@DrChrisCombs Yes, i think the incompressibility’s unphysical demands guaranteed there would be failure cases. My question is if we make the incompressibility physical with a speed limit based on the speed of sound through the medium, would it be a solution for all time?
@skdh@JonesDanny@DanielWhiteson And this is where we have to look for new physics. Universal energy conservation must be accounted for or strong disclaimers of effective model limitations must be made. This is not an area for continued hand-waving.. it where work must be done and assumtions revealed.
@IsabellaMWeber@VergaraLautaro Start w/out the fear tactics like anti-fascist propaganda. Then discuss how hyperglobalization was instituted haphazardly as the politicians aligned with the MNCs and ignored just the simpliest models of what happens to labor markets and safety nets. It’s not so complicated.
@skdh@jessesingal The thing is, if socialism can ever work (I don’t believe it can long-term) it would require far harder work than capitalism. Post-Modernity and the self-sacrifice socialism will demand are not compatible.
@Hesamation@VergaraLautaro NS as written assumes FTL communications by it incompressibility demands. Its not physically precise enough.. but works fine in real world applications. Theoretically, the problem’s short comings are obvious.
@bigten NCAA can’t use tenths of seconds. If the clock says :00 its over. The use of the extra clock to even find the 1/10th of a second is in violation of the rules.
@Fermilab I don’t think there’s enough of it to account for what effective modeling proposes and why would it clump in rings around galaxies? Why would any “dark’ mass clump in rings around galaxies?
@elonmusk@skdh@ericweinstein Sadly, the writing on the wall is clear. Institutional physics will not exist as we know it in a decade. AI labs and robotic assisted researchers will dominate the field. Universities as we know them now may hold out a bit longer due to nostalgia, but its a matter of time.
@elonmusk@IAI_TV Got to call you out based on you own public standards. First-principles reasoning means minimizing assumptions. Planck cubes introduces both a preferred length and a lattice before any derivation. Unless those emerge from deeper principles, they’re inputs, not explanations.
@skdh Entropy is also a quantum process and most likely tied to the g well in which it presides as demonstrated with the empty field/sarsely dense field… the flow. Its seems circular without a clear genesis. Probably just a me thing.
@skdh 5.6 audited my previous work and cleared up the epistemology that previous models convoluted with the SM. It’s really good… it still drifts… its interesting seeing it evolve.
@martinmbauer Physics novelty with an AI is so full of pitfalls… hallcination, convention smuggling, its really easy to embarrass yourself. But, getting embarrassed provides a choice, keep refining, better journaling and digging or give up. I suppose thats not limited to AI interface.
@QualiaQuanta@JoelMichalowitz The locked geometry is TQ’s hybrid Gaussian exponential shell: a collapse radius of 0.447 fm, a Gaussian width of 0.10 fm, and a tail length of 1.43 fm. Those values come from proton lock in and curvature consistency.
@QualiaQuanta@JoelMichalowitz They don’t mean anything? They ontologically describe collapse of coherant quanta rather precisly with a locked in geometry. A timeless/homogenous monism with the avg mass density of the universe decayed, collapsed and then bang… for the philosopher in you.
@QualiaQuanta@JoelMichalowitz If the predictions fail, the framework fails. Ill either lick my wounds and pout back to my ontology or keep trying to falsify it. But, I have to do it cleanly, not becuase of my lackings. Its not easy.
Falsification ledger. https://t.co/RrXqdm2ZV5
@QualiaQuanta@JoelMichalowitz Locked in geometry. Gaussean core with exponential tail. All shells and tails. Komar calibrated to the proton mass. It works as far as I can tell. It may fail tomorrow.. very falsifiable and lots of predictions that will have data soon.