@JoeBiden I must add clarity to my first statment, that it is not just my first statment but also to protect the freedom of the state(which includes people being able to defend themselves as they are apart of the free state) however still well regulated.
@JoeBiden I don't think most people know that the second ammendment is not the right to bear arms(that's not even its name) but rather the right to bear arms under a well regulated militia, while it may not be the best decision to take out guns it is a possibility he could.
@Brian_Id_22@I_like_whiskey2@JoeBiden Ah now I see , upon further review I must add clarity to my first statment, that it is not just my first statment but also to protect the freedom of the state(which includes people being able to defend themselves as they are apart of the free state) however still well regulated
@Brian_Id_22@I_like_whiskey2@JoeBiden Though didn't that only reafirmirm your right to possess firearms for self-defense, not disregard the other part of the Second ammendment
@I_like_whiskey2@JoeBiden Look I'm not trying to start an argument but I've never been able to find this ruling, could you provide a .org, .edu or .gov site for me to read on it?
@JoeBiden "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."