D Rubes 🧑‍🍳 🔋

[Gad Saad @GadSaad]

Correct. I’ve predicted this for several decades now.

[Ofer Binshtok - Kafir - עופר בינשטוק @Ofer_binshtok]

As an expert on Islam, I state: The U.S. is finished. It has no idea at all that this is coming for it, and it has zero tools to defend itself. On the contrary, the tools it does have will be turned against it to destroy it. Islam will wipe it out. It will be brutal, and far worse than anything happening in Western Europe.

The haters of Israel and the Jews in America will pay a heavy price for the elections and the side they chose. So will their children and grandchildren, with compound interest collected by members of the Islamic Ummah. They will tear down the democratic system and the Constitution by using the tools of democracy and the Constitution itself, while shaking the foundations of American existence in ways that have not happened since independence. It will be devastating.

The U.S. will slide into a civil war that will make the wars in Syria and Iraq look like child's play. This is not a maybe. It will happen for sure.

[D Rubes 🧑‍🍳 🔋 @RubesofD]

Did I get that right or wrong?

[D Rubes 🧑‍🍳 🔋 @RubesofD]

Republicans do not define people based on skin color.

Democrats do define people based on skin color.

Who is racist?

[Wall Street Apes @WallStreetApes]

This is absolutely insane

Calley Means exposes under Biden, Democrats came up with nutrition guidelines called “Health equity”

This means Democrat’s HHS would recommend junk food because healthy food was “racist” because it was expensive

This is real

“President Biden's team that gave us the initial recommendations that we were supposed to rubber stamp, we've thrown them in the trash.

They said the number one prism for the dietary guidelines under President Biden, what we were supposed to rubber stamp, was health equity.

What does that mean?

That means that we should just recommend cheap, crappy food because it's cheaper, because there's health equity disparities, that it's actually racist to recommend whole, healthy food.

The equity lens, the affordability lens has infiltrated into the science when the nutrition guidelines should just be recommending what is the best possible food to eat.

It's not the job of the nutrition guidelines to set food prices.”

“For decades, we've been living under the thumb of nutrition guidelines where 95% of advisors were paid for by food companies.”

[D Rubes 🧑‍🍳 🔋 @RubesofD]

@CinemaTweets1 It was soooo good. Well done.

[RedWave Press @RedWavePress]

Ana Navarro: “People are not going to be able to afford their insurance. I don’t even think with subsidies they’re going to be able to afford the premiums that are hiking up 100, 200, 300%.”

Brianna Lyman: “Wasn’t Obamcare supposed to fix that?”

Scott Jennings: “Affordable Care Act. Affordable was the first word.”

NUKED!

[Dinesh D'Souza @DineshDSouza]

Evidently Harvard does not believe her research is quite so path-breaking or it would dip into its $50 billion endowment and fund her itself.

[Whole Mars Catalog @wholemars]

That monkey didn’t just hoard bananas — he grew a lot of new ones for everyone, and gave away far more than he kept.

And these were entirely new bananas, flavors the other monkeys have never experienced before. They really loved it.

[Jason Cohen 🇺🇸 @JasonJournoDC]

🚨NEW: Bill Maher, Cheryl Hines *RAIL AGAINST* Democrats over "HOW MEAN" they are🚨

HINES: “The Republicans have been very kind to me from the beginning. Even ... when Bobby was running as a Democrat, they weren’t mean. And they never have been. And I can’t say that for the Democrats.”

MAHER: “I agree. And it’s sad because it’s not the Democrats we grew up with ... I’m not going to pretend I don’t notice how different they are. How mean they’ve become.”

HINES: "Very mean."

@DailyCaller

[Jeff Lutz 🔋 @thejefflutz]

It’s should not be ok that a program signed into law 15yrs ago still requires massive annual government subsidies to stay afloat while gross premiums have doubled.
The government is not good at rooting out costs, corruption, and getting to true core should-costs for medical products and services. All this is a massive transference of taxpayer dollars to insurance companies , now want $3T over the next 10yrs.
Meanwhile no one is figuring out how to drive costs down when the spending pipe is wide open and flowing… no solution from either side but neither should be taking a moral high ground either

[Basil the Great @BasilTheGreat]

🚨BREAKING: BBC TO APOLOGISE FOR BROADCASTING DOCTORED TRUMP SPEECH

Trump threatened retaliation
The BBC were terrified

They've been caught out
The British state broadcaster
Absolutely appalling
The BBC must be defunded

[Jeff Lutz 🔋 @thejefflutz]

@TimothyDSnyder There is no $1T today. He has to create $7T additional market capitalization first. That is millions of jobs for people. Don’t be naive or peddling dumb one-liners…

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

You are a taker, not a maker. All you’ve done your whole life is take from the makers of the world.

The zero-sum mindset you have is at the root of so much evil. Once you realize that civilization is not zero-sum and that it is about making far more than one consumes, then it becomes obvious that the path to prosperity for all is just let the makers make.

Regarding Tesla, the reality is that I have been given nothing.

However, if I lead Tesla to become the most valuable company in the world by far and it stays that way for 5 years, shareholders voted to award me 12% of what is built. Anyone who wants to come along for the ride can buy Tesla stock.

If Tesla “merely” becomes a $1.999 trillion dollar company, I get nothing. This is a great deal for shareholders, which is why they voted so overwhelmingly to approve this, for which I am immensely grateful.

And they did so by a margin far more than you won your political seat.

[D Rubes 🧑‍🍳 🔋 @RubesofD]

@MarioNawfal "Every person gains a tireless partner dedicated to their flourishing." 🔥well said

[Mario Nawfal @MarioNawfal]

EVEN THE POPE COULDN'T STOP THE FUTURE

Pope Leo XIV condemning Elon's trillion dollar package reveals everything wrong with institutional thinking.

The Vatican, sitting atop centuries of accumulated wealth, lectures about excessive compensation while Elon builds the infrastructure to eliminate human suffering through abundance.

Norway's oil fund, enriched by fossil fuels, votes against the man electrifying transportation.

The irony writes itself.

Ron Baron understood what the Pope didn't: this isn't about enriching one person but securing humanity's technological guardian.

Elon explicitly stated his discomfort building robot armies without influence.

Would critics prefer these capabilities controlled by committees who measure progress in quarterly earnings?

The Delaware judge who called the original package excessive fundamentally misunderstands that extraordinary achievements require extraordinary incentives.

Twenty million vehicles. One million robots. Eight trillion dollar valuation.

These aren't just metrics; they're humanity's escape velocity from scarcity.

The seventy-five percent who voted yes weren't blessing greed.

They were choosing civilization's survival over institutional comfort.

Source: @elonmusk / Yahoo

[D Rubes 🧑‍🍳 🔋 @RubesofD]

@XaviercMiller 💯

[X @XaviercMiller]

Here’s what I think will happen in NYC under Mahdami.

The free buses and government grocery stores won’t happen, they never do. They sound good during campaigns, but collapse under basic math. You can’t run a city on ideas that cost billions and produce no revenue.

The only way to make housing affordable is to build more housing. The free market lowers prices, not regulation. Every time politicians try to control rent or force affordability by decree, developers stop building and landlords stop maintaining. Supply dries up, the quality collapses, and the few properties that remain skyrocket in price.

Once landlords can’t make a profit, they sell, lose properties, or walk away. Eventually, the government takes over.

Taxes will rise to pay for the promises, and the middle class will be the ones shouldering the burden. The rich will relocate, the poor will depend on subsidies, and the productive class will be squeezed from both sides.

Thriving businesses are the foundation of any thriving city. When they leave, everything else follows, jobs, schools, grocery stores, stability. Chicago already proved this. Boeing, McDonald’s, Caterpillar, Citadel, nearly 70k jobs, all gone. Now they’re facing billion-dollar deficits, half empty schools and neighborhoods without grocery stores.

I saw someone who lived in a rent-controlled apartment in California put it perfectly, he said his landlord could no longer afford maintenance so the pool was filled with dirt, the floors had soft spots, and the foundation ended up cracking. That’s what overregulation does, it destroys quality.

People who voted for this will eventually feel the pain but they won’t blame the policies or the politicians, they’ll blame the rich for leaving.

This conversation is always difficult because most people simply don’t understand market dynamics or incentives. In a free society, people act in their own self-interest. If you remove profit and reward dependency, productivity dies and the city with it.

If you think things are expensive now, just wait until they’re “free.”

[Jason Ai. Williams @GoingParabolic]

Defintion of a Democrat Socialist
https://t.co/P2Roe5SjEW