Bost addressed Illinois' procedure for counting mail-in ballots received after election day. A 7-2 court held that, as a candidate for office, Congressman Michael Bost has a legal right to sue to challenge the rules that govern the counting of votes in his election.
https://t.co/lJ2yYdcvjT
Driving along Mississippi’s Gulf Coast. Our fifth state of the trip.☀️
Unfortunately, we didn’t have time to stop, but the beaches looked incredible. Guess we’ll have to come back someday.
I'm told there's no evidence in fraud in California.
But if statistical anomalies, helicopters full of ballots, and on-camera confessions don't count as evidence, why are these reporters so reluctant to mention them on air? 🤔
@shipwreckedcrew Yes. Leadership of Obama’s DOJ bent numerous rules to prevent SCOTUS from considering it in 2013. This issue has been brewing for a while. https://t.co/MSNhyqXyd9
@varadmehta Compare these standing theories to the 4 years it took us at @JudicialWatch to get courts to recognize Congressman Bost’s standing as a federal candidate challenging rules for his own election. In retrospect, we should have just alleged aesthetic injury.
“Late votes are disproportionately for Democrats” struck me as believable.
“Late votes are disproportionately for whichever Democrat needs to come in 2nd to keep a Republican out of a two-man runoff” is not.
I can’t think of a better reminder for SCOTUS to agree with @JudicialWatch’s and @LPMississippi’s argument in pending Watson case than the current circus going on in CA. https://t.co/T8VCYzromt
Mail-in ballots favor Democrats.
OK, fine.
Spencer Pratt was never going to lead in mail-in ballots.
But what is the justification for mail-in ballots received BEFORE the election vastly favoring Karen Bass, and the ones received AFTER the election favoring Nithya Raman?
.@JudicialWatch case before the Supreme Court could end counting of Late Ballots as is going on in Cali right now. Supreme Court landmark decision could come in days.
@JudicialWatch lawsuit in federal court now to remove at least 875000 dirt names from the rolls in California. (6 million names already removed nationally thanks to us.)
We have now launched a seperate investigation into the current election crisis in California. DOJ should follow our lead and immediately launch a comprehensive and emergency civil rights and related criminal investigation into the voting debacle happening now in California.
A reminder that the only thing stopping the left from seizing your property is a Supreme Court they attack as illegitimate for not letting them just do stuff
NEW: @JudicialWatch out with a bombshell in their Thomas Crooks FOIA fight.
Records from July 17, 2024 FBI electronic communication indicate Butler Sheriff's Office exchanged 2 emails with Crooks prior to July 13 Trump assassination attempt.
Nature of the emails is redacted.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court is issuing opinions. One of the highest profile cases left is Watson v. RNC -- which asks whether states can count ballots that arrive *after* election day. Funniest time to issue it would be during the ~10 day post-Election counting.
No, SCOTUS did not just allow Alabama to use an unconstitutional map. The map Alabama will use was a 2023 remedy to the 2022 map. The 2022 map was struck down by the three-judge court in Alabama (later affirmed by SCOTUS) for evidentiary, not Constitutional, reasons.
1/...
I try not to contradict Nate very often but there’s a perfectly valid reason why it takes so long to count votes in California. Here is a typical timeline:
Election Day: everyone votes
Week 1: mail in ballots, absentee ballots, military ballots, overseas ballots, ballots accidentally issued to people’s pets, and ballots harvested from Skid Row start trickling in.
Week 2: As the ballots pile up, Officials consider appointing a Committee to Count Ballots.
Week 3: Committee to Count Ballots is appointed and commences discussion on electing a chairman.
Week 4: deadline for ballots from illegal immigrants.
Week 5: Committee decides that “chairman” is an outdated term and will be replaced by a term to be decided later once the Committee to Count Ballots Diversity Consultants finishes their report.
Week 6: fraudulent ballots from the Chinese Communist Party arrive.
Week 7: The Committee elects as Chairzerxon a nonbinary disabled child to count the ballots.
Week 8: it is discovered that the Chairzerxon does not actually know how to count.
Week 9: the ballots are thrown away and the Committee announces election results that are entirely made up.