The government intentionally imported hate to Canada, so they could pass laws to spy on all of us and punish us, for hate.
Yet magically the Mohammeds of the world will be exempt from such hatred laws, as it would be considered Islamophobic not to recognize their religion deems women to be lesser beings, akin to livestock.
Welsh Politician wants young White Welsh Girls everywhere to start wearing a Hijab so “they know how it feels from an early age”
These people are legit clinically insane.
There Are No Words
Minnesota Governor Tim Walz declares that deporting an illegal alien convicted of r*ping a 10-year-old girl after Walz PARDONED him will not make his state any safer.
Yes, this really happened... This guy could've been in The White House.
Carney wants sweeping powers over your phone while using a foreign one himself 🇨🇦 @SheilaGunnReid
According to the Wall Street Journal, Carney has continued using a British cellphone while speaking with foreign leaders.
Prime Minister Mark Carney wants sweeping new powers over Canada's telecommunications system. But according to a recent Wall Street Journal report, when it comes to his own communications, he's reportedly relying on a U.K.-based cellphone to communicate with foreign leaders.
If true, the irony is impossible to ignore.
The Carney government is pushing Bill C-22, legislation that would significantly expand Ottawa's authority over Canada's telecommunications sector in the name of national security. The bill would give the federal government broad powers to issue security orders to telecommunications companies, require providers to comply with government directives, and increase federal oversight of Canada's communications infrastructure.
Canadians are being told these extraordinary powers are necessary because secure communications matter.
Apparently, that principle may not apply to the Prime Minister himself.
According to the Wall Street Journal, Carney has continued using a British cellphone while speaking with foreign leaders. If that reporting is accurate, Canadians deserve answers.
The issue isn't simply where the phone was purchased; it's about whether the Prime Minister is following the same security, transparency, and record-keeping standards imposed on everyone else in government, and now on the public.
Among the questions that should be answered:
➢ Communications security: Was the device approved for sensitive government communications under standards established by the Communications Security Establishment (CSE) and Treasury Board?
➢ Government records: Were official calls, text messages and other communications retained in accordance with the Library and Archives of Canada Act and federal information management policies?
➢ Access to Information: If government business was conducted using a foreign device or foreign telecommunications provider, are those records preserved in a manner that complies with the Access to Information Act, or could they be more difficult for Canadians to obtain?
➢ Government device policies: Was the phone issued, managed and secured by the Government of Canada, or was it a personal device used for official business?
Foreign jurisdiction: Were official communications routed or stored through infrastructure subject to U.K. law, and what security assessment was conducted before using that device to communicate with foreign leaders?
➢ Bill C-22: Why is the government demanding unprecedented oversight of Canadian telecommunications providers on national security grounds while the Prime Minister reportedly relies on a foreign telecommunications provider for his own communications?
Ottawa insists foreign technology, foreign influence and foreign infrastructure pose national security concerns. Yet the Prime Minister himself reportedly chose a foreign cellphone and foreign carrier while conducting international diplomacy.
Rules for thee, but not for me.
The contradiction remains glaring: a Prime Minister seeking sweeping new powers over Canadians' communications while reportedly placing his own trust in a foreign telecommunications provider.
🚨 THE NUMBER THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO NOTICE:
89% of Canadian exports to the U.S. entered tariff-free.
Canada’s effective U.S. tariff rate?
Just 3.1%…the lowest among major trading partners.
Yet we’re told Trump caused Canada’s housing crisis, productivity collapse, deficits, inflation and falling living standards.
Tariffs hurt steel, autos, aluminum and lumber.
But Canada’s wider economic failure was made in Canada. 🇨🇦
#Canada #Trump
@ConceptualJames The Globe and Mail is largely state subsidized… so… take it with a grain of salt. Their job is less to inform and more to propagandize.
Carney's condo bailout just got a whole lot shadier 🏙️
MP @AaronGunn joins Rebel News' @DreaHumphrey to explain why Conservatives tried to launch an emergency ethics investigation into Carney’s “Billionaire Condo Buyout,” and the troubling Brookfield connection they say Canadians deserve answers about.
Suspicions surrounding Prime Minister Mark Carney's $1.45 billion condo bailout plan deepened Tuesday after the Liberal majority shut down the federal Conservatives effort to investigate who the controversial plan truly benefits.
The plan, first announced by Carney and B.C. Premier David Eby, would see governments use taxpayer funds to acquire up to 2,200 unsold condominium units in Greater Vancouver after Carney argued developers were "stuck" and "don't want to sell at a loss."
Despite Parliament being recessed for the summer, newly appointed Conservative Shadow Minister for Ethics and Accountable Government Aaron Gunn and his Conservative colleagues called an emergency meeting of the House of Commons Ethics Committee to demand answers.
In an interview with Rebel News, Gunn explained how Carney’s plan to intervene when developers face pressure to lower the cost of their units to match market demand and affordability amounts to a massive transfer of wealth away from young Canadians trying to enter the housing market.
"You're literally taking tax dollars in some cases from individuals who have been struggling to enter the housing market for the very first time... and you're giving it to wealthy developers who have literally made more money than practically anybody over the past 20 years on the Vancouver real estate market," Gunn said.
As Conservative MPs dug deeper into the little-known details surrounding the controversial proposal, they say they uncovered connections they believe Canadians deserve to see fully examined to avoid any perception of a conflict of interest.
One of the most significant potential conflicts was Brookfield's June 3 announcement that it had entered into a joint industrial venture with Concert Properties, just 15 days before Carney and Eby unveiled their plan to use taxpayer-backed financing to acquire up to 2,200 unsold Metro Vancouver condominium units.
According to Conservative MP Gabriel Hardy, Concert Properties is among the major Metro Vancouver developers positioned to likely benefit from the proposed buyout due to its many empty condos in Greater Vancouver’s Burnaby city.
The timing of Brookfield's partnership is one of several issues Conservatives wanted independently scrutinized.
With those concerns in mind, Gunn introduced a motion calling for up to six ethics hearings into the condo-buying plan. Had it passed, key political figures and industry representatives—including federal Housing Minister Gregor Robertson, B.C. Housing Minister Christine Boyle, Concert Properties, Vancouver “Condo-King” developer Bob Rennie and even Brookfield Asset Management would have been called to testify.
Instead, the Liberal majority blocked Gunn's motion before the proposed investigation could proceed.
Gunn says Canadians still deserve answers. "Where did this idea come from? Who lobbied for it? And who, maybe most importantly, stands to benefit the most when it comes to developers, big banks, and foreign investors?" he said.