sino

#crypto lover

[sino @SahibIsmayilo16]

@cwgoes But here it is impossible not to note the fact that by these unlockings this token managed to accumulate the necessary buyer base, that is, the necessary liquidity to absorb these unlocks.
This effect will not occur with a model without restrictions.

[sino @SahibIsmayilo16]

@zachxbt @adrianbrink It is worth noting that they have two projects.
1) Anoma - which has exactly all the declared investments. This project's token has lockups and vestings.
2) Namada is a project without investment. Here is a token with 100% unlocking.
Thats strange

[sino @SahibIsmayilo16]

@Ether_Gavin @zenerbabax @adrianbrink So let them then change the tokenomics of Anoma, because both @adrianbrink @cwgoes wrote about how they like the idea of ​​​​a “fair” price for Namada. I just see an inconsistency in this: in one case there is responsibility to investors, and in the other only to the community.

[sino @SahibIsmayilo16]

@adrianbrink When you chose tokenomics models for your two projects, what were you guided by?
Because of the investment made in Anoma, did you choose a classic lockup model for Anoma or what?

[sino @SahibIsmayilo16]

@adrianbrink Can you answer my questions under two of your past tweets? You have very contradictory thoughts.

[sino @SahibIsmayilo16]

@adrianbrink So, for the Anoma token, you chose the classic tokenomics model with lockup. So you do the same thing like everyone else?