SouravFX

Trader💰||

Forex || Prop Firm (50K+ Funded)
Reward- 8K+
Join-

[SouravFX @S0uravfx]

@ISKTRADER @fundedsquad @ajwadthefalcon Check my old post fake ip rule

[SouravFX @S0uravfx]

Still no update, no explanation, No Payout from @fundedsquad @ajwadthefalcon

[SouravFX @S0uravfx]

@GoldInsiderX @fundedsquad @ajwadthefalcon That's true

[SouravFX @S0uravfx]

@GamblerTraderr @fundedsquad @ajwadthefalcon Fake IP reason check my old post

[SouravFX @S0uravfx]

@sp_markets @fundedsquad @ajwadthefalcon Fake ip reason

[SouravFX @S0uravfx]

@theproptimes @fundedsquad @fundedsupport1 @ajwadthefalcon @SKYFundedSquad Yes

[SouravFX @S0uravfx]

@shivamisop @theproptimes @fundedsquad @fundedsupport1 @ajwadthefalcon @SKYFundedSquad Yes

[The Prop Times @theproptimes]

🚨 How many payout denials does it take before traders start asking serious questions?

Another trader. Another rejected payout.

This time it’s @S0uravfx, someone with a proven payout history across multiple prop firms and no previous IP-related issues.

According to the trader, @fundedsquad denied a $929.78 payout over an alleged IP policy violation.

If a payout is rejected for a technical reason, traders deserve more than a generic explanation. Transparency matters. Clear evidence builds trust. Vague responses only create more doubt.

Risk policies should protect firms from abuse, not leave genuine traders questioning whether they’ll ever get paid.

@fundedsquad, the community is paying attention. A clear public response would go a long way.

@ajwadthefalcon @Billfundedsquad @researcher139 @SKYFundedSquad @tricolof1 @cryptoparida Kindly resolve this issue

[SouravFX @S0uravfx]

@cryptoparida @propwatchmedia Okay sir thank you for your clarification

[SouravFX @S0uravfx]

@cryptoparida @propwatchmedia No worries. You can continue promoting Funded Squad and let your followers' payouts get blocked. Asking you for help was my mistake. @cryptoparida

[SouravFX @S0uravfx]

@propwatchmedia @fundedsquad open your eyes

[PropWatch @propwatchmedia]

🚨 Is FundedSquad under fire, or are payout denials becoming the new normal?

Another trader. Another payout denied.

This time it’s @S0uravfx , a trader who has withdrawn $5,000+ from multiple prop firms without any IP-related issues. He even promoted @fundedsquad in the past.

Yet when it came time to pay his $929.78, the payout was rejected over an alleged IP policy violation that he strongly disputes.

At what point does the community stop calling these “isolated cases” and start asking difficult questions?

If your Risk Team is confident in every decision, why not provide enough evidence for traders to independently understand exactly why they’re being denied?

Rules should protect firms from fraud, not become a reason for genuine traders to lose both their payout and funded account without meaningful transparency.

@fundedsquad , do better. The trading community is watching.

@ajwadthefalcon @Billfundedsquad @researcher139 @SKYFundedSquad @tricolof1
@cryptoparida look into this Bro!

[SouravFX @S0uravfx]

@PropFirmsGuru @PropFirmMedia @cryptoparida @MSTARROHIT Scam firm 😔

[SouravFX @S0uravfx]

🚨Scam With Me @fundedsquad @PropFirmMedia @cryptoparida @MSTARROHIT
I never thought I would have to write a post like this, but the trading community deserves to know what happened.

I passed my FundedSquad challenge, followed all of their rules, and traded my funded account myself. When I became eligible for my payout of $929.78, I submitted my withdrawal request expecting a smooth process.

Instead, my payout was rejected.

The reason they gave was that my account had allegedly been accessed from two different locations: Kolkata and Patna, which they claimed violated their IP Usage Policy.
This allegation is completely false from my perspective.

I have never shared my account with anyone. I am a trading content creator who documents my funded trading journey publicly, and I personally operate my own accounts. The claim that someone else accessed my account from Patna simply does not reflect my actual usage.
I immediately contacted their Risk Team and requested a proper manual review. I explained everything in detail and asked them to investigate further.

Their response was simply that they had already reviewed the case, examined their internal logs, and that their decision was final. No meaningful opportunity was provided to challenge or verify the evidence they relied on.
As a result: • My $929.78 payout was denied. • My funded account was permanently breached. • My case was closed without any further review.

I'm not asking for special treatment. I'm asking for transparency, fairness, and clear evidence before a trader loses both their funded account and earned payout.

If a trader can pass the evaluation, trade successfully, earn a payout, and then lose everything over an IP allegation they genuinely dispute, every trader deserves to know.
I'm sharing my experience so others can make informed decisions.

Has anyone else faced something similar with @FundedSquad?

[SouravFX @S0uravfx]

@pav53604 @fundedsquad @HirenFX Same issue with me check my post

[SouravFX @S0uravfx]

@akkisharma539 @propwatchmedia @ArCoin2 Scam hai ye

[SouravFX @S0uravfx]

@psraushan0 @propwatchmedia Scammer hai ye firm

[SouravFX @S0uravfx]

@PropFirmMedia @cryptoparida @MSTARROHIT @fundedsquad

[SouravFX @S0uravfx]

@Watchpropfirms @PropFirmMedia @cryptoparida @MSTARROHIT Very frustrating