SEES Initiative

The SEES Initiative - Strenghtening the Evidence in Exercise Sciences
Learn more:

[SEES Initiative @SEES_Initiative]

Do you have any advice for a great trial?

We would like to say a big thank you to the authors (@Anitabamorim, @zadro_josh) for this analysis.

DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102088

[SEES Initiative @SEES_Initiative]

“What is the difference between a great trial and a mediocre trial?” 🤔

The editorial “What makes a great clinical trial? Exploring the features of five important physiotherapy trials” discusses significant trials and seeks to answer this question.

Follow this thread to know 👇

[SEES Initiative @SEES_Initiative]

- recruiting multicenter (2–56 sites)
- significant questions that take up the literature gap
- relevant results for clinic and publicity health

[Daniel Umpierre @danielumpierre]

Join the @STORKinesiology Seminar and let's talk about the @SEES_Initiative - May 5th!

[SEES Initiative @SEES_Initiative]

Do you have more ideas? How could we improve this issue?

We would like to thank the COTES team and the article authors (@avigotsky) for this discussion!🤗

DOI: 10.1007/s40279-019-01227-1

#AcademicChatter #AcademicTwitter

[SEES Initiative @SEES_Initiative]

"Not all studies, especially those with null findings, make it to formal publication."
This quote is from the paper "Moving Sport and Exercise Science Forward: A Call for the Adoption of More Transparent Research Practices", which explores questionable research practices (QRP)🧶

[SEES Initiative @SEES_Initiative]

This is a way to minimize issues in problematic scientific practices.
The paper recommends reading more at the Center for Open Science (https://t.co/XjNZhAbLR4) and utilizing the existing resources for preregistration, such as https://t.co/keeI21AbO4 or https://t.co/NZt4ZO3p32.