alt @MargaretPBrady. How long since a global shitstorm forced Pope Francis to waive the statute of limitations in the case of alleged rapist Fr. Marko Rupnik?
@FresneauJean Ironiquement, la plupart de ces prêtres et leurs familles sont très favorables au célibat. Le mariage et la prêtrise ministérielle sont presque impossibles à faire en même temps, surtout si vous ajoutez la parentalité au mélange.
@mfjlewis 2. Always just go round in circles (it’s to help abuse victims, ok let’s make that explicit, no we can’t bc actually it’s for other reasons). It’s bc deep down, all parties realize the pro arguments don’t work. Believe me, I have tried, & many people have tried. (cont)
@mfjlewis 3. If you’re familiar with psychology at all, these are classic thought-stopping techniques to avoid the anxiety caused by questioning cherished values and applying critical thinking to them. I’m just so allergic to this stuff.
@mfjlewis 2. with a lady who said, “if I start thinking about something too much I just sing a little song to myself, “the mystery of faith.” That’s what it sounds like just saying “submit, submit, submit.”
@mfjlewis 2. In this convo, Ripperger is a non sequitur. Bishops can either deal with priests like that or not (they’d always rather not because, ugh, conflict! And work!) Nothing to do with whether an objective state of adultery can be downgraded from a mortal sin.
@mfjlewis AL literally does not address abuse in the footnote. That’s why it needs to be updated/clarified. There are guidelines for people in non abusive situations to be obedient & receive communion. They can avoid sex, or keep having sex & rely on their conscience. No one will stop them
@mfjlewis Well, great for you. To most unbiased observers, a papacy hasn’t ended well since John Paul I (that’s a joke), or since St. John XXIII (not a joke). You think the Pope is an oracle, & I think they are usually incompetent men struggling w/ an institution grown too big to manage.
@mfjlewis Always going to be random nut job priests saying women can’t wear pants or polyamory is fine. If there is confusion re: abuse (giant flashing YES sign), the meeting should clarify that! It should be addressed in the context of AL! It’s not bc that’s not the point of the footnote.
@mfjlewis 5. And honestly it would take an act of God for this bishops’ meeting to do anything worthwhile. We (the two sides) stopped caring about each other a long time ago, and not facing up to conflict is basically the main Catholic art form at this point. Truly sick.
@mfjlewis 4. Again, one wonders, if the HS had left us, would the Church look any worse than it does now? Or would it look exactly like this? I don’t know.
@mfjlewis I don’t have talking points & I consider those people tiresome. Yes, have tried. But I can’t just erase what I know from when I digested the Church’s older discipline. People in the situation can have absolution (& communion) by confessing unchastity & intending to live chastity.
@mfjlewis 2. And wrt to people who “want to live the Catholic ideal but fall short” that’s everyone! That’s what confession’s for. AL’s upshot is some adulterous sex no longer needs to be absolved before communion, bc it’s unlike other sins, bc of “complexity.”
@mfjlewis It didn’t help, but the substance was there to have problems with. I think the Curia just doesn’t have a theory of mind for people who believe for reasons and not due to cultural/tribal aspects. Of course they would feel humiliation, grief etc