@michaelryan756@Ausbobsmit So cooked how many people lap up this nonsense. Thanks for going to the effort here, I hope this gets seen.
NDIS rorters are absolute scum but turning this into a racial issue on some bullshit hearsay for engagement is shameful
I sincerely appreciate the time and effort Aaluxx has dedicated to ideating and drafting up this proposal, but I do not support this proposal in its current form.
TLDR: Dual LPs are not "first class citizens" with this proposal.
This proposal will convert synth units in the liquidity pools to protocol-owned dual-LP positions in 30 days. This effectively "locks in" the impermanent loss caused by savers leverage for dual-LPs (many of whom are down 90-99%), right at the absolute bottom. This is because the opportunity to benefit from leveraged synth upside has been removed.
It's a very tough task but we need to balance the interests of all parties with this proposal, and to me this feels like a raw deal for dual LPs who have repeatedly been screwed over (albeit unintentionally) for years.
I'm not sure I have a good solution to this, I'm just highlighting the impacts of this proposal. Perhaps synths could only be converted to POL at certain price ratios for each pool, allowing DLPs to still potentially benefit from synth leverage to the upside.
$10,000 $RUNE #LuckyLottery - CHANCE TIME 🎁
We'll be drawing 5 winners on the lottery from this post.
To enter:
⚡ Like, repost & follow @XDEFI_Wallet
⚡ Tag 2 #THORChads
⚡ Comment your RUNE address
Only XDEFI Wallets opted-in to campaign mode will be eligible to win!
@PrincePajeon I recognise that's a small cohort though, and I see what you're saying.
It has been interesting to chat this through, thanks for your thoughts.
@PrincePajeon RTS' are hard. IMO you have to commit and put in some hours before playing them becomes worthwhile.
Maybe its just PTSD from trying to get friends into SC2, but I worry about that cohort of 'casuals' that will be discouraged from committing, because they are already behind
@PrincePajeon I personally will watch the showdown. I will keep up to date on changes. I will consume anything Stormgate chooses to give me - and they have given me plenty.
So day 1, I will have an advantage over those that did not. In my eyes that is 'anti-competitive'
@PrincePajeon I don't mean competitive in the sense of 'being able to compete at the highest level'.
I mean competitive in the sense that participants are playing the same game with the same mechanics and the same knowledge available to me.
@PrincePajeon @itspch_@PlayStormgate This way doesnt *also* advertise, it *only* advertises.
You can't tell me you honestly think the function of a showmatch is be a 'beta' or testing ground for bugs.
If anything, it marginalises the casuals that don't engage with the game until launch
@PrincePajeon @itspch_@PlayStormgate I have no issue with a closed beta for a limited audience of playtesters, behind closed doors.
That's not what I'm talking about - paid early access and broadcasted tournaments are a different kettle of fish entirely.
@PrincePajeon @itspch_@PlayStormgate It seems anticompetitive to me. Likewise with paid 'early access' situations, which are also common.
It's gross to log in day 1 and realise you're somehow already 6 months behind the curve. Particularly in a competitive RTS...
Not happy Jan