@AlexisKat6@anonymasslawyer@HenryBl58377009 their "advanced digital equipment" is the same that most state/local investigatory bodies have. Most federal cases specifically use Cellebrite, in fact.
going to Cellebrite directly to help clarify things is pretty much the best you can do to get an authoritative answer.
@anonymasslawyer@AlexisKat6@HenryBl58377009 also, the FBI doesn't have some secret propriety software to better-examine phones. They use tools like Cellebrite like everyone else. They wouldn't be able to do anything differently.
@GIJossy you would be able to see what iCloud accounts are linked, but this was a physical extraction, so it wasn't providing data from iCloud backups themselves.
@GIJossy start time. It's all an automatic process by GrayKey. once it's complete, you get a ZIP file as the full image of the phone.
This was provided per Notice of Discovery VIII. But we're unlikely to see full extractions publicly for privacy reasons.
@GeauxTiger66@factsdontlie10 Lol I posted the exact quote you’re showing and fkr’s liked it without realizing what I was posting. They’re really that dumb.
@Dan_Donovan_17 In trial 2, Jessica Hyde had extensive testimony about this verification. She even went above and beyond to inspect the properties of the PDF of the GrayKey progress report to confirm it.
Realistically, this is just for checking against data loss. But still no manipulation.
@factsdontlie10 the exact quote of what he said he's showing here:
"At two minutes after 6am, and 41 seconds, there was a twelve minute period, and twenty seconds, where 417 doppler checks were conducted. The 417th doppler check showed a pocket state cleared event at 6:15:01"
@suspiciousauce@mabbe_8 you're talking about something that would've been stated hours later, while ignoring that she was making similar statements before she even found him and could have had such a moment.
What if.. hear me out.. your understanding of the latter statement is just wrong.
@suspiciousauce@mabbe_8 Going “idk what happened” or “I don’t remember anything” is understandable and a lot less specific than suggesting she may have hit him with her car. This has to be one of the most ridiculous ideas in all of true crime conspiracy theories.
@suspiciousauce@mabbe_8 That’s a really specific memory to just happen to be bringing up. So yeah it’s a real question you should think about for once.
@suspiciousauce@mabbe_8 How is that a trauma response lol
Also wondering how it’s a trauma response to be questioning if you hit him before you even find him or have any idea that he’s on the side of the road
Yes you are either naive or purposefully misleading yourself.