@mtracey When is looks like fraud such as the 2020 election where counting stopped only in battleground states or California where it looks like fraud due to delay... we can assume fraud because no one is held accountable.
@Big_Papa81@jessmargera House did not the senate - no signature by the president - how would you know what's better or worse, you don't know how government works
@mehdirhasan As you know - all BS lawfare - juries full of Trump haters in NY. Impeachment were not even based on anything credible - you voted for a man in Biden who extorted Ukraine on video.
We gave up on “civility” when you tried to stage a literal coup via the “Trump/Russia Collusion” hoax.
We abandoned “comity” when you decided that serial impeachments based on lies and fables were your preferred method of thwarting the Constitutional will of the American electorate.
We decided against “collegiality” after you decided it was better to fabricate criminal charges to defeat your opponents than it was to try and defeat them at the ballot box.
We threw out pretensions of “courtesy” the one-zillionth time you called us “Nazis” while your own candidates sport SS Totenkopf tattoos.
We play by your rules now, Democrats.
Deal with it.
(You too, Mike Pence.)
The E. Jean Carroll case against President Trump is one of the strangest civil cases in American history. The foundational problem is this: Carroll could not identify when the alleged incident occurred — not even the year with any precision.
That should have killed the case as dead as a skunk on the road right there.
Without a temporal anchor, no defendant — regardless of guilt or innocence — can mount an alibi defense. Trump, who has maintained detailed calendars and staff records for decades, was denied the most basic tool of self-defense: the ability to establish where he was. That is not a technicality. It is a due process violation at the constitutional level.
Then Carroll produced the one piece of physical evidence she claimed corroborated her account — the dress she wore during the alleged incident. It was subsequently established that the dress was designed after the incident could have occurred. The sole corroborating evidence falsified her timeline.
The case proceeded anyway.
The resulting verdict was then weaponized in a defamation suit — where Trump was held liable for denying the allegation, while being procedurally barred from defending against it, because it was already "proven" in another court, regardless how flawed the procedure was. He was punished, in effect, for asserting his own innocence.
Compounding everything: coordinated professional and physical threats so thoroughly intimidated the legal community that attorneys refused these cases regardless of available fees. When you systematically destroy a defendant's ability to retain counsel of choice, you forfeit the right to a legitimate verdict.
An allegation is not evidence. Process without substance is not law. And a verdict produced under these conditions carries no legitimate authority — whatever its formal status.
Not only is it the right move to investigate Carroll, but every other person involved as well. Trump is owed serious damages here, and there may be a few people who belong in prison for their roles in the case.
This is actually a common tactic, when used by people with bad intentions and malice afore thought.
The same thing was done during Christine Blasé Fords testimony against Kavanaugh.
So the women are carefully coached…
“DON’T GIVE A DATE! NO SPECIFIC DATE, HONEY! If you give a specific date, he might have some evidence he was elsewhere!!”
The fact they were able to actually ram this through, and reach a verdict is indicative of how corrupt the system is that Hoffman was using.
@RubenGallego Dont lie - that guy will not get money - its all of the peaceful demonstraters who's lives were ruined - the guy you show was probably an FBI informant.
@SenatorHick Tina Peters was proving election fraud and was thrown in jail for it. Dems have such bad ideas that they have to cheat to win. Mail in ballots are the key to Dem harvested votes. Not legit votes
@JoaquinCastrotx Sounds like another BS made up liberal sob story - these stories always turn out to be false or there is another part of the story that explains it.