorbed a £30 council tax precept increase in two years to subsidise its operation. The £115 million Clean Air Zone was scrapped after £211 million in public funds was received and only £22.5 million returned. Burnham's own transport commissioner acknowledged the network remains twenty two years behind London. The board of Be.EV, the company holding the Bee Network's public EV charging contract, includes Burnham's wife, who joined the company six years into his mayoralty and was appointed to the board as his Westminster ambitions became increasingly visible.

Now the promises.

Burnham pledged to end rough sleeping by 2020. Rough sleeping rose. Today 18,000 people across Greater Manchester have no permanent address. He promised Platt Bridge a flood solution by 2018. The area flooded in 2015, 2021 and on New Year's Day 2025. The projected solution is now 2028. When asked on Question Time why he would not apologise, he said it was before his time. He became Mayor in 2017. The promise was made in 2018.

Now the politics.

Labour's candidate to replace Burnham as Mayor is Bev Craig, leader of Manchester City Council, the body that accepted Renaker's low profit figures and granted the affordable homes exemption. The mayoral by-election on 30 July will be fought under the supplementary vote system rushed through the Lords two days before Burnham's Makerfield victory, designed to consolidate left of centre second preferences and lock out Reform.

108 Labour councillors lost their seats in Greater Manchester in May's local elections. The region Burnham governed for eight years delivered the most devastating local election result in Labour's history.

This is the Manchester Model. These are its documented facts. The country is being asked to implement it nationally. It should read the small print first.

Bev Craig. Labour's candidate to replace Burnham. Leader of the council that granted Renaker's affordable homes exemption.

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

She Pledged Palestinian Freedom From A West Bank Pulpit. She Has Never Made That Pledge For Nigeria's Massacred Christians.

On Sunday morning Dame Sarah Mullally, the 106th Archbishop of Canterbury, stood in a church in Birzeit in the occupied West Bank and told the congregation she would use her role to seek the peace you desire and the freedom you deserve. It was a specific, named, actionable commitment. A promise from the senior Christian voice in Britain to one community in one conflict.

Search for an equivalent promise made to Nigeria's Christians and you will not find it.

In 2024 alone, over 4,000 Christians were killed in Nigeria, the majority by Islamist Fulani militia and Boko Haram affiliates. The Open Doors World Watch List, the most comprehensive annual survey of Christian persecution globally, documents severe persecution across more than 50 countries. Iraq's Christian population has collapsed from 1.5 million before 2003 to fewer than 250,000 today, one of the most complete destructions of an ancient Christian community in recorded history. The Coptic Christians of Egypt face sustained institutional discrimination and periodic massacres. Sub-Saharan Africa is experiencing what some researchers describe as a slow motion genocide of Christian communities, conducted largely by Islamist groups, largely in silence.

Dame Sarah has not made a five day pilgrimage to stand with any of them. She has not stood at a pulpit in Kaduna or Cairo or Kirkuk and pledged to use her role to seek the freedom they deserve. The Archbishop of York, Stephen Cottrell, used his Christmas Day sermon at York Minster to say that Israel had committed genocidal acts. Neither Archbishop has used that language about the groups killing Christians in their thousands across Africa and the Middle East.

That asymmetry is not accidental. It reflects the ideological framework the Church of England has absorbed so completely that it can no longer see it operating. The same progressive institutional culture documented across British policing, the NHS, the BBC and the Ministry of Justice has captured the Church of England too. Its moral grammar has been rewritten. Suffering that fits the framework gets named, visited and pledged to. Suffering that does not fit the framework gets a footnote in an inaugural address that mentions Myanmar and the Democratic Republic of Congo alongside Ukraine and Russia, carefully balancing the optics without committing to anything specific.

This matters because the Archbishop of Canterbury is not merely a religious figure. She is in law and in cultural memory the senior Christian voice in a nation whose institutions, laws, liberties and moral inheritance were built on Christian foundations. When that voice makes its most specific and most actionable commitment, it is not to the 4,000 Nigerian Christians killed last year. It is not to the last 250,000 Christians clinging on in Iraq. It is not to the Coptic families burying their dead in Egypt. It is to the community whose cause resonates most comfortably in the progressive institutional culture the Church now inhabits.

Justin Welby resigned over catastrophic safeguarding failures. Dame Sarah was installed while live safeguarding complaints against her remained unresolved. Abuse survivors called it a galling betrayal. The Church pressed ahead. The institution that could not pause a ceremony for its own survivors has found the moral clarity to make a specific political commitment from a West Bank pulpit within weeks of taking office.

The Church of England once stood for something that transcended politics. It spoke for the persecuted, the forgotten and the voiceless regardless of whether their cause was fashionable. It does not do that now. It speaks for those whose suffering fits the approved narrative and stays carefully silent about the rest.

Nigeria's Christians are still waiting. They will keep waiting.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Restore Britain has been labelled as ‘extremist’ by Zack Polanski, ‘racist’ by endless Labour MPs, ‘repulsive’ by Jeremy Corbyn and ‘neo-nazis’ by Reform.

Our immigration policy has certainly ruffled a few feathers. Take a read, and let me know if you think it’s as unacceptable as the British establishment wants you to believe...

Step number one, straightforward.

Illegal migrants gone. Every man, woman and child. Deported. I don’t care about the consequences. This is the most pressing issue, and a Restore Britain Government will tackle it with the enthusiasm it deserves.

We are the only party to lay out in excruciating detail exactly how we do it. 110+ policy pages of pure deportation joy.

Mass deportations. Real mass deportations. And we mean it.

Step two? Legal immigration.

Criminal migrants? Don’t even need to discuss. Gone. Day one.

If a migrant living in Britain can’t speak English, we will deport them.

How on earth can they contribute when they can’t speak English. They can’t, so they will be removed.

The only foreign language translation a Restore Britain Government will provide is the seatbelt instructions on their flight home.

Foreign nationals living in social housing? We will deport them.

British social housing should be for British families. Evidently, they can’t financially support themselves so they will be removed.

There is a pattern here.

If a foreign national is claiming benefits, they too will be removed.

Pay your way, and then some, or you will be sent packing.

Foreign Islamists spreading hate? We will remove them. Gladly. Those mosques found to be harbouring these extremists will be shut down, and those foreign nationals enabling it will also be removed.

And of course, moving on to the reason Farage tried to put me in prison. Because he thought my position was so very extreme...

If a Pakistani wife is aware that her husband has been gang-raping English children but fails to report it? She will be deported back to Pakistan. I hope her husband isn’t as fortunate.

Dual nationals involved in this filth will have their British citizenship stripped, and they will be removed.

Incoming immigration.

There will be significant net negative immigration - FAR more will leave than arrive. FAR more. Those who do will contribute and integrate, providing high skills. Spouses of British men and women from non-red list countries will be welcome - that is positive immigration and should be encouraged.

A Restore Britain Government will end immigration from Red List countries.

Somalia, Sudan, Pakistan, Eritrea. A full list is being drafted.

We will discriminate.

Immigration from Sudan is not the same as immigration from Australia.

OBVIOUSLY.

We will get called racist for saying that, but honestly I could not care less anymore.

Restore Britain is willing to do what needs to be done.

We will implement an immigration system that puts one group of people first.

The British people.

That is what a Restore Britain Government will do.

Without apology, compromise or backtracking.

[Rob Turvey @Robintheforest]

@KathyConWom @nadhimzahawi @Nigel_Farage This is a perfect display of what has been so rotten in British politics for so long and the arrogance is delivered with a smile as though he is some kind of virtuous hero.

[Rob Turvey @Robintheforest]

@GhorbaniiNiyak Shameful. Very similar to their coverage in Gaza/Israel. The BBC used to shine a light in dark places. Now it copies the darkness.

[Anna Lulis @annamlulis]

Not a “clump of cells,” a unique and valuable human being developing in the womb.

In awe of God’s creation.

[Rob Turvey @Robintheforest]

@AllisonPearson The Police eagerly pursued that ridiculous law, as your experience demonstrates. They choose to overlook other breaches of the law but pursued NCHIs. The police are the problem just as much as the daft law.

[Rob Turvey @Robintheforest]

@BigBrotherWatch But niqabs ( or whatever are the full face cover garments ) are ok?