.@POTUS: We're taking nearly $200M that was set aside for the Green New Scam, and repurposing that money so that we can restart a coal plant in Maryland, and help build two brand new coal plants in Alaska and West Virginia.
@JackDangerLIVE Well... someone is lying and everyone needs to research it for themselves base on all available knowledge. I posted this video below on a bunch of ALPHA-Gal related threads. I hope it helps.
OP: @HomesteadAmeric
A man spends 50 years teaching at MIT.
He knows his time is running out.
So he records one last lecture — everything he knows, distilled into a single hour.
He died 5 months later.
This is that lecture.
The most important hour you'll watch this week. 👇
Bookmark it for later
@the_jefferymead left-wing programming on top of broken schooling system/indoctrination --- search: Deliberate Dumbing Down - Charlotte did great work on the subject 50yrs. ago
New York's official voter history records show 233,319 people recorded as voting twice in the 2020 general election, by two different methods.
That is the voter history field — the official record of who voted and how. At face value, that is 233,319 double votes.
The standard objection will be: database error. My answer is twofold.
First, the voter history field is the official record. It says what it says. If someone wants to argue these represent errors rather than actual double votes, they need to prove it. "It might be an error" is not a rebuttal. It is a hypothesis that requires its own evidence.
Second, even if every single one is an error, 233,319 errors in one field for one election in one state is not a database you can certify an election on. The error defense does not exonerate the system. It condemns it through a different door.
But here is what makes this worse than a static anomaly.
The double vote count is not consistent across snapshots:
108 → 225,515 → 227,678 → 233,100 → 233,319
Errors do not grow. A mistake made in 2020 does not spontaneously become a larger mistake in 2023 and a larger one still in 2025. Someone is writing to these records years after the election closed.
And before anyone suggests the double vote changes explain this morning's post about changing voter totals — they do not. The total 2020 vote count grew by 3,704 across all snapshots. The double vote count grew by 233,211. These are entirely different phenomena, driven by different processes, both modifying the same certified historical record.
Two different mechanisms. One certified election. No document behind the signature.
🚨BOMBSHELL
Exclusive footage obtained by Townhall suggests judges can be bought with bribes in Ohio's immigration courts...and that's just the start of it.
"Okay, $50,000 I send everybody to you."