通りすがりの統計家🇵🇸

統計(左)と意味構造(右)の仮面ライダーW。 ドーパント(*1)にマキシマムドライブ(*2)を決めて、全体主義に抗う。 *1 シオニストあるいはシンギュラリティ教徒 *2 批判的思考を取り戻させる対話

[通りすがりの統計家🇵🇸 @STATister]

人間は言葉を返す存在を「心ある他者」とみなし、流暢で一貫した応答に「真実らしさ」を感じやすい。
LLMは本来ただの確率生成器にすぎない、あるいは、超高度に抽象圧縮された「概念のインターネット」であるにもかかわらず、この認知傾向によって、あたかも「真実を映す魔法の鏡」のように誤認される。

この錯覚は生理的に避けがたいが、問題はそれが「hype」によって意図的に増幅されることにある。
hypeとは単なる熱狂ではなく、錯覚に囚われやすい人間を利用する宣伝の力であり、まさに「邪悪な意思」として機能する。そこではAIは「正解生成機」や「魔法の鏡」として演出され、人々は検証を放棄し、無力感に苛まれ、依存、自己強化、信仰へと誘導される。

その帰結として、個人は批判的思考を失い、責任を外部化し、凡庸な悪が蔓延し、民主的熟議は弱まり、誤情報やプロパガンダは強化され、格差と不平等は拡大し、ついには社会全体が全体主義へと傾斜する危険に晒される。危うさはLLMそのものではなく、錯覚 → hype → 操作という連鎖がもたらす社会構造の変容にあるのだ。

ゆえに、人間には修練と責任が問われているのだ。

[通りすがりの統計家🇵🇸 @STATister]

ユダヤ人に謎の力があるから危険なのではない
ユダヤ人に謎の力があると信じる認知モデルが危険なのだ
特定民族に犯罪性、寄生性、侵略性、劣等性、支配欲、裏切り性みたいなものを本質属性と見做してはならない
それは現実を説明せず、むしろ現実観測を壊し、介入も壊れる
すると世界が焼ける

[通りすがりの統計家🇵🇸 @STATister]

社会問題、政治問題、経済問題、安全保障問題の原因を、特定の民族・人種・出自集団の本質的性質へ単純還元してはならない

[通りすがりの統計家🇵🇸 @STATister]

社会問題、政治問題、経済問題、安全保障問題の原因を、特定の民族・人種・出自集団の本質的性質へ単純還元してはならない

[通りすがりの統計家🇵🇸 @STATister]

反ユダヤ主義だけを特権的に禁忌化するからややこしくなる

社会問題の原因を特定民族の性質などへ短絡する因果モデルを、一律に禁忌とせよ

薄っぺらい民族愛国主義全般が該当する

地政学と物語による協力が因果の本体だ

これは全体主義に対するリスクベースドアプローチだ

[通りすがりの統計家🇵🇸 @STATister]

悪いのは「ユダヤ人」ではない。
悪いのは、民族を因果モデルの説明変数として本質化する認知だ。
悪いのは「イスラエル人」でもない。
批判対象は、シオニズム、国家暴力、占領、入植、軍事装置、宗教的・歴史的物語の政治利用だ。

[通りすがりの統計家🇵🇸 @STATister]

反ユダヤ主義とは、ユダヤ人の問題ではなく、ユダヤ人という記号を使って世界を誤読する側の認知の病理である。
シオニズム批判を反ユダヤ主義と混同することは、その病理を克服するどころか、むしろユダヤ人とイスラエル国家を同一化する危険な迷信を延命させる
シオニズムは打倒されるべきである

[通りすがりの統計家🇵🇸 @STATister]

@AssalRad @nytimes @AP @washingtonpost @CNN @SkyNews これが文明世界の大事件として扱われていないのはなぜか

[Assal Rad @AssalRad]

A new UN report says Israel is committing genocide by DELIBERATELY TARGETING PALESTINIAN CHILDREN and I can’t find anything about it from @nytimes @AP @washingtonpost @CNN @SkyNews…

How is this not the top headline at every major news outlet?

[通りすがりの統計家🇵🇸 @STATister]

https://t.co/gQRKLTHHhu

本当にシオニズムは度し難い

[通りすがりの統計家🇵🇸 @STATister]

国連憲章上、安全保障理事会が「平和への脅威」などを認定し、制裁や軍事措置を含む第7章の枠組みに乗せる必要があるから、国連憲章42条は、非軍事措置では不十分な場合に、安保理が空海陸軍による行動を取れると定めている訳で、それに十分該当する状況だろう
米国が拒否する動機が低下した今こそ

[Ihtesham Ali @ihtesham2005]

A Russian psychologist spent 10 years proving that the act of talking to yourself out loud is one of the most powerful cognitive tools the human brain has, and almost nobody outside his field has read the work.

His name was Lev Vygotsky.

He worked in Moscow in the 1920s and died of tuberculosis in 1934 at the age of 37. He had no laboratory, no funding, almost no English readers, and a body of work that the Soviet government suppressed for two decades after he died.

He produced the foundational theory of how human cognition actually develops, and the central piece of that theory was a behavior almost every adult is faintly embarrassed about.

Vygotsky noticed that young children talk to themselves constantly. They narrate their own actions, they argue with imaginary opponents, they instruct themselves through tasks out loud.

The dominant theory at the time, from the Swiss psychologist Jean Piaget, said this was a sign of cognitive immaturity that children would eventually grow out of as they learned to think properly.

Vygotsky said the exact opposite.

He argued that this self-directed speech was the most important cognitive event in the entire developmental window, because it was the moment a child first started to use language as a tool to control their own mind. The child was not failing to think. The child was learning how to think by externalizing the process and listening to themselves do it.

He predicted that as children matured, this out-loud self-talk would not disappear. It would go underground. It would become silent inner speech, which is the running monologue every adult has inside their own head for the rest of their life.

The voice you hear when you read this sentence is the direct descendant of a four-year-old narrating their own block tower.

For 50 years almost nobody outside Russia had access to his work, and the few researchers who did pick it up could not get funding to test it. Then in the early 2000s the experiments finally started to pile up, and what they found was that Vygotsky had been right about something even more important than he knew.

The first major study came from Gary Lupyan at the University of Wisconsin and Daniel Swingley at the University of Pennsylvania in 2012. They ran a simple visual search experiment. Participants were shown 20 images at once and asked to find a specific object, like a banana or a chair. In one condition they searched silently. In the other condition they were told to say the name of the object out loud to themselves while looking for it.

The participants who spoke the target name out loud found the object significantly faster, with higher accuracy, than the participants who searched in silence. The effect was strongest when the spoken word matched a familiar object the brain already had a strong category for.

Saying the word out loud literally tuned the visual system to detect that thing better. The researchers called it the label feedback effect, and the implication was that the act of vocalizing a goal physically changes how the brain processes the world while pursuing it.

The second major study came out of the University of Michigan and Michigan State in 2017. The lead researchers were Ethan Kross and Jason Moser, and they used both EEG and fMRI to record what happens inside the brain when people talk to themselves while emotionally upset.

They asked participants to recall painful autobiographical memories and reflect on them in two different ways. Some used the first person, saying things like "why am I feeling this way." Others used the third person, referring to themselves by their own name, saying things like "why is John feeling this way."

The brain scans showed that the simple act of switching from first person to third person, even silently, decreased activity in the medial prefrontal cortex, the region responsible for rumination and self-referential pain. Within a single second of using their own name instead of the word I, participants showed measurably lower emotional reactivity. The shift required no extra cognitive effort. It cost the brain nothing. And it worked.

Kross described the mechanism in his interviews. Talking to yourself by name creates a small amount of psychological distance from your own experience. Your brain processes the situation more like a problem belonging to someone else, which means it can analyze it instead of drowning in it.

What Vygotsky had intuited in 1934 turned out to be even more powerful than the developmental theory he built it into. The voice you use to talk to yourself is not background noise. It is one of the most precise cognitive tools the brain has, and you can change how it works just by changing the pronoun you use.

People who talk through problems out loud are not anxious or unstable. They are running an externalized version of a process the rest of us are running silently and worse. The kindergartener narrating their block tower, the surgeon muttering through a procedure, the engineer pacing a hallway describing a bug to nobody, the athlete repeating a cue to themselves before a free throw, they are all using the same ancient mechanism that builds and steers human thought.

You can run the experiment yourself the next time you are stuck on something hard. Stop trying to solve it silently in your head. Say it out loud. Describe what you are seeing. Walk yourself through the steps as if you were explaining it to a colleague who is not in the room.

And when something genuinely upsets you, switch to your own name. Ask why this person is feeling this way, instead of why I am feeling this way.

The voice you have been told to keep quiet your entire life is one of the oldest pieces of cognitive technology you own.

Most people are still embarrassed to use it.

[neyi kaybettiğini hatırla @neyikaybettik]

— Kim öldürdü bu çocukları?
— Ey özgür dünya bize (buraya) bakın!
— Bu mazlum halka yapılan gerçek katliam karşısında neredesiniz?

Gazze'de bir sağlık çalışanı, İsrail tarafından öldürülen çocukların cesetlerinin başında dünya kamuoyunun olanlar karşısındaki sessizliğine tepki gösterdi

[通りすがりの統計家🇵🇸 @STATister]

@jackcoder0 この論文は、AIによる過剰自動化の需要外部性を示しているが、技術革新の核心であるタスク創出、需要創出、職能再編、価格低下による実質所得効果を外生化している。経済を発見過程ではなく、既存タスクの配分問題として扱っており、ごく局所の洞察を与えるにとどまる。

[通りすがりの統計家🇵🇸 @STATister]

今に始まったことではないが、巨人の監督の話、を見る人々を見て思うこと

[Jvnior @Jvnior]

WATCH: Baby fetus removed from Palestinian mother womb who was just killed by Israel

I don’t want to live in this world anymore.

[Israel Exposed @xIsraelExposedx]

There are so many massacres of children by Israel that it is impossible to count them all.

[通りすがりの統計家🇵🇸 @STATister]

自分は中道左派を自認する。

左右とは、理性にどの程度の信頼を置くかのバランスであり、選択問題ではない。

極端が行き着く先は、どちらも全体主義だ。
極左は「正しい理性」の名のもとに、極右は「正しい伝統」の名のもとに、問いを殺す。

自分は、これに敵対するものであり、人間の問いを信じる

[通りすがりの統計家🇵🇸 @STATister]

@sureidea @Fx1Jonny シオニズムはテロリズムを実行する全体主義思想だ

[JonnyUtd @Fx1Jonny]

GRAPHIC WARNING ⚠️

I remember this video back when this 1st happened.

What the zionist evil regime did to this child’s face and some many 1000’s more like her will never ever leave my memory. 💔💔💔 😔😢 https://t.co/cXaMYTvPhG

[渡邉究/数学科教員/KADOKAWAより「すごすぎる数の図鑑」発売中/YouTube @Kiwamu_Watanabe]

「数学はもう終わり」と言う引用元の動画の人は数学者ではない。
数学の研究は、用意された問題を解くゲームではない。
まず何を問題にすべきか、そのために何を定義すべきか、どの現象を本質とみて研究するか。数学の研究はそれらの営みすべてを含む。ベンチマークが伸びていることは重要。AIが数学の研究に深く入ってきているのも間違いない。
でも、そこから「数学は終わり」は飛躍が大きすぎる。
数学をよく知らない外野の終末論に近い。

[Israel Exposed @xIsraelExposedx]

Martyrs and injured butchered by an israeli drone on a group of citizens in the vicinity of Tawam roundabout in northwest Gaza. God have mercy on them. https://t.co/iHgUhoLZsO