M.C. Visser

Software guy from the Netherlands. Broad spectrum human being.

[M.C. Visser @RuntimeTraveler]

Why downloading #consciousness will never happen https://t.co/jIDxiNdMGM

[M.C. Visser @RuntimeTraveler]

@One_Supernova @Uggg @zaelefty This is very specific. There are other types of OT-DSD.

It should be easier for you to disprove my A B C, as it is broader.

Also, I do not know who the authors are. Biologists or doctors?

The fact that evolution had to invent antagonistic regulation is a telltale sign IMHO.

[M.C. Visser @RuntimeTraveler]

@One_Supernova @Uggg @zaelefty A) There are cases the primary pathway is not clear cut.
B) The primary pathway can be incongruent with other sex charactistics.
C) The individual has a different self-perception.

This proves my point sex-is-binary is a useless definition. It's not a useful scientific model.

[M.C. Visser @RuntimeTraveler]

@One_Supernova @Uggg @zaelefty Either you are proving my point, or you are not talking about everyone having exactly one sex.

[M.C. Visser @RuntimeTraveler]

@Uggg @One_Supernova @zaelefty Finally, it settles the whole debate:

The spectrum will clearly show very few individuals score around 0. Also the impossibility of changing sex.

But it also shows that biological is a complex science rife with rule-breakers. 4/4

[M.C. Visser @RuntimeTraveler]

@Uggg @One_Supernova @zaelefty Next to that, the value better aligns with societal roles and expectations, compared to the sex-is-binary model. 3/

[M.C. Visser @RuntimeTraveler]

@Uggg @One_Supernova @zaelefty The sex-is-binary people should start admitting they made a definition/model, and not a scientific theory.

Their model breaks down when applying it to certain DSD's.

Our models do not. Both models are useful in different contexts.

[M.C. Visser @RuntimeTraveler]

@Uggg @One_Supernova @zaelefty To be clear: your model, my model, the sex-is-binary-model are definitions, and not scientific theories.

They only become more than just useless tautologies if they model something in the real world.

That gives is scientific credence. 1/

[M.C. Visser @RuntimeTraveler]

@One_Supernova @zaelefty All sex variables are highly correlated, and biologically coupled.

Using multiple variables, more than just ones involved in the pathway of gamete production, makes it a very robust and a realistic biological model.

[M.C. Visser @RuntimeTraveler]

@One_Supernova @zaelefty Using my own model (weighted multivariate summation), this person would be quite female, biologically speaking.

That is the limit of what biology can give you.

Medically, it would be quite impossible to tip it to the male side of the scale. Because: 1/

[M.C. Visser @RuntimeTraveler]

@TheLawfulEvil @zaelefty I don't think you are an idiot anymore. You are clearly emotionally invested in the topic.

[M.C. Visser @RuntimeTraveler]

@TheLawfulEvil @zaelefty Wow, very convincing argument 🤌

[M.C. Visser @RuntimeTraveler]

@NikHaflinger @ChrisJoDec1963 @HatzKatzn @zaelefty We are talking about DSD's.

[M.C. Visser @RuntimeTraveler]

@TheLawfulEvil @zaelefty Here is damning evidence against the braindead sex-is-binary camp:

[M.C. Visser @RuntimeTraveler]

@TheLawfulEvil @zaelefty Idiot. I am not activist and I didn't lie. Or where did I lie??? The only bias I have is a bias against woke.

https://t.co/8tGaoI46Qq

[M.C. Visser @RuntimeTraveler]

@CallsYouCochise @tyonhakuvelvote @zaelefty I would opt to average over multiple variables, including gestation, testostorone, milk production, etc.
You could give every relevant organ or tissue a grade, from being absent to fully functional. This would actually be more robust against silly claims of transgenders.

[M.C. Visser @RuntimeTraveler]

@ChrisJoDec1963 @HatzKatzn @zaelefty I got it from the video just posted.

How a person self-identifies is not something the doctors can predict.

This is what ChatGPT says.

[M.C. Visser @RuntimeTraveler]

@zaelefty Don't put me in the activist camp. I have no skin in the game.

The actual sex determination is not always the primary pathway.

Why aren't you clear about that?

[M.C. Visser @RuntimeTraveler]

@HatzKatzn @zaelefty The good news is that they look further than just the narrow binary definition of sex focussed purely om which pathway is dominant (if it is at all)

[M.C. Visser @RuntimeTraveler]

@CallsYouCochise @tyonhakuvelvote @zaelefty This would be much closer to what it is to be a woman: carrying a baby and taking care of it. Gametes are invisible irrelevant elements from a social perspective.

[M.C. Visser @RuntimeTraveler]

@CallsYouCochise @tyonhakuvelvote @zaelefty I would opt to average over multiple variables, including gestation, testostorone, milk production, etc.
You could give every relevant organ or tissue a grade, from being absent to fully functional. This would actually be more robust against silly claims of transgenders.