Alastair, you reacted to the wrong information you believed true in a most terrible way.
Just imagine how your video would make others respond believing it to be true.
(Hint) : RIP Charlie Kirk. ๐
Apologies for this. I had seen a clip on social media which did not have the full context, and had seen others making the same claim. The full exchange shows it was a debate about Biblical interpretation, not a call for the stoning of gay people. Kirk did have views with which I strongly disagree but this was not among them. Note to self - especially amid tragic and potentially deeply polarising events, be extra careful about social media, mis- and disinformation
@bphillipsonMP You have a magic spell to resolve climate related issues?
Learn to live with it and learn how to make the best of it.
Other Countries have done so successfully for decades.
@BohemianAtmosp1 I spent so long debating her online and she could never refute the actual facts.
She's found a way to make money. Morals are secondary.
@aak1880 So much hipocrisy in her speech.
I loved how she said not to cherry pick but conveniently cherry picked verses and statistics ignoring all others.
Agree with her all you like.
The facts are always more truthful
Do not allow your face to be scanned just to access social media.
DO NOT ALLOW IT.
No face scanning, no passport scanning, no giving them bank details, nothing.
Under no circumstances should you allow this.
Just DO NOT DO IT.
The future is in your hands.