"powerful men in history, who often could arrange to have any sort of sex life they wanted, typically had both one high-quality mate and a series of other sex partners on the side (e.g., the king would have a queen; but he would also have various concubines and mistresses)."
Pon's is destroying every other launchpad and taking 70%+ marketshare across all launchpads, it's safe to say we're in a Pondemic.
Introducing $Pondemic , a movement away from all the pump and dumps and towards community and conviction instead.
Thanks to Pons new update $Pondemic is paired with Pfizer stock and can properly run
0x1abc4eb79e3f209ebde6b3c591f6322bffea1e77
♦️Myron says you shouldn’t be taking vacations until you’re making $100K a year and have your first real estate property!😲🫣
“You n*ggas over here making $50K per year taking vacations, for what!? That’s why you’re poor!”
This isn’t a coin.
It’s a virus.
One holder becomes ten.
Ten becomes a thousand.
If you’re reading this, you’re already exposed.
The pondemic is live.
No cure.
Only contagion.
Paired with Pfizer.
$CA: 0x1abc4eb79e3f209ebde6b3c591f6322bffea1e77
Let’s go viral.
And shortly after, the bottom was formed for bitcoin:native.
At this point, the main argument against $57K being the cycle low is simply seasonality and historical price action fractals.
That's literally it.
Because almost every other metric is pointing in the opposite direction, suggesting that $57K was, in fact, the cycle low.
But you should know by now, markets don't repeat forever. At some point, BTC will do something it has never done before.
And when that shift happens, those relying purely on historical patterns will be the last to adapt.
Your biggest issue is that you're trying to make better decisions when you should instead be making better responses. It sounds awkward, but it's rather simple: according to game theory, practically everything is a game. In these games, you don't make decisions at all. They're called responses instead. That's because everything is dynamic. When you're making a decision, you're asking, "What is the next step right now?" which is shortsighted. When you're responding, you're thinking, "How does this impact my position, and could it come back to bite me?" This is a seemingly irrelevant shift that thoroughly changes how you think. Responding beats deciding every time.
Game theory explains why working harder inside a broken system is always the worst response to that system. That's because a system is never truly broken. It's just producing exactly the outcomes its own incentive structures were designed to produce, whether intentional or not. Working harder inside this system increases your output in the payoff matrix, but it simply won't change the actual structure of the system's matrix. Thus, the correct response is not more effort. Instead, you must aim to identify whose interests the current structure serves and position yourself in favor of those interests rather than against them. Change the game, or play the game that is actually being played. Either way, you must stop optimizing for the game you wish it to be and start acting realistically.
Easily the best narrative on the entire Pons platform. Unipcs top 2 conviction bags this cycle are $Pons and $Useless,
$Pontless makes so much sense that it's pontless to explain it if you dont get it
0x06003b4e0d3d0438f3dccbdd72e01857b7dd70b7
. @theunipcs top 2 conviction plays for this bull cycle are Pons and Useless coin, with Pons at a new ath of 150mil it only makes sense for Pon's/RH to have their own variant of Useless coin, introducing Pontless coin because it's all Pontless in the end
0x06003b4e0d3d0438f3dccbdd72e01857b7dd70b7
People called me crazy at $3M. Then they called me insane at $80M.
People called me crazy at $10M. Then they called me insane at $90M.
People called me crazy at $30M. They’ll call me insane at $150M.
They’ll call me crazy at $100M. Then insane at $500M.
Crazy at $250M. Insane at $1B.
And the cycle will continue until CATE flips DOGE.
Slowly, then all at once. 💛🐈