The Women's Inclusion and Leadership in Law (WILL) Initiative at the NLS is surveying a nationwide survey. Details here. If you are a woman litigator in Indian courts, do take ten mins to fill this. Please share widely. https://t.co/r36OzjyFTA
their constitutional rights.
๐ก Legal Impact: This judgment upholds the principle that adultery is a matter of personal choice, not criminal behavior, and that criminal laws should not invade personal relationships.
However, the woman herself would not face any punishment, making it discriminatory.
๐ Outcome: The Supreme Court struck down Section 497, ruling that it was unconstitutional and discriminatory towards women, as it treated women like the โPropertyโ of their husband and violated
The judgment is particularly notable for acknowledging that prisons, as state-run institutions, must uphold human dignity and equality, free from caste biases.
๐ Read More: https://t.co/Ww6WCoXZM9
๐ Why It Matters:
This ruling not only reaffirms the constitutional principle of equality but also sets a precedent for addressing caste-based discrimination in institutions across India.
This represents the judiciaryโs commitment to ensuring equal access to education for marginalized communities.
๐ Read More:
https://t.co/aMK0LCNk1w
The Supreme Court directed IIT Dhanbad to admit the student.
๐ Why It Matters:
The Courtโs stance echoes its earlier decision in Prince Jaibir Singh v. Union of India (2021), where a Dalit student was allowed admission to IIT Bombay despite a delay in fee submission.
๐Why It Matters: This decision highlights the tensions between medical regulations and Rights of Person with Disabilities Act,2016 and addresses the inclusion of students with disabilities in medical colleges.
๐Read More: [https://t.co/LjmIxdRRZP]
โMBBS : SC Asks Medical Board To Examine If Candidate With Speech Disability Can Complete Medical Education Courseโ
๐Date: [September 6, 2024]
๐ Location:[New Delhi, India]
๐ Summary: [The Supreme Court has directed a medical board to examine whether a student suffering from speech and language disability beyond 40% would be eligible for admission to MBBS Course, after Bombay HC upheld his admission cancellation citing medical regulations.]
๐ Why It Matters:
The Court's stance underlines the potential consequences for non-compliance of Court orders for internet intermediaries,
who disseminate information online. It also reflects the Judiciary's approach and concerns towards tackling misinformation in recent time.