@plantblazer If the plane of the earth were vast, and non-local, the earth would block the stars.
Pretty basic stuff.
Also, I can substantiate. You're sub-50 IQ.
https://t.co/4BlPPZ6WZl
To date, JRR Tolkien has provided a more detailed explanation for his fantasy earth than flat earth has.
Behold! Literally the most detailed map of flat earth in existence.
Feel free to provide your own if you disagree.
@plantblazer I can have an eye level, and look at the ground. Nothing violated
Stars aren't below the surface because the bottom paradigm is retarded. There's no vast flat surface.
They would be.... if earth were flat. It's pointing out the ridiculous spasticity of flat earth, yes.
@plantblazer The text is at eye level, dip shit.
There is a human depicted. The assumption is anyone with an IQ in the double digits will know that is eye level (altitude of eye).
The goal wasn't to make it retard proof, it was to prove you're a retard and it worked.
@plantblazer Flat earth is retarded, yes.
If I were a flat earther, I would be a retard, yes.
Because a non-local flat plane does not allow a dip angle to celestial objects.
It's a debunk of retard flat earth paradigm. Duh.
https://t.co/L1vm5dmCuC
@plantblazer Read the label you illiterate.
"Below eye level" text is AT eye level.
The stars are above the dip angle. So that is NOT the eye level.
Holy Hell you have a sub-60 IQ.
@plantblazer Read the label, you illiterate.
"Below eye level".
Where are the stars? Above the dip angle line?
Clearly not eye level.
Holy hell you have a sub-60 IQ.
@_free_f0rever_@plantblazer You made up some stuff in your echo chamber. It's not a deflection, is dismissal of anti-scientific fluff.
The results of observation match the globe model. Saying 'require' seems like begging the question is your go-to methodology.
@_free_f0rever_@plantblazer So you believe a Tolkienology. We knew that.
No, I do not observe a motionless horizontal expanse when measurement enters the chat.
Any efforts to do so end up distorted and un-navigable.
Unless you have something more accurate... the globe is the default observation.
@plantblazer No I don't you idiot.
Eye level and dip angle are different.
The dip angle's existence debunks flat earth.
We've been over this.
https://t.co/kjEmibTAVK
@_free_f0rever_@plantblazer I am so convinced by your argument I'd love to see your model for consideration.
I'll donate 100 of any sensible model you provide to a local school.
Please provide it.
@IfbShxwn@PBJ4Supper@TheGlobeIsDead You're not actually curious. You'll just run back to the ficitonal flat earth tolkienology.
But knock yourself out.
https://t.co/pyVWWAUOwN