@houndybs@redeemed_zoomer You clearly have no idea what you’re making a mockery about. The traditional criteria the Church actually looks at for claimed incorruption specifically require no artificial preservation. Lifelike flexibility and freshness without intervention is the whole point.💀
@Ro_Bans@darlingstrawbie So consciousness defines life?
Are retarded people fully conscious or are they impaired in terms of cognitive ability?
Are people with Alzheimers fully conscious or just internally conscious?
Consciousness is a subjective matter whereas conception is not.
@islaypro@bigdongo97@JakeWol23093207@CryptoOnlyCoims Genuine https://t.co/9lXkjb0gP3 lean Orthodox.But their customs also carry out veneration of the bones of saints.I sense a level of hypocrisy unless you can burden your case.
@davidgustafson5@trad_west_ Plato’s Greek (ἀνασχινδυλευθήσεται) is often translated “impaled,” but many editions call it “crucified.” The parallel still stands: a perfectly just man is tortured and fixated on a wooden stake,i.e.,the nave of a cross,e.g..Jesus’ crucifixion, regardless of current English.
@MasterMaliq That said,I appreciate your honesty and concern over the apparent censorship of truth.
You are the first Muslim I have encountered who has put forth such a concern on X.
@MasterMaliq Perhaps it isn’t really The Truth.That is the issue with ☪️,there is a censure against other faiths because you wouldn’t be able to maintain your faith without it.The reason why there are far more apostates in non-Muslim majority countries is because you don’t have this safeguard
@molochfan@zombitast@orthodox_33ad I have also observed that this is your main contention against the burden of proof for Catholicism.We could rant on endlessly with our viewpoints on Trinitarian ontology but we won’t result in concurrence.Any other contentions specifically?It’s hilarious how this is an X reply.
@molochfan@zombitast@orthodox_33ad I apologise for @‘ing you several times because the pesky absence of the Blue Tick burdens me.
But your contention falls because there is distinction without division through logical deduction.
@molochfan@zombitast@orthodox_33ad Quoting Aquinas to the same objection,things identical to the same thing are identical to each other if the identity is both real and https://t.co/DVZVvvbuEZ they differ in their proper ratio so the middle term ESSENCE is not taken univocally in the syllogism.
@molochfan@zombitast@orthodox_33ad Transitivity does not force collapse because the identity with the essence is real but NOT PURELY lconceptual in the same formal sense across terms.
@molochfan@zombitast@orthodox_33ad Transitivity of identity does not obtain univocally here, for the predication is analogical: each Person is the undivided Essence subsisting relatively, precluding composition or modal collapse.
Your contention falters here
@molochfan@zombitast@orthodox_33ad In the Godhead, the subsistent relations of Paternity, Filiation, Spiration, and Procession are really identical with the one absolutely simple divine Essence, yet they are really distinguished by (mutual opposition of origin).
@molochfan@zombitast@orthodox_33ad The Divine Persons are really distinct from each other by these relations, yet each is wholly identical to the UNDIVIDED ESSENCE. This preserves(not violates) the absolute simplicity. The “addition” framing treats God like a carnal creature bound by time.
@molochfan@zombitast@orthodox_33ad Your critique misrepresents Aquinas. The divine relations aren’t extra “additions ” added to the essence (❌ E + R1 + R2 composition). Each relation IS that one simple divine essence, subsisting under (opposed relations of origin).
@molochfan@zombitast@orthodox_33ad Relations in God aren’t accidents to an essence.Due to divine simplicity, each relation is one divine essence subsisting in a distinct mode (paternity,filiation).Just distinctions by opposition of its origin.Analogy, not univocity.Carnal metaphysics do not apply to the infinite.