Sadik

[Sadik @SShabaj82]

@beowulf8591 @EpiriEtAlbaniae Again….. The easiest way to lose an argument is to replace sources with slurs. You claimed to have ‘statistical facts,’ yet all you’ve offered is a list of insults. Historians call that prejudice, not evidence. Bigot.

[Sadik @SShabaj82]

@beowulf8591 @EpiriEtAlbaniae You wrote three paragraphs of insults but didn’t refute a single sentence from the book. That’s not a rebuttal—it’s a tantrum. Emotional breakdown.

[Sadik @SShabaj82]

@EpiriEtAlbaniae History isn’t a Marvel movie. ‘Christian = advanced’ and ‘Muslim = primitive’ isn’t how ACTUAL historians describe the 15th century.

[Sadik @SShabaj82]

@Dagmar_E @67_robayo @AscensoInfinitx “But whoever is compelled by necessity, neither desiring it nor transgressing its limit, there is no sin upon him.”

— Qur’an 2:173

[Sadik @SShabaj82]

@Dagmar_E @67_robayo @AscensoInfinitx I know what hunger feels like—I fast. But hunger doesn’t change the principle. If survival is at stake, Islam already makes exceptions. The existence of an exception doesn’t turn everything into food.

[Sadik @SShabaj82]

@Dagmar_E @67_robayo @AscensoInfinitx Are we supposed to conclude that everything living is automatically meant to be eaten?
My point was simple: the fact that something exists doesn’t mean it was created for human consumption. Pointing to unusual exceptions doesn’t really change that. God makes the rules, not us.

[Sadik @SShabaj82]

@Dagmar_E @67_robayo @AscensoInfinitx I was talking about the major monotheistic religions, not every custom practiced somewhere on Earth. By that logic, some people have eaten cats, some eat dogs, and some cultures have even practiced cannibalism.

[Sadik @SShabaj82]

@67_robayo @AscensoInfinitx Pigs, for example, have ecological roles and are part of creation regardless of whether humans eat them. The fact that something exists does not automatically mean it is intended as food. Would you eat a cat or dog?

[Sadik @SShabaj82]

@limao75 @AscensoInfinitx Life expectancy is not “much higher”it’s 2-3 years. Now check the cancer rates in Spain compared to Muslim majority countries. At least doubled.

[Sadik @SShabaj82]

@CedarsAndSaints So the argument isn’t “Jesus copied Islam.” The argument is that Islam, as submission to God, is the timeless message that Muslims believe all prophets taught.

[Sadik @SShabaj82]

@CedarsAndSaints In fact, Muslims believe this message predates both Christianity and Judaism as organized religions, going back to the first human beings and prophets. The Qur’an even describes Abraham as neither a Jew nor a Christian, but one who submitted himself to God.

[Sadik @SShabaj82]

@SusanPatto32151 @David_Y3 Pre-Islamic origins (long before Islam)
Ancient Mesopotamia 1200 BCE
-Assyrian law codes required elite women to veil in public
-Veiling was a class marker, not religious:
-Free, respectable women must veil
-Slaves and prostitutes forbidden to veil

[Sadik @SShabaj82]

@whitefreeze02 @David_Y3 They also called Jesus son of David
•Matthew 1:1
“The book of the genealogy of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.”
•Matthew 9:27
“Two blind men followed him, crying aloud, ‘Have mercy on us, Son of David!’”
•Mark 10:47–48
“Jesus, Son of David, have mercy on me

[Sadik @SShabaj82]

@washyuneed @TheDeenShow There’s only 1 creator

[Sadik @SShabaj82]

@denise_gil12468 @A_Y_Rafindadi The literal meaning of Muslim is “one who submits" or "one who surrenders" to the will of God.

“Not my will, but Yours be done.
Luke 22:42

Matthew 26:39
“My Father… not as I will, but as You will.”

All the prophets submitted their will to the almighty

[Sadik @SShabaj82]

@ppngoche @freemonotheist The literal meaning of Muslim is “one who submits" or "one who surrenders" to the will of God.

“Not my will, but Yours be done.
Luke 22:42

Matthew 26:39
“My Father… not as I will, but as You will.”

All the prophets submitted their will to the almighty