Australian entrepreneur with broad interests across diplomacy, defence, branding & communications. Advocate for a stronger, more consistent National brand 🦘
@JAParker29 Absolutely. I reckon the approach makes a lot of sense for patrol too, with the inherent seakeeping, range, endurance and multipurpose utility of large civilian offshore support vessel designs.
Just to clarify, *meaningful* fleet growth, not just getting back to 11/12 major surface combatants.
Seriously, what are they doing at Osborne, and why aren’t we utilising Civmec in partnership with Austal?
The vague timelines for Henderson builds don’t provide much confidence - especially given the track record of the department over the last two decades.
If there’s any desire for fleet growth before the 40s, the timelines and plan for both Hunter & New FFM don’t make any sense.
The Australian Department of Defence has negotiated a contingency option to build a fourth 06FFM Upgraded Mogami in Japan if the Western Australia naval shipyard construction schedule slips. Details, program, systems, weaponry, pix https://t.co/67ezJG8tF5
@FennellJW@NavyLookout Not at all, but the problem is trying to treat it as a silver bullet solution, without nailing, and proving, the natural fits first.
I’m once again left with the question, where are the persistent towed array LUSVs?
Dispersed sensor platforms conducting dull, persistent work should be truly proven before jumping to paper concepts of missile carrying silver bullets that don’t even result in parity on paper
@FennellJW@NavyLookout Conops, international law, perception? Pretty critical differences yet to be proven even before considering actual wartime and combat.
@JAParker29@Wembridge@FinancialReview I couldn’t agree more. Worth noting that a certain Italian shipbuilder’s US subsidiary is indirectly majority owned by the Italian State via Gov investment entities.
A worthy area for extensive R&D? Absolutely. But to make it a key part of a nation’s force structure at this concept stage is a level of groupthink and grave negligence beyond belief.
@JAParker29 Honestly, if they were smart they wouldn’t have publicised any forensic assistance as it would play right into the well known PRC narrative.