BEAST GAME EPISODE 3 IS OUT NOW!
To celebrate, I'm giving away $100,000 total to 10 random people who like and retweet this post!
Go watch it here: https://t.co/Yntf9E7FTN
@Venti1322@frankdegods yeah this could work too but the whole point w the original structure is devs dont have to dump on you to generate funding for developments
this was always the meme in shitcoins, devs would dump the chart for tens of thousands of dollars and say they needed it to do something
@frankdegods@The__Solstice What if instead of 5-10% royalties projects reserve 5-10% of supply?
Shifting incentives from driving volume to increasing value?
@CameronSmithNFT @y00tsNFT yeah, I’m pumped. not even worried about our collections. just saw the topic trending and always lose brain cells from the discussion.
mfers saying NFT projects should have alternative streams of revenue.
while i agree with this idea in theory… i just hope people know this means:
• more shitty 2nd gens
• founders will “advise” other projects
• you’re gonna get charged $300 for a hoodie for ur $300 jpeg
NFT royalties shouldn’t exist because it’s “the right thing to do”.
It is simply the best alignment of incentives between founders & holders (right now).
If you want to remove royalties, that’s fine. Just don’t be mad when mints become more expensive and more projects rug, lol.