When you die, you take nothing with you. Religions are by heart, devotion and not structures. Babri Masjid, Hagia Sophia...many more to add to the list of promoting division, complex. But secularism is contagious !
And how will you change that?
This woman threw ink at Abhijeet Dipke.
Immediately after the incident, IT Cell started running the narrative that she is the mother of a NEET aspirant, and was frustrated to see protestors not talking about NEET.
Fact: She is Barkha Trehan– a self-appointed MRA and Modi fan. The drama was probably her attempt to get noticed by BJP leaders.
Earlier, she has also sought ‘justice’ for Kuldeep Sengar – a BJP leader convicted for rape.
"What happened today with Sonam sir was not right
Peaceful protest is everyone's right,the protest at Jantar Mantar shows that Gandhinian strategy works & it reaps outcomes
All shud take part in the 20th July rally to Parliament & do it peacefully"
Peak Queen Behaviour 🔥
I request the authorities not to cut off the water supply to the restrooms at the Jantar Mantar protest site.
Since last night there’s no water supply at the public restrooms.
There are leaders who speak for the youth, and then there are leaders who choose to walk with them.
At a time when millions of young Indians were struggling for jobs, justice and a fair chance, you stood with them, listened to them and fought for them.
Your courage in the face of relentless attacks, and your unwavering faith in the dreams of young India continue to inspire an entire generation.
Wishing my leader, my mentor and the voice of millions of young Indians, Shri @RahulGandhi ji, a very Happy Birthday.
The fight for every dream continues. 🇮🇳
GD BAKSHI PUTS MODI GOVT ON THE SPOT 🔥
When the Minab school attack happened, we stayed silent.
Now our own ships have been attacked. Three of our people are dead.
Did they touch China’s ship? Did they dare touch Russia’s ship?
No. They picked us because we kept saying, “friend, friend.”
If this is friendship, then enemies are better.
When the teleprompter is not there he needs cue cards to help him speak on the world stage.
This is the reality of Mahamanav
Can't even speak 2 lines without a cue card or a teleprompter
@KartiPC@NTA_Exams You should also shut down all the shopping malls since there might be a theft in one of them. And close the roads because I heard someone was speeding.
This is the front page of our newspapers today. Of course no hashtags or outrage for these 5 IAF men because not all soldiers are equal. Our nationalism and outrage is restricted for soldiers killed in Kashmir
kota me bachho ke suicide rokne ke liye fans ke aage grills laga di thi
neet ka exam rokne ke liye telegram ban kar diya
sarkaar me sabka IQ double digit se neeche hai kya?
I think acting dumb is mandatory when you join BJP, so that Ranga Billa can appear to be the most intelligent person in the party.
Just look at Annamalai, he started making sense as soon as he left the BJP.
😭
The Biggest Mistake in Bail Matters? Arguing the Entire Trial at the Bail Stage...
A courtroom exchange before the #SupremeCourt today offers an important lesson in bail advocacy.
The counsel for the petitioner argued that the case was a blatant misuse of the rape law. Counsel submitted that the prosecutrix and the accused had never met physically and relied upon CDRs, which allegedly showed that they were kilometres apart. It was also argued that the prosecutrix herself had transferred ₹12,000 to the accused and that the accused had repeatedly offered to return the amount.
Counsel further questioned the investigation, pointing to FSL findings and alleged inconsistencies in the prosecution story.
At this stage, the Bench asked:
Court: "What could be any good reason for her to falsely implicate the accused?"
Counsel: "A property dispute is involved, My Lords."
The Court then focused on the admitted transfer of ₹12,000 and the accused's subsequent conduct.
Court: "At one stage you say you will return the money in the presence of the police. Then you say your bankers will investigate. Thereafter, before returning the amount, you appear to be offering employment or business opportunities. How do you explain these different stands?"
Counsel attempted to explain the position.
The Court was not persuaded.
Court: "Dismissed."
The exchange highlights an important point. The Court ultimately did not spend much time testing the technical evidence. Instead, it focused on perceived inconsistencies in the defence narrative.
A bail hearing is not a trial.
Before taking the Court deep into disputed facts, it is often more effective to address the traditional bail considerations:
• Criminal antecedents
• Age and personal circumstances
• Family dependents
• Duration of incarceration
• Flight risk
• Possibility of tampering with evidence
• Threat to the victim or witnesses
• Stage of investigation or trial
Only thereafter should the Court be invited to examine the broad merits of the case.
A bail application is not required to conclusively establish innocence. It must persuade the Court that liberty can safely be protected pending trial.
Sometimes, a deserving bail case becomes difficult not because of the facts, but because the argument moves from the principles governing bail into an attempt to conduct the entire trial at the bail stage..
#BailJurisprudence #CriminalLaw #SupremeCourt #LitigationStrategy #Advocacy