Simon Gallo 🌻

Salesman • Promoter • Merchandiser

[GB News @GBNEWS]

‘The most authoritarian government in living memory.’

‘This is Soviet-esque stuff going on here’

Connie Shaw warns about ‘authoritarian’ Labour, as the Deputy Leader Lucy Powell plans to censor social media ahead of the general election.

[J.K. Rowling @jk_rowling]

You mean men, men who claim to be women. You are a national broadcaster that consistently obfuscates facts around sex because you’ve taken an ideological position the public overwhelmingly rejects. This isn’t news, it’s propaganda.

[Susan Hall AM @Councillorsuzie]

Despicable, what are they hiding?

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Printed, to be sent to every MP.

[Right over Left Everytime @RightSide_Uk]

This is how democracy dies in small-town Britain. In Thetford, a community of just 650 souls is being steamrollered with plans to dump 1,200 illegal migrants into RAF Barnham – and when locals turn up to the “public” meeting to demand answers, the council caps attendance at 120 despite room for 300. Inside, nobody has answers. Outside, frustration boils over as British people are locked out of decisions that will destroy their way of life.
Labour’s globalist betrayal and compliant councils treat our towns like dumping grounds for failed asylum claims and economic migrants who contribute nothing but strain on housing, schools, GPs and crime rates. Two-tier Britain again: the state rigs the system to silence dissent while accelerating the invasion. Cultural incompatibility isn’t abstract – it’s these overwhelmed communities watching their resources vanish and their safety erode.
We’ve had enough of this replacement racket. Stop the boats, end the hotel and dispersal scams, deport the criminals and those who don’t belong, and put British people first. These small towns didn’t vote for this transformation – they were never asked. Remigrate, reclaim our communities, and make Britain for the British again. The anger is justified. The fight is just beginning. 🇬🇧

[Alastair Hilton @London_W4]

I am having a drink this evening with a friend in a Chiswick pub. Two policemen have just come into the pub and asked me to step outside. I have stepped outside and they have threatened me because I tweeted about a councillor banning seating outside pubs in Chiswick. They admit on video (watch it!) that I did not break the law at all. They came to threaten me. To warn me off tweeting about councillors and the council. This is modern Britain. This is the police state. Please, please, please watch this video. It does involve me using very bad language, but this has got to be seen. Police coming out to threaten someone who hasn’t committed a crime. I’m fuming.

[Sharron Davies HoL MBE @sharrond62]

Yeap… we live in the most hypocritical times ever.

[Allison Pearson @AllisonPearson]

Zia Yusuf is rightly enraged that a monstrous rape gang ringleader is being released early.
Amber, one of his traumatised victims, learned he was out via the MEDIA.
And the useless Government claims this Pakistani national can’t be deported.

[Sarah Pochin MP @SarahForRuncorn]

Shabir Ahmed, the ringleader of a notorious Pakistani grooming gang in Rochdale, is being released from prison today after serving just 14 years.

Greater Manchester Police believe his gang raped as many as 50 young white girls.

If the British establishment refuses to confront this scandal head-on, there will soon be no British establishment left.

This cannot continue.

[Laila Cunningham @policylaila]

The Vagrancy Act is gone. So I went to the Euston Road encampment to see what that means for London’s streets.

What I saw should worry every Londoner.

[BBC Radio 4 Today @BBCr4today]

"The only way to fix this is to stop small boat crossings completely."

Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp responds to a BBC investigation that found a convicted people smuggler is living in Leicestershire.

https://t.co/OuXyfcSHq0

[The Free Speech Union @SpeechUnion]

In one of its last-ditch acts, this Labour Government has become even more unhinged.

A newly published Government green paper, Watch This Space, suggests forcing social media platforms to make content produced by public service broadcasters such as the BBC, ITV and Channel 4 “prominent and easily discoverable”.

It is truly shocking that a Western liberal democracy like the UK now thinks it is the Government’s job to decide what news its citizens should read and what is and isn’t deemed “trustworthy”.

In his latest article for The Spectator, the General Secretary of the Free Speech Union, Lord Young of Acton, says that the Government’s solution to the declining popularity of our legacy media appears to be protectionism.

He raises the possibility of President Trump — the leader of our closest ally — retaliating by forcing social media companies in the US to give greater prominence to domestically produced content. That would harm UK freelance content producers and could also damage the very broadcasters the Government is trying to protect.

Lord Young also makes a serious point about the shift away from traditional news sources, noting that: “The reason the BBC now attracts fewer viewers than YouTube is because people don’t trust it – and with good reason”.

But Lord Young has also exposed what may be Labour’s real objective: bringing Britain’s free press under state control.

Chapter 2 of the green paper suggests Labour may legislate to require social media providers to boost “local and national news publishers” as well as public service broadcasters. This could be a backdoor way of persuading newspapers and magazines to accept state regulation of the press.

That has long been a goal of figures such as Ed Miliband, Harriet Harman and Andy Burnham, following the failure to implement this recommendation from the Leveson Inquiry. Now they may have another opportunity to hobble the free press.

Lord Young has said: “This could be just the ticket, since news publishers would have a powerful incentive to ‘voluntarily’ sign up to a state-controlled regulator, knowing they’d face a huge competitive disadvantage if they didn’t. It could also be a way of doing it without incurring the wrath of the press, since editors are constantly bellyaching about losing eyeballs to algorithmically promoted digital news content. There would be a benefit to submitting to state regulation, as well as a cost.”

Read more from @toadmeister in @spectator 👇

[Rafe Heydel-Mankoo @RafHM]

Without @X & @ElonMusk the government would never have been shamed into having a rape gang inquiry

And we would never have seen the masked & armed Muslim gangs during the Southport protests

This is why our leaders hate X.

It stops them controlling the narrative.

[Crewkerne Man @CrewkerneMan]

Kemi Badenoch tore into Labour’s failed cabinet at PMQs, accusing them of abandoning Keir Starmer for “a pair of eyelashes and a black T-shirt, savage swipe at Andy Burnham’s bizarre appearance.

Glorious from Kemi. Sharp, fearless, and brutal.

[Right over Left Everytime @RightSide_Uk]

Tony Blair has been enthusiastically promoting the fusion of digital ID, facial recognition, and artificial intelligence as a great leap forward for society. He speaks of real-time identification of suspects from live video feeds, AI systems that detect crime patterns, direct police patrols, and automate decision-making. According to him, digital ID is essential to making all of this work.
The pitch sounds efficient and modern. In reality, it represents a significant step towards a permanent surveillance infrastructure that could track every citizen’s movements, associations, and online activity in unprecedented detail. This is the same man who led Britain into an illegal war on false pretences and who has long operated as a globalist operative advancing agendas that erode national sovereignty.
Consider the context in which this technology would operate. The current government already arrests around 12,000 people every year for what they post on social media. That figure alone demonstrates a willingness to use the power of the state to police speech and thought. Handing such a regime tools that can instantly identify, locate, and monitor individuals in public spaces creates an obvious risk of abuse on a far larger scale.
Real crime — grooming gangs, knife attacks, and the consequences of mass uncontrolled immigration — has often been met with hesitation or two-tier responses. Yet the machinery for cracking down on online dissent appears well-oiled. Facial recognition and AI-driven systems would supercharge that imbalance, allowing authorities to target patriots, critics of mass migration, or anyone questioning official narratives with surgical precision.
Britain does not need another layer of digital control dressed up as public safety. The British people have already seen how institutions prioritise certain political outcomes over equal justice and free expression. Adding comprehensive surveillance technology to that mix would further entrench a system that treats native concerns as problems to be managed rather than legitimate views to be heard.
Digital ID linked to facial recognition and AI is not a neutral tool. It is infrastructure for a control grid. The British public should reject it outright. True security comes from secure borders, effective policing without political bias, and the preservation of the liberties that once defined this country — not from handing ever more power to the same globalist figures who have already done so much damage.

[spiked @spikedonline]

Keir Starmer was an authoritarian posing as a liberal. He waged war on trial by jury. He wanted to crush criticism of Islam. He tried to police our fury over Henry Nowak. He had a deep distrust of the public. Thank God he’s gone, says Brendan O’Neill
https://t.co/2WHAeOgl9b

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Vile attempts by Zack Polanski, Humza Yousaf and many others to demonise me following the release of our rape gang inquiry report will not work.

For decades the mass rape of vulnerable white girls by gangs of Pakistani Muslims was covered up exactly because of efforts like this.

It will not work anymore.

There is a clear link between religion and these abhorrent crimes that have stained on our nation for so very long.

That religion is Islam, and other politicians must finally find the courage to say so.

Threats, abuse and intimidation will not work.

We have held our hearings, the report has been published and now we move onto the private prosecution phase.

Our aim is to put rapists and their enablers in prison.

That is now our objective.

[Zia Yusuf @ZiaYusufUK]

Burnham has no manifesto.

No mandate.

Just 0.03% of the British people voted for him.

WE NEED A GENERAL ELECTION NOW!

[Sarah Pochin MP @SarahForRuncorn]

Keir Starmer’s emotion was not for his country.

It was not for the victims of grooming gangs, for whom he denied a full inquiry for so long.

It was not for Armed Forces veterans still living under the shadow of prosecution.

It was not for the small business owners pushed to the brink by him and Rachel Reeves, who have tried to turn Britain into an enterprise free zone.

It was not for the millions of pensioners stripped of their Winter Fuel Allowance when he first took office.

And not for the millions of British people he branded “far right” because they objected to seeing tens of thousands of illegal migrants cross the Channel after he failed to smash the gangs.

Whoever next occupies No. 10 would do well to remember this: put Britain and the British people last, and you will not be there for long.

[Nile Gardiner @NileGardiner]

It has taken a bit longer than a few weeks, but awful @Keir_Starmer is finally heading for the exit.

As I said in this interview with @GBNEWS this Labour government is "rotten to the core" and there should be an early general election. Andy Burnham will have zero legitimacy and credibility as PM.