chezp ⚡️ ᚱune of Thor

Asgardian on Midgard @Maya_Protocol + @Thorchain 🍫⚡️ $CACAO + $RUNE x-chain beta tester + film/vid pro + 3d/2d motion gfx/anim + artwerk

[chezp ⚡️ ᚱune of Thor @RuneofThor]

We're just getting started.

@THORChain $RUNE

[Aaluxx⚡️🍫🛡️ @AaluxxMyth]

Alright Thorchads! Once again, here is my proposal on how to move forward after Friday’s TSS vault exploit. Looking forward to constructive feedback to make it better, and looking forward to read new and different proposals if you have one! It is important to participate actively during this time. Let’s go!! @THORChain

https://t.co/2gxyCV30aZ

[chezp ⚡️ ᚱune of Thor @RuneofThor]

🍫 ☀️ Rise and grind fam ☀️ 🚀

[Maya Protocol @Maya_Protocol]

Gm tribe! 🍫🍫🍫

[chezp ⚡️ ᚱune of Thor @RuneofThor]

@AaluxxMyth There is nothing but forward!

[LeoDex @leodexio]

New for @Maya_Protocol and @THORChain users: seamlessly add and manage liquidity pool (LP) positions

Go to https://t.co/wj7ga0NdX6 to view and manage all Maya & THORChain LPs

[THORChain Community @THORCommunity]

Station is BACK!!!

Fully agentic, MPC-secured across 37+ chains

@THORChain secures native assets, @RujiraNetwork builds Omnichain DeFi on top

→ Talk to your wallet
→ Swap, bridge, and stake in one conversation
→ No seed phrase

The future of agentic wallets has arrived ⚡️

[chezp ⚡️ ᚱune of Thor @RuneofThor]

@RujiraNetwork Absolute 🔥

[Rujira @RujiraNetwork]

https://t.co/UoRw1q2T8Q

[THORWallet - Onchain Finance @Thorwallet]

Dear community, we’ve shut down our Discord.

For support, please use the in-app support system❓
For chatting with fellow members, join our Telegram📱

Thanks for being part of THORWallet ⚡️

[chezp ⚡️ ᚱune of Thor @RuneofThor]

@Maya_Protocol Opti fo sho

[Cryptomaze 🇨🇭 @marcelharmann]

NEW @Thorwallet Public TestFlight - check it out.

@THORChain cross-chain limit orders
@1inch @OndoFinance on-chain stocks

and much more.

Another huge release.

On Monday it comes to the store.

https://t.co/P8H0Aqzc5M

[chezp ⚡️ ᚱune of Thor @RuneofThor]

@Maya_Protocol Maya is cooking! 🔥🔥🔥

[Maya Protocol @Maya_Protocol]

RT for CACAO powers🍫🪄

[chezp ⚡️ ᚱune of Thor @RuneofThor]

quantum knocking on our door…

@Vultisig solves the quantum attack vector through core design: seedless Multi-Party Computation (MPC) + Threshold Signature Scheme (TSS) that already incorporates quantum-resistant cryptography

[Justin Drake @drakefjustin]

Today is a monumentous day for quantum computing and cryptography. Two breakthrough papers just landed (links in next tweet). Both papers improve Shor's algorithm, infamous for cracking RSA and elliptic curve cryptography. The two results compound, optimising separate layers of the quantum stack. The results are shocking. I expect a narrative shift and a further R&D boost toward post-quantum cryptography.

The first paper is by Google Quantum AI. They tackle the (logical) Shor algorithm, tailoring it to crack Bitcoin and Ethereum signatures. The algorithm runs on ~1K logical qubits for the 256-bit elliptic curve secp256k1. Due to the low circuit depth, a fast superconducting computer would recover private keys in minutes. I'm grateful to have joined as a late paper co-author, in large part for the chance to interact with experts and the alpha gleaned from internal discussions.

The second paper is by a stealthy startup called Oratomic, with ex-Google and prominent Caltech faculty. Their starting point is Google's improvements to the logical quantum circuit. They then apply improvements at the physical layer, with tricks specific to neutral atom quantum computers. The result estimates that 26,000 atomic qubits are sufficient to break 256-bit elliptic curve signatures. This would be roughly a 40x improvement in physical qubit count over previous state-of-the-art. On the flip side, a single Shor run would take ~10 days due to the relatively slow speed of neutral atoms.

Below are my key takeaways. As a disclaimer, I am not a quantum expert. Time is needed for the results to be properly vetted. Based on my interactions with the team, I have faith the Google Quantum AI results are conservative. The Oratomic paper is much harder for me to assess, especially because of the use of more exotic qLDPC codes. I will take it with a grain of salt until the dust settles.

→ q-day: My confidence in q-day by 2032 has shot up significantly. IMO there's at least a 10% chance that by 2032 a quantum computer recovers a secp256k1 ECDSA private key from an exposed public key. While a cryptographically-relevant quantum computer (CRQC) before 2030 still feels unlikely, now is undoubtedly the time to start preparing.
→ censorship: The Google paper uses a zero-knowledge (ZK) proof to demonstrate the algorithm's existence without leaking actual optimisations. From now on, assume state-of-the-art algorithms will be censored. There may be self-censorship for moral or commercial reasons, or because of government pressure. A blackout in academic publications would be a tell-tale sign.
→ cracking time: A superconducting quantum computer, the type Google is building, could crack keys in minutes. This is because the optimised quantum circuit is just 100M Toffoli gates, which is surprisingly shallow. (Toffoli gates are hard because they require production of so-called "magic states".) Toffoli gates would consume ~10 microseconds on a superconducting platform, totalling ~1,000 sec of Shor runtime.
→ latency optimisations: Two latency optimisations bring key cracking time to single-digit minutes. The first parallelises computation across quantum devices. The second involves feeding the pubkey to the quantum computer mid-flight, after a generic setup phase.
→ fast- and slow-clock: At first approximation there are two families of quantum computers. The fast-clock flavour, which includes superconducting and photonic architectures, runs at roughly 100 kHz. The slow-clock flavour, which includes trapped ion and neutral atom architectures, runs roughly 1,000x slower (~100 Hz, or ~1 week to crack a single key).
→ qubit count: The size-optimised variant of the algorithm runs on 1,200 logical qubits. On a superconducting computer with surface code error correction that's roughly 500K physical qubits, a 400:1 physical-to-logical ratio. The surface code is conservative, assuming only four-way nearest-neighbour grid connectivity. It was demonstrated last year by Google on a real quantum computer.
→ future gains: Low-hanging fruit is still being picked, with at least one of the Google optimisations resulting from a surprisingly simple observation. Interestingly, AI was not (yet!) tasked to find optimisations. This was also the first time authors such as Craig Gidney attacked elliptic curves (as opposed to RSA). Shor logical qubit count could plausibly go under 1K soonish.
→ error correction: The physical-to-logical ratio for superconducting computers could go under 100:1. For superconducting computers that would be mean ~100K physical qubits for a CRQC, two orders of magnitude away from state of the art. Neutral atoms quantum computers are amenable to error correcting codes other than the surface code. While much slower to run, they can bring down the physical to logical qubit ratio closer to 10:1.
→ Bitcoin PoW: Commercially-viable Bitcoin PoW via Grover's algorithm is not happening any time soon. We're talking decades, possibly centuries away. This observation should help focus the discussion on ECDSA and Schnorr. (Side note: as unofficial Bitcoin security researcher, I still believe Bitcoin PoW is cooked due to the dwindling security budget.)
→ team quality: The folks at Google Quantum AI are the real deal. Craig Gidney (@CraigGidney) is arguably the world's top quantum circuit optimisooor. Just last year he squeezed 10x out of Shor for RSA, bringing the physical qubit count down from 10M to 1M. Special thanks to the Google team for patiently answering all my newb questions with detailed, fact-based answers. I was expecting some hype, but found none.

[Rujira @RujiraNetwork]

The Merge has ended!

It has been a full year since we opened the Merge, allowing users to migrate their $KUJI and some of the ecosystem tokens from Kujira to our new home on THORChain and merge them into $RUJI.

With the Merge now ended, here’s what this means for you 🧵👇

[THORWallet - Onchain Finance @Thorwallet]

Cross-chain limit swaps are coming to THORWallet ⚡️

Powered by @THORChain, you will be able to set limit prices across native assets directly inside the app.
For example, BTC → ETH.

No bridges
No wrapping
Just native cross-chain execution.

Shipping in the next app version 📱

[Cryptomaze 🇨🇭 @marcelharmann]

Just shipped a new @Thorwallet hero 🎥

Built with AI, refined by humans.

We’re already integrating AI across everything:
Claude for code reviews, product workflows, release summaries, analytics and now even frontend experiments. Speed is compounding.

I expect 2–3x output from our team this year.
Possibly more.

Exciting times ⚡️

[Baseline @BaselineMarkets]

https://t.co/e9T4WJDaBR

[chezp ⚡️ ᚱune of Thor @RuneofThor]

Sweet!

Will the original seed phrase still be a risk factor if it were compromised? Or are the funds somehow imported into new addresses that are multi-sig secure?

Please put out a post that clarifies the security of funds once imported to a new MPC wallet 🙏🏻

[Vultisig @vultisig]

Seed-phrase import is now live on Vultisig!

Import your old seedphrase wallets and convert them to multi-modal, multi-signature, and secure MPC wallets with just a few clicks!

It's time to throw away that old wallet.

[chezp ⚡️ ᚱune of Thor @RuneofThor]

@iceman00008 @vultisig