Steve Zivalich

[Steve Zivalich @SZivalich]

Using the shadow docket the Republican justices are hiding and not having to defend or give any legal reasons for why they ruled as they did! Effectively gutting the voting rights act and the 14th amendment! Maga voted for this! https://t.co/5wjBFNgILn

[Steve Zivalich @SZivalich]

@vanillaice @YouTube You truly are stupid! You don't vote! Music not political? Really so stating you are a selfish, entitled twit!

[Steve Zivalich @SZivalich]

@RapidResponse47 @SenRonJohnson Stop the lying! You are a paid shill for trump and maga!

[Steve Zivalich @SZivalich]

@TodayUpdates0 Never have or will trust this corrupt administration and it's sycophants! 86 47!

[Steve Zivalich @SZivalich]

@RobSchneider You truly are an ass! STFU

[Steve Zivalich @SZivalich]

@CurtisHouck Since you advocate violence on others, I guess that means I can physically pound on you for your viewpoints. Good to know.

[Steve Zivalich @SZivalich]

@Ivankatrumpne That he is correct! You and your husband as a bad as your father.

[Steve Zivalich @SZivalich]

@Mohiniuni Claude

[Steve Zivalich @SZivalich]

@KristanHawkins @RepMaryMiller You and she are idiots and true C U next Tuesdays!

[Steve Zivalich @SZivalich]

@WhiteHouse You're an idiot!

[NORML @NORML]

😚💨 Researchers reported that those with a history of cannabis use "demonstrated significantly better cognitive performance" and that  use "was not associated with increased risk of dementia."
https://t.co/1PoKqBaHdX

[Steve Zivalich @SZivalich]

@Suryanshti777 4.6

[Steve Zivalich @SZivalich]

@Suryanshti777 AI

[Suryansh Tiwari @Suryanshti777]

4 AI tools. (Claude,ChatGPT,Gemini,Grok)

1 insane advantage.

I built a 100-prompt AI Power Pack for:

Claude
Gemini
ChatGPT
Grok

Use them for:
• coding
• content
• research
• automation

Giving it away FREE.

Like ❤️
Repost 🔁
Comment AI

I'll send it.

[Steve Zivalich @SZivalich]

@ACTBrigitte Trump and all MAGA

[💯1%_Better_Every_Day💯 @jh336405]

Oh please. This reads like someone discovered the French Revolution on Wikipedia at 2am and decided democracy is basically a Marvel villain origin story.

Let’s break this down.

“If you say people are politically equal, you inevitably get mass democracy.”

That’s like saying:
“If you build a gym, eventually someone’s going to lift weights.”

Yes. That’s… the point. Political equality → people vote. That’s not a design flaw. That’s the design.

And calling “consent of the governed” a myth because it’s never been perfect is like saying love isn’t real because no marriage is flawless. An ideal doesn’t have to be perfectly achieved to be foundational. Gravity isn’t perfectly measured either. Still works.

Now the big scary claim:
“Mass democracy ALWAYS leads to forced redistribution and endless bureaucracy.”

ALWAYS? Really?

Then explain why countries like Switzerland, Norway, Canada, and Australia aren’t dystopian gulags run by bread-rationing commissars.

Democracy doesn’t automatically equal redistribution. It equals voters deciding policy. Sometimes that means social programs. Sometimes it means tax cuts. That’s called politics. The horror.

The “infinite expansion of made-up rights” line is my favorite.

You mean like:
•Abolishing slavery?
•Women voting?
•Civil rights?
•Religious freedom?

Yeah, those were once considered dangerous expansions too. Every generation’s “made-up right” is just the previous generation’s “obviously insane radical demand.”

If you went back to 1850 and said women should vote, people would say it would destroy civilization. It didn’t. Civilization somehow survived the horror of women marking ballots.

Now let’s talk about the Jacobins.

Yes, Jacobins during the Reign of Terror were brutal. But comparing that to constitutional democracies today is like saying because a plane crashed once, airplanes inevitably become missiles.

The Reign of Terror lasted about a year during revolutionary chaos.

Meanwhile, Louis XIV ruled for 72 years with:
•No elections
•No civil rights
•Censorship
•Religious persecution
•Arbitrary imprisonment

But sure — the guy who said “I am the state” was basically a chill libertarian compared to voters electing city council members.

The argument also sneaks in something funny:

It says democracy becomes more coercive than monarchies.

Under monarchies:
•You didn’t vote.
•You didn’t choose your rulers.
•You could be imprisoned without due process.
•Power was literally inherited by bloodline.

Under democracies:
•You vote.
•You sue the government.
•You protest publicly.
•You replace leaders peacefully.

If this is “more coercive,” then by that logic a homeowners’ association is more tyrannical than feudalism because you can vote on lawn regulations.

The real move here is rhetorical sleight of hand:

Step 1: Equate democracy with mob rule.
Step 2: Equate mob rule with the French Revolution.
Step 3: Pretend modern liberal democracies are just Robespierre waiting to happen.

That’s like saying because surgery involves cutting people, all doctors are basically serial killers with better lighting.

Mass democracy doesn’t automatically create tyranny. Concentrated unchecked power does. And historically, that’s been monarchs, dictators, and one-party regimes — not societies where power changes hands every few years because voters are annoyed about gas prices.

The irony is thick:
The argument claims equality leads to tyranny… while defending systems where one guy literally rules by divine right.

That’s not an argument against democracy.

That’s nostalgia for crowns.

[Steve Zivalich @SZivalich]

@Matt_Pinner Less than 0

[Steve Zivalich @SZivalich]

The colbert talerico interview

https://t.co/yFOSsNIiNX

[Steve Zivalich @SZivalich]

@Milajoy Really? Another MAGA TOOL!

[Steve Zivalich @SZivalich]

@Riley_Gaines_ 😂😂😂😂 you are tied 5th place tool.