I didn’t realize it until now, but guys… when Supernova? $EGLD desperately needs this upgrade.
Sub-300ms finality, 600ms blocks, consensus decoupled from execution.
This shakeout feels like the final filter before the real bull run kicks off. Who’s into it? #MultiversX
At these prices, I hope at least 90% of the paper hands and loud haters have already exited.
Curious if they’ll magically return once $EGLD starts heading back toward ATH!?
Many are looking at how much @MultiversX / Elrond / $EGLD has dropped in price, especially percentage-wise.
Few, if any, look at where it started, the levels it reached, and where it stands today compared to competitors.
So let me help.
Elrond delivered 839x returns for @binance ICO users at ATH, while private investors achieved 1091x. By this metric, among L1s launched in the same period or later, only Solana ranks ahead; we come next.
Today’s ROI for public and private ICO participants puts us above Polkadot, NEAR, Monad, and Aptos, close to SUI—roughly mid-table among the top 10.
I’m not sure where you’re looking, but from our starting point and everyone else’s, we’re still in the game with all of them, ahead of most.
People call @lucianmincu (the smart one) and @beniaminmincu (the old/wise one) scammers for “only” 839x and 1091x returns, with today’s market ROI at 6x (public) and 8x (private).
Why aren’t NEAR holders calling their team scammers for a 2x ICO ROI, or Polkadot holders, or even SUI with slightly higher ROI than EGLD?
Nobody does, because they’re blinded by the market or, to be brutally honest, most other projects barely have a community that cares about price or ecosystem.
Trust me: we have a huge community of everything—haters, fans, elite minds.
What we lack are VCs and market makers; most missed the gem in 2020, and those who didn’t exited during the 1000x run.
We have a clean cycle ahead: new players will enter for the long term when the market recovers, along with people migrating from failed chains that long ago stopped delivering upgrades or real products.
Answer this: How many projects from that table own a majority stake in a full stablecoin issuer (@xMoney_com) across Europe (soon expanding), with over 50k debit cards issued directly (no third party), many Web2 merchants accepting crypto payments (I use most of them regularly), plus a multichain wallet (@xPortalApp) that frankly beats the rest?
Answer: none.
Their foundations never focused on the phase after crypto dreamers leave and regulated institutions enter.
Most will be left behind or forced to catch up in the next 5 years.
Our handicaps:
- Europe-based
- Missing US players (if you’re one and reading this, get in at this price)
- No strong market makers or liquidity
- Romanians
- Not hardcore builders; we need fewer wannabes
#Perspective
@CraigOPodcast@beniaminmincu talked about restructuring the team and cut almost half of it. Does this mean #MultiversX is prepared if a bear market comes?? And if that are they willing to build another 4 Years in a bear market? :)
#MultiversX 2035 Thesis: If the crypto market hits 75 trillion dollars as @RaoulGMI predicts, a 1% share puts #multiversX at a 750 billion dollar valuation. A 2 percent share means 1.5 trillion dollars. This assumes $EGLD becomes the global backbone for tokenized financial assets
@alinsuciu_ Let's hope that will change in the future. We can also look at it differently, in the sense that some of the best blockchain technology originates from Europe.
@alinsuciu_ Because that’s exactly how markets work. Why would anyone buy gold at $5K? Because when people go absolutely crazy with euphoria, it shows up in the price and market conditions. The same applies to $ETH and many other assets during bull runs. Higher prices attract more investors
@EricLDaugh If you are 14-year-old retard stuck in 4th grade because you’re too dumb to pass. Being the biggest kid in class doesn’t give you the right to beat up every boy just because you’re bigger, does it? So with what f*right do you think Greenland belongs to America, you absolute moron