None have been proven true.
Tyler Robinson is charged with aggravated murder for the Sept 10, 2025 sniper assassination of Charlie Kirk at UVU. Evidence includes rooftop sniper position, video, forensics, texts admitting the act, and meme-inscribed casings. Preliminary hearings are ongoing; prosecutors seek the death penalty.
Owens has claimed Robinson was a “patsy” not on campus, suggested betrayal by Kirk’s widow Erika or TPUSA staff, floated Israeli involvement, and pushed a “rigged mic”/anomalous shot theory. These remain unproven speculation. She faces a defamation lawsuit from Kirk’s former security head over related accusations.
Official investigation and court record point to Robinson acting alone for stated political reasons. No claims by Owens have been substantiated.
Ok so have been busy and haven't had a lot of time to post but I got a fuck ton of notes I'll be posting later about day 3 and today. And holy shit all the retards are cooked🤣🤣🤣
Dear lord there are a lot of notes I took. I'm doing this while working and listening and hitting down stuff on a paper. But here we go. Day 2 after lunch notes.
-More evidence from tpusa interesting
-they really don't want this entered
-oh they are terrified of this evidence
-fucking what? You don't want it because it's to biased?
-i wonder if it talks about how Charlie would want the death penalty for Tyler via quoting scriptures lol
-OF COURSE HE FUCKING TARGETED CHARLIE! CHARLIE IS FUCKING DEAD!!!
- so if he didn't target charlie for his beliefs what did he shoot him for?
- IN HIS NOTE HE SAID YOU CANT REASON WITH HATE LIKE THAT!!! OF COURSE HE TARGETED HIM!!
-The book of Matthew is interesting
-this is a slimeball argument. His confession letter states why he killed him.
-LOL he really doesn't want anything entered
-oh yeah they are arguing stupid shit they have zero case lol
- this is ridiculous
- damn the media is actually coming in clutch here
- this is boring now
- evidence is harmful to the jury?
Meaning it's terrible for their case. Many such cases lol
- hell yeah let's go judge!
Yes motive! Like the killers TRANS FUCKING LOVER HE WROTE A NOTE TO!
Still listening more to come. I'll update the next chance I get.
Alright next batch of notes.
- oh now we got cross
- now we're asking about the bullet again
- so the holster now has a gun in it?
- she's not getting the answer she wants it seems
- she's REALLY not getting the answer she wants
- so they keep saying he didn't SEE the gun. Dear lord
- so he shot him too fast?
- video behind the tent? Why?
- WTF the tent is not even that big why are you arguing this?
- this is horrible for cross
- bullshit he went on his own The family narked on him. they made him turn himself in.
- no I can't see the gun under the covering lol
- so if it's already confirmed by all parties he can best why is it still in question that he did it?
Alright day 2 of the Charlie Kirk Trial here are my thoughts while listening at work.
- Your honor this evidence is detrimental to my case lol
- media is fighting for all the footage to be shown
- stupid arguments about the jury, if the cop in the Gorge Floyd case couldn't get a fair Trial because of media how does Tylers team expect to get better treatment?
- so this video shows him going up to his perch and taking the shot. That would be powerful.
- so we have footage of him the moment he even enters the area? God he's fucked. He never would have gotten away. Regardless of if he confessed. Damn
- this fucker ate at Chick-fil-A before he shot Charlie?!
-so he changed clothes and now has a rifle in his pants in the video
- damn they tracked him the whole time.
-LOL this is not looking good for the retards online🤣🤣
-He stopped and talked to a cop the same night?!?
- so now there is to much footage?
- awesome the video is being entered and will be played.
-Oh cross this should be good.
-What is this line of questioning? Is he trying to blame the cops for nit securing the college better?
-Oh does she think she has dirt on the cops?!
-oh wrong page lol
-Why so many objections when all the others have failed?
-This hearsay rule seems like a way to play fast with evidence.
-Defense seems like they want to fight on appeal rather then in trial.
So far this is more boring then other trials I've listened to. But oh well.
Alright I never post and lurk but I'm going to be listening to the charlie kirk trail while at work and live tweet my thoughts. Sounds like fun what could go wrong?🤷🤣