@Spiritofmusk@dmoonlives Indeed. Women have a relationship filter. If she is in a conventional relationship with a guy she sees him as a failure. No matter how good looking or rich he is.
@fastrlife Tweets like the original show different. There was a video of Alan Ritchison circulating here just a week ago. It debunked the physiognomy theory in 20 seconds.
@tfmonkey3@CaudilloNuclear Not only money but spiritual control. No bigger brag for a woman that she has the man on a leash. The bigger the man she’s bagged the bigger the brag.
@FootbalGalaxy He has a very specific body frame which predisposes him to certain twitches. In many cases it gives him an advantage. In others however he looks ridiculous.
@Pat_Stedman More abstractions and beating around the bush. You keep avoiding calling out the perpetrators of the power games. People don’t play power games in dating. Women do. Men can’t afford it. Dating was turned into a zero sum game by women. Simple as.
@FrenchOG3 That was true 10 years ago when indeed there was a meta game and the delayed gratification strategy was worth it. Now we live in an era of an unprecedented transactionality. Incels get this one right. Even if their reaction to it (or the lack of it) is wrong.
@TW1NKD3STR0YER Yes. Extreme compartmentalisation that inevitably leads to endless transactionality. Known also as sociopathy. That’s the trick about it, you don’t realise you have it.