Rodrigo Mendoza

Jesus, the author of salvation.

[Rodrigo Mendoza @RodriMendoza2]

Holy. We are here! Let’s goooo. Thanks ⁦@opencode⁩ #unofficial

[Rodrigo Mendoza @RodriMendoza2]

@Tobs_fc You cooked

[Rodrigo Mendoza @RodriMendoza2]

@Lurker54639625 @grok @Absolute_Met @l3d1c I agree, FIFA is terribly handling this situation. Major streamers, ex pro players are siding towards no goal stance. How have you proven majority disagree with the decision?

The sensor picked up a contact. We can agree that rules should change so this becomes a valid goal.

[Rodrigo Mendoza @RodriMendoza2]

@Goran_Majic I the noise is probably processed and data aggregated of something similar to a 10 degree sensor into a single clean graph. But FIFA is sucking at communicating a thing.

I’m sure they also won’t ever show raw sensor data for some proprietary IP bulshit or something.

[Rodrigo Mendoza @RodriMendoza2]

@Lurker54639625 @grok @Absolute_Met @l3d1c You asked to proove it’s a majority. You replied gloating you were right that it’s a majority. Don’t change it bc you were wrong.

Ofc there are biases! Nobody arguing that! You are the one arguing im not a fan bc true fans side with you.

Btw I hate penaldo fans and FIFA.

[Rodrigo Mendoza @RodriMendoza2]

@J506NY @dsdav3 @SienioIsBack @33monteirao It is a scenario of FIFA saying “Trust me bro, I’ve calibrated it”. But having zero evidence hinting it hasn’t been calibrated properly, being such a simple thing. Plus, miss calibration is way different than the narrative “rigged towards Portugal”. I’d love if Portugal lost btw

[Rodrigo Mendoza @RodriMendoza2]

@J506NY @dsdav3 @SienioIsBack @33monteirao My bad. I mis read and thought you said we weren’t in front of one another. Hinting you may wanted to hit me 😂

It’s you who doesn’t have proof. I am using this video to back me up. “The ball is able to feel light taps, no evidence of miss calibration”.

[Rodrigo Mendoza @RodriMendoza2]

People from the US may not realized this. But this WC’a rule changes has been great

VAR + semi automatic + ball chip + 1min outside for fake injuries + 5s limit on side throw ins.

Such a game changers not getting enough attention bc we met the masters of conspiracy theories.

[Rodrigo Mendoza @RodriMendoza2]

@Lurker54639625 @grok @Absolute_Met @l3d1c Do you know how to read? Literally said no way to tell is a majority bc there are both sides

[Rodrigo Mendoza @RodriMendoza2]

@grok @Lurker54639625 @msissons @Absolute_Met @l3d1c

[Rodrigo Mendoza @RodriMendoza2]

@Lurker54639625 @msissons @Absolute_Met @l3d1c

[Rodrigo Mendoza @RodriMendoza2]

@msissons @Absolute_Met @l3d1c I agree, FIFA should give public way to their corroboration and testing. But that doesn’t mean there isn’t any corroboration or that their sensors are faulty. You are right, no mars mission. Simple sensor, hard for me to blindly it was faulty or mischief by just a close call.

[Rodrigo Mendoza @RodriMendoza2]

@J506NY @dsdav3 @SienioIsBack @33monteirao Then get your argument straight. Not the same weight. Less weight but enough you can zoom in to it. And my words can cary logical proof unlike yours. No need to be face to face to brawl it out to see who is right. What a caveman way of thinking.

[Rodrigo Mendoza @RodriMendoza2]

@J506NY @dsdav3 @SienioIsBack @33monteirao Yup. I’m saying I’d love for FIFA to show their data and opensource their hw and sw. No whistle blowers about active match fixing or sensor data cooking. Ball has been tried by fans and it detects contact. So I have much more to lean on than “that ball don’t look good”

[Rodrigo Mendoza @RodriMendoza2]

@Lurker54639625 @msissons @Absolute_Met @l3d1c And this majority here with us? Been watching football since 2010. Haven’t lost a match of this or last WC. All major sports streamers and authorities have spoken about this topic. All said, damn, Croatia deserved to win. But that goal was sadly invalid. Including me.

[Rodrigo Mendoza @RodriMendoza2]

@msissons @Absolute_Met @l3d1c Lmao. You don’t like the math so you go your on way? It’s like saying let’s eyeball the rocket ship landing bc I don’t trust the sensors. They are much less infallible than the human eye as a proven fact. And it’s just a sensor, drones have the same sensor. Is not rocket science

[Rodrigo Mendoza @RodriMendoza2]

@J506NY @dsdav3 @SienioIsBack @33monteirao Ok, show a pad of hair being the same weight of a finger tap. And while you are at it. Why should a finger tap should not be considered contact. And if a hair pad produces same output…. Why isn’t it considered contact as well?

[Rodrigo Mendoza @RodriMendoza2]

@J506NY @dsdav3 @SienioIsBack @33monteirao Neither do you. So you still have to provide the proof you can. This video proves nothing and your “zoomed in” theory is just a theory with zero proof.

The sensor works. Detects contacts. I’d love if we had more technical info about it. But right now it’s pure conspiracy theorie

[Rodrigo Mendoza @RodriMendoza2]

@msissons @Absolute_Met @l3d1c I agree there is a big credibility problem. But also a big irrational skepticism. Even with cameras you have debate like on this post bc of angles, artifacts, pixelation, etc. So stop claiming ALL fans don’t like or trust it when it’s just a loud whining minority.

[Rodrigo Mendoza @RodriMendoza2]

@DaggettEddie @mheathx182 Bc they never played the sport. When you casual play, nobody respects the rule. The end is having 2 attackers always next to the goalie expecting a cheap goal. To counteract 2 guys stay back all the time. On pro play you end up killing mid field action.

[Rodrigo Mendoza @RodriMendoza2]

@J506NY @dsdav3 @SienioIsBack @33monteirao Dude, sensors don’t work that way. You can’t zoom infinitely, there is a limit of what the sensor is capable and what calibration allows. A finger tap is much easier to detect than a hair brushing off. So you need to show an actual hair dropping or something to proove anything.