Rovac

Trader from Russia

[Rovac @RovacCS]

@tzu_kanon @waral555 @0xDK0 @0xDinoCrypto It's actually how polymarket works with dispute. Your first day on Polymarket?

[Rovac @RovacCS]

@jtrader It don't happend

https://t.co/CSPFiK5ex6

[Rovac @RovacCS]

POLYMARKET NEED TO PAY OUT $300M to the gamblers speculators who bought shares at $0.003 just to keep them on its market, only to never make that money back in the future because in that case every gambler would have to spend $3k on fees (100k gamblers).

Or even better, just go ahead and shave the evil UMA manipulators and the whales who are buying up No shares basically a global redistribution of wealth to the proletariat.

Is that really how the fuck you imagine this?

[Rovac @RovacCS]

@tzu_kanon @waral555 @0xDK0 @0xDinoCrypto Because it in disputed bro...

[Rovac @RovacCS]

@tzu_kanon @waral555 @0xDK0 @0xDinoCrypto Because it's how markets on Polymarket works, you have dispute window

Also you can buy No now for 10m$)

[Rovac @RovacCS]

@MadMaxx_eth Because payout for Yes never happend

https://t.co/CSPFiK5ex6

[Rovac @RovacCS]

POLYMARKET NEED TO PAY OUT $300M to the gamblers speculators who bought shares at $0.003 just to keep them on its market, only to never make that money back in the future because in that case every gambler would have to spend $3k on fees (100k gamblers).

Or even better, just go ahead and shave the evil UMA manipulators and the whales who are buying up No shares basically a global redistribution of wealth to the proletariat.

Is that really how the fuck you imagine this?

[Rovac @RovacCS]

@MightyDylanK @Polymarket You think this happend?

https://t.co/CSPFiK5ex6

[Rovac @RovacCS]

POLYMARKET NEED TO PAY OUT $300M to the gamblers speculators who bought shares at $0.003 just to keep them on its market, only to never make that money back in the future because in that case every gambler would have to spend $3k on fees (100k gamblers).

Or even better, just go ahead and shave the evil UMA manipulators and the whales who are buying up No shares basically a global redistribution of wealth to the proletariat.

Is that really how the fuck you imagine this?

[Rovac @RovacCS]

POLYMARKET NEED TO PAY OUT $300M to the gamblers speculators who bought shares at $0.003 just to keep them on its market, only to never make that money back in the future because in that case every gambler would have to spend $3k on fees (100k gamblers).

Or even better, just go ahead and shave the evil UMA manipulators and the whales who are buying up No shares basically a global redistribution of wealth to the proletariat.

Is that really how the fuck you imagine this?

[Rovac @RovacCS]

@RichLassiterMD @0xDinoCrypto You make a bet before 31? Actually no

[Rovac @RovacCS]

@0xDinoCrypto Even if you win in court, they’ll more likely get fined than be forced to pay $100 million to gamblers. Accept it and move on

[Rovac @RovacCS]

The fairest decision on Polymarket’s side would be to resolve the market as No, but compensate those who held positions before May 31, 11:59 PM, because people genuinely bet on this happening

As for the speculators who bought shares after the market had effectively ended, their accounts should be banned, because they weren’t originally betting on the event happening and are now squealing like stuck pigs

[Rovac @RovacCS]

@0xPhaed @0xDinoCrypto 100%😂

[Rovac @RovacCS]

@0xPhaed @0xDinoCrypto But he is not investor in business, he is fucking gambler

[Rovac @RovacCS]

@Satgod_ @0xDinoCrypto Same, Polymarket was banned on UK

[Rovac @RovacCS]

@0xDinoCrypto look like this ngl

[Rovac @RovacCS]

@CarOnPolymarket It was a mistake to publish a post like this. Now a crowd of retards will jump on it and, will be trying to prove that “Yes” is the only correct answer😂

[Rovac @RovacCS]

@vbm_177 @huyrobotics @0xDinoCrypto Cry little baby😂

[Rovac @RovacCS]

@TheBrownGentYT @waral555 @0xDK0 @0xDinoCrypto Bro, it's just ragebaiting😂

I don't care if some retards lose money

[Rovac @RovacCS]

@huyrobotics @0xDinoCrypto Hearing that from someone with an extra chromosome

[Rovac @RovacCS]

At the time the market closed, there was no information indicating that MSTR had sold any Bitcoin. In other words, people who bought “No” based on the information available at that moment had no way of knowing that such a sale had occurred.

Any “Yes” purchases made on June 1 were purely speculative. Resolving the market in favor of “Yes” would be unfair to those who bought “No” immediately after the market closed, relying on the information that was publicly available at the time.

It would also create a dangerous precedent whereby markets with a defined expiration date could remain unresolved for days or even weeks simply because confirmation of an event might emerge later. That outcome would be far worse and would undermine trust not only in this market but in all markets with similar resolution criteria.