We unreservedly condemn the brutal and vicious attack on Prof Lovemore Madhuku . The paranoid schizophrenic attack reflects the regime s fear of alternative voice and opinion. We have never been cowards . We have never yielded on matters of principle . We will DEFEND this constitution with the iortas of our last breadth . Autocrats are dispensable and have a miserable short and brutal shelf life .
Michael Carrick was a class act as a player and he can become a great coach as well. Nothing is impossible for this guy. Personally, I’m proud to have played with him by my side as well as with him as a manager on our bench. 🙌🏽👊🏽
They tried stealing your passport, they tried depriving you of time, they tried to sabotage you but no one, absolutely fuckn no one can keep you down. You are the lone spark from this whole tournament from just 1 game! Well done Maswanhise!!!!
🔸Good morning @ParliamentZim,
1. As the institution that’s meant to check and balance the executive, champion accountability and be a paragon of transparency, may you please publicize Senate President Mabel Chinomona’s conditions of service?
2. Are you aware that the Auditor-General revealed in her report that US$372,260 was used to renovate Chinomona’s home? Is such expenditure rational, let alone justified?
3. Why is public money being used to buy Chinomona pillows? Why can’t she buy her own pillows? What kind of pillow costs US$130?
4. What sort of curtains cost US$64,000?
5. How many vases and chandeliers did she purchase to rack up a bill of US$57,874?
6. Can you please give us the names of the suppliers that were used for this “renovation”?
7. When this money was disbursed, was there no concern that the invoices were inflated?
8. Why were procurement laws violated in these purchases? Is the Senate President above the laws that @ParliaZim enacts?
We need new leaders.🇿🇼
This damning revelation of wanton looting will never trend like the @ZiFMStereo poll, which made grown men sleep with their shoes on.
Personally, this disgusts me. $372k of public funds (your taxes, by the way) spent like it's a mere $10. If this doesn't infuriate you then you are a problem.
Public funds, private luxury?
Parliament splurged nearly US$400,000 upgrading Senate President Mabel Chinomona’s private home from US$64k curtains to luxury beds, appliances & vases while bypassing tender laws, a CITE investigation reveals.
Flagged by the Auditor-General.
Suppliers handpicked.
Oversight under scrutiny.
https://t.co/Ac9TlQRWRX
OR Tambo, The ANC President whose name is also given to Africa's largest Airport in Johannesburg, lived in this house for 22 years in Lusaka. The house is along Great East Road in Lusaka's Avondale and is painted in ANC colours, maintained yearly by the Zambian Government !!
This is what America’s current Director of National Intelligence said on 24 January 2019. It shows how they change their positions for political expediency as quickly as the British weather.
Six years ago, Tulsi Gabbard argued that the United States should not choose the leaders of other nations and should respect sovereignty. Today, she is serving a man who the world is openly mocking for wanting to do exactly that.
Politics has a short memory, and principles often bend when power calls. In between redacting Epstein documents and obscuring photographs linking Trump to the paedophile, they are exposing just how unprincipled they are, turning what was once a great country into a running late night comedy joke.
So why do you have a problem with South Africa for revoking the visas of your Kenyan runners who violated their tourist visas by working for you and breaking the law, Marco Rubio @SecRubio?
Do these rights only apply to the United States and not to other sovereign states? Or is the rule of law something you demand from others but refuse to respect when it does not suit you? That is a deeply duplicitous mindset.
I have never seen America at war with itself like this because of one man.
I remember Trevor Noah saying that Donald Trump is a typical African dictator who uses state institutions to break the law. That was during his first term. Asking the police to break the law is reckless and dangerous. Thankfully, the United States still has strong institutions led by people who are independent of his racist nonsense and personal impulses.
The Minneapolis police chief is a clear example of that institutional independence. He chose the Constitution and the rule of law over political pressure, and that is precisely what has prevented America from sliding into outright authoritarianism.
🔸Good day @PoliceZimbabwe,
Munobatira umbrella vanhu vakaitasei? What is the nature of the deployment?
We look forward to your clarification.
We need new leaders.🇿🇼
South Africa’s High Court issued a scathing ruling against the state for failing to stop xenophobic vigilante groups from blocking access to public healthcare facilities in Johannesburg. In a judgment handed down on 4 December 2025, the Gauteng Division ordered national, provincial and municipal authorities, as well as the police, to take immediate action to ensure unhindered access to clinics for all people, including undocumented migrants.
The case was brought by the Treatment Action Campaign, Médecins Sans Frontières and Kopanang Africa Against Xenophobia after vigilantes were found to be turning away anyone without a South African identity document at the Yeoville and Rosettenville clinics.
The court found that clinic staff and security guards had either stood by or effectively ceded control of access to the facilities to the vigilantes. Judge S D J Wilson said this conduct amounted to a breakdown of the rule of law and a serious violation of the constitutional right to healthcare.
In strongly worded remarks, the court described xenophobia as one of the greatest threats to democracy and human rights in South Africa, stating that it feeds on hatred and misdirects public anger away from the real causes of poverty and inequality. The judge rejected arguments by health authorities and the police that responsibility lay elsewhere, ruling that the Constitution and the National Health Act impose a positive duty on the state to remove barriers to healthcare access.
The court ordered the immediate removal of unauthorised individuals blocking clinics, the deployment of adequate security and proactive police intervention, as well as the posting of notices warning that obstruction of healthcare services is unlawful. The state has been instructed to report back to the court on steps taken to comply with the order. The judgment is being widely viewed as a landmark affirmation that xenophobia cannot be allowed to override constitutional rights in South Africa.
Part of the judgment read, “Xenophobia is one of the greatest threats to democracy and human rights we presently face.”
“It feeds on the hatred of the other, is animated by fantasy, and in its practised form is merely another kind of racism, for white foreigners seldom have much to fear.”
“If we can blame foreigners, we need not look to ourselves for the solutions to the poverty and inequality that scar our society.”
The case was heard on 25 November 2025 and the judgment was delivered on 4 December 2025.
Full judgement👇🏿
https://t.co/VRYlaMwBWN