PC

[PC @SWFL_Chicago_DC]

@thekaceykasem I feel for you. My pup was diagnosed with cancer 4 months before he turned 6. We had a great time together the next 5 months, but the last month, I struggled to let him go. Miss you buddy.

[PC @SWFL_Chicago_DC]

@SigmundBloom Watching Ben Johnson tear through a good defense with Keenum- give me that over big contracts for QBs that are limited passers but have the athleticism to compensate for mediocre OC

[PC @SWFL_Chicago_DC]

@Ihartitz So close to being able to sell Hampton

[PC @SWFL_Chicago_DC]

@Dalgby It's not a question of legality, it is a question of your perversion

You fetish freaks are sickening

[PC @SWFL_Chicago_DC]

@SundanceKidSr @MichaelSalfino It is battery. If he had rough-up a male family member is a disagreement, we're not having this conversation and he's playing

People want the video not sealed because it's a women.

Stop infantilizing women. It's one of the primary drivers of actual DA

[PC @SWFL_Chicago_DC]

@SundanceKidSr @MichaelSalfino Society.
First, remember, this isn't DA. It's battery.

Second, if he had been charged with battery against a man, this isn't an issue. With the NFL or society in general. NFL only cares about public opinion

[PC @SWFL_Chicago_DC]

@SundanceKidSr @MichaelSalfino When it's a women, you just get a bunch of simps infantilizing women

[PC @SWFL_Chicago_DC]

@cochranoak72353 @TheSeigeDFS It wasn't implied that a SA case was what we're talking about

But no one would react with "it should be made public" in an SA case. Which has been the reaction is this case. Odd distinction, whether it be a legal one or public opinion one

[PC @SWFL_Chicago_DC]

@TheSeigeDFS @cochranoak72353 Right, imagine people saying a tape of SA should be public so people can see it.

So we're saying it is okay to be against the victim's wishes on DA but not SA? odd take

[PC @SWFL_Chicago_DC]

@pocketjoe @RobDemovsky Why?
The victim should be the one to determine that. If it were SA, I bet you'd change your tune.

[PC @SWFL_Chicago_DC]

@FAmmiranteTFJ He was likely a wavier add. Selling now is taking a small profit to avoid a very small loss. Lotto ticket price, already a flex. HOLD

[PC @SWFL_Chicago_DC]

@FAmmiranteTFJ @DrJesseMorse What was the top fantasy receiver on the Bears last year?
Likely too much dispersion. Worth a bench spot, but no one is selling them at bench costs in my leagues

[PC @SWFL_Chicago_DC]

@SigmundBloom @gustavocheatey Very easy. Close before the season. Now Ladd's target hogging has been confirmed, meanwhile Nabers has QB uncertainty and a new injury. If Giants are bad, wouldn't be surprised Nabers misses time

[PC @SWFL_Chicago_DC]

@JordanMcninch @SigmundBloom @MattHarmon_BYB Too early to do that imo. Would want at least two for-sure starters. Jeanty and a P Washington type

[PC @SWFL_Chicago_DC]

@Dr_TobogScog_Jr @DrJesseMorse Puka for St Brown isn't selling low. Etienne for Barkley is only selling low on hype- this isn't 2024 Barkley. Was out-scored by Etienne last year & Etienne even in low-usage role was 2 plays from scoring far more points. Add in availability risk & my other RB is Monty (Marks)

[PC @SWFL_Chicago_DC]

@tommywalkwestan @DrJesseMorse They have more production than Parker and Etienne. Fools chase ADP and brands.

But more than anything, they are not as zero as injured players.

[PC @SWFL_Chicago_DC]

@_yurgs @ImSorenJoseph @DrJesseMorse He's target rate is likely to go up without Jayden.
Diggs has less upside than Parker, but the EV is far closer than you're alluding to, and a tenable price to risk off.

[PC @SWFL_Chicago_DC]

@ImSorenJoseph @DrJesseMorse Brown> Puka
Etienne & Barkley both buy lows. Etienne TD called back & subbed himself out on Miller's GM1 TD. Also more productive than Barkley in 2025
Parker tough to give up, but tenable price to get out of injury risk on 2 players & Diggs has been equally productive