Ruth ❯ ❯ ❯ ❯ ❯

for the hope of it all 🧚🏼‍♀️

[Ruth ❯ ❯ ❯ ❯ ❯ @Ruth1D_14]

My heart breaks for her. Losing someone I love is my worst fear.

[SELMA 🇩🇿🇵🇸 @sololiamstan93]

Liam Payne’s older sister Ruth on her Instagram Story

[Mak @mak_aura]

I love it, and I think it’s necessary. Some of y’all are actually disgusting.

[I Dissent @DissentFu]

This is the guy who ruled that the stolen images of YOUR children can legally be used to generate child sexual abuse material.

Share his face.

[salou❦ @hyunsthot]

Seeing an interesting tweet and the tl refreshes before you can finish reading it

[MeltedBarbie✨🫧🌙 @MeltedDollParts]

@DRodbone @Strummer2323 People saying “it’s AI” are missing the whole point.

Desensitizing people towards child pornography is such a harmful thing to do.

It DOESN’T “prevent” violence, it makes it worse.

We’ll have more men finding ways to sexualize EVERY little innocent thing children do.

[Strummer @Strummer2323]

@MeltedDollParts @DRodbone The fact that it shows children as sexual partners or in a sexual reference should be sickening to anyone who isn't a pedophile.

[Paranoid Humanoid @DRodbone]

I think the fact that the United States just legalized child pornography should be bigger news.

[LabellaYoncé💖🐝👑 @ariszabeymc]

@PopBase Pedophilia is literally getting normalized right in our faces and predators out their can use this to spread that shit online

[Ruth ❯ ❯ ❯ ❯ ❯ @Ruth1D_14]

Yo creo que esto de la p*dofilia es muy común y por eso no le ven lo malo a este tipo de cosas. Esos jueces han de ver ese contenido también.

[Pop Base @PopBase]

A federal appeals court ruled that the First Amendment protects an individual’s right to privately possess images or videos of child sexual abuse created using AI — if the material does not depict a real person and remains in the home.

The court relied on Supreme Court precedents Stanley v. Georgia (1969), which established protections for the private possession of obscene material in the home, and Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition (2002), which ruled that certain virtual depictions involving no real children are protected by the First Amendment.

The defendant in the case, Steven Anderegg, was charged with producing and distributing obscene AI-generated images and sending them to a minor over Instagram. The possession charge was dismissed under the Supreme Court precedents.

The judge panel in the case has asked the Supreme Court to “reconsider legal precedents that predate advances in AI.”

(https://t.co/dB9uM8NG4c)

[Rico @e_suavee]

me pressing no tip at the register

[barbarism critic @barbarismcrit]

I miss when people used to know how to do stuff

[aether @bluewdrift]

my life changed the moment I heard someone say that working out should be a celebration of what your body can do, not punishment for what you ate

[The Internet Remains Undefeated @WebUndefeated]

This is why it’s important to let kids be bored.🏴‍☠️😁

[Nicole Glennon @glennon_nicolee]

Qué clase de droga le puso Karol G a BbY WOW?

[Klara @klara_sjo]

Somewhere a therapist is trying to get people to "live in the moment" while this girl is already three levels deep into a made up game that only exists in her head and involves real trains.

The world needs more pointless whimsy.

[ً @cfwmx]

yall gotta learn sarcasm i cannot be saying i’m kidding all the time

[PABLO @kingAcuarioo]

Yo dándole like a todas las boludeces que suben con el gif de zendaya

[agustinG @_agusting]

Entonces, si entendí bien, farmear aura es esto básicamente

[Ruth ❯ ❯ ❯ ❯ ❯ @Ruth1D_14]

en un mundo justo y perfecto ella terminaría en la cárcel.

[kira 👾 @kirawontmiss]

A woman tried to falsely accuse a man of assaulting her but thankfully witnesses called her out for lying🙏

[Victor Okafor @TheVictorOkafor]

If you’re a man, do everything possible in this life to avoid getting into a physical fight.