This is a challenge for any Ashari who is willingly to debate after Ramadan, the topic will be about " The Aqeedah of the Salaf".
6 of your "scholars/students of knowledge" have already declined. Let us know.
This is what Imam Rawwas says in regards to the Rifa’iyyahs opinion of the sahaba in his Marāhil:
What do those who claim to be rifa’i have to say about this?
From the poetry of al-Imām al-Nawawī:
I shall die, and all that I have written shall remain... so how I wish, that one who reads my book, shall pray for me
Perhaps my Lord, by His grace, shall bestow... and forgive my shortcomings and the evil of my deeds
These couplets were written by al-Imām al-Nawawī رحمه الله before he passed away, later found by his student Ibn al-ʿAṭṭār رحمه الله.
May Allah have mercy upon the Imam and forgive him for any shortcomings. بجاه سيدنا محمد ﷺ
There is no historical or academic precedent for a Hanafi to call themselves an “Athari”
The Hanafis have always been either been Maturidis (essentially just Hanafis from a creedal perpsective) or ‘Ashari
📜 | When Qāḍī al-quḍāh Abū Yūsuf رحمه الله discussed Fiqh on his deathbed, related by al-Qāḍī Ibrāhīm ibn al-Jarrāḥ al-Kūfī:
"Abu Yusuf became ill, so I went to visit him, and found him unconscious."
Shaykh Adham al-‘Asimī's new channel where they will reupload his old videos after his channel getting hacked and stolen
Subscribe and interact with the videos so that they can complete uploading the lessons archive as per YouTube regulations
https://t.co/b1G31Zu1pT
The Sunnah way of wearing the Shawl.
The Prophet ﷺ said: “Whoever revives my Sunnah then he has loved me. And whoever loved me, he shall be with me in Paradise.” [Jāmiʾ at-Tirmidhī]
🎥 @aswjgatherings
There is a misconception with regards to the chains of transmission for Sūfī Turuq and what they entail
These chains are not transmitting a secret knowledge, nor anything additional to Islam
They are simply chains that demonstrate their history of Tarbiyah up to the Prophet ﷺ
Wahhābīs trying to portray us as the “neo-Ḥanābilah” when they are in fact the neo-Ḥanābilah of this day and age. Their leader Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhāb claims that most of what is in al-ʾIqnāʿ and al-Muntahā is in opposition to the maḏhab of ʾImām ʾAḥmad and his naṣṣ.
@KhalilAndani@saladin0070@Haqiqatjou To answer @Haqiqatjou's question:
1. Affirming a Physical hand would necessitate contingency which would necessitate,
2. it is created,
3. And requires A Creator in order to exist. THUS
4. Believing God is physical would logically necessitate another God who created him.
“The intellectual sciences are like foods, and the sciences of religious law are as medicines. The sick person is harmed by food whenever he neglects the medicine.”
- Imam Al Ghazali, Ihya Ulum al-Din
@JuttSalafi You still believe in that propaganda that Muslims were literally polytheists worshipping trees and stones at this point you might be hopeless
Read this wisdom | short thread 🧵
Al-Jahiz said:
"Tell me about God, the Almighty. Could He not have punished the Canaanites, the tyrants, the Pharaohs, the descendants of the giants from the lineage of 'Ad and Thamud, and the people of arrogance and obstinance, with demons,
@AleMartnezR1 It’s a metaphor for the stamens prostrate to Adam which I created with my hands mean a figurative expression which means I created directly
@AleMartnezR1 The standard orthodox position is metaphorical, what you seem to be referring to is a fringe sect of modern day anthorpmorphists who are commonly found in online polemical circles. However they do not represent the standard view