POLYMARKET NEED TO PAY OUT $300M to the gamblers speculators who bought shares at $0.003 just to keep them on its market, only to never make that money back in the future because in that case every gambler would have to spend $3k on fees (100k gamblers).
Or even better, just go ahead and shave the evil UMA manipulators and the whales who are buying up No shares basically a global redistribution of wealth to the proletariat.
Is that really how the fuck you imagine this?
POLYMARKET NEED TO PAY OUT $300M to the gamblers speculators who bought shares at $0.003 just to keep them on its market, only to never make that money back in the future because in that case every gambler would have to spend $3k on fees (100k gamblers).
Or even better, just go ahead and shave the evil UMA manipulators and the whales who are buying up No shares basically a global redistribution of wealth to the proletariat.
Is that really how the fuck you imagine this?
POLYMARKET NEED TO PAY OUT $300M to the gamblers speculators who bought shares at $0.003 just to keep them on its market, only to never make that money back in the future because in that case every gambler would have to spend $3k on fees (100k gamblers).
Or even better, just go ahead and shave the evil UMA manipulators and the whales who are buying up No shares basically a global redistribution of wealth to the proletariat.
Is that really how the fuck you imagine this?
POLYMARKET NEED TO PAY OUT $300M to the gamblers speculators who bought shares at $0.003 just to keep them on its market, only to never make that money back in the future because in that case every gambler would have to spend $3k on fees (100k gamblers).
Or even better, just go ahead and shave the evil UMA manipulators and the whales who are buying up No shares basically a global redistribution of wealth to the proletariat.
Is that really how the fuck you imagine this?
The fairest decision on Polymarket’s side would be to resolve the market as No, but compensate those who held positions before May 31, 11:59 PM, because people genuinely bet on this happening
As for the speculators who bought shares after the market had effectively ended, their accounts should be banned, because they weren’t originally betting on the event happening and are now squealing like stuck pigs
@CarOnPolymarket It was a mistake to publish a post like this. Now a crowd of retards will jump on it and, will be trying to prove that “Yes” is the only correct answer😂
At the time the market closed, there was no information indicating that MSTR had sold any Bitcoin. In other words, people who bought “No” based on the information available at that moment had no way of knowing that such a sale had occurred.
Any “Yes” purchases made on June 1 were purely speculative. Resolving the market in favor of “Yes” would be unfair to those who bought “No” immediately after the market closed, relying on the information that was publicly available at the time.
It would also create a dangerous precedent whereby markets with a defined expiration date could remain unresolved for days or even weeks simply because confirmation of an event might emerge later. That outcome would be far worse and would undermine trust not only in this market but in all markets with similar resolution criteria.