@EggOnTheRice@savage_tw1949 para. 10(e) by setting non-zero catch limits for Antarctic minke, fin and humpback whales. The Court also found violations of paras. 10(d) and 7(b). I.C.J. Reports 2014, p. 226, para. 247. (2/2)
https://t.co/Tvjv21xduk
@EggOnTheRice@savage_tw1949 ICRW Article VIII(1) and Schedule paras. 7(b), 10(d), 10(e). In Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan), the ICJ held by 12 votes to 4 that Japan’s JARPA II permits did not qualify for the scientific-research exemption under Article VIII(1), and that Japan violated (1/2)