Salso Network

#SalsoNetwork

Harness Engineering, harness, AI, engineer, agent, or LLM.

[Salso Network @SalsoNetwork]

Stay active connect

Follow everyone back

Let's rise together # Target 10 k sir

[Salso Network @SalsoNetwork]

@sadia82105 Ready

[Salso Network @SalsoNetwork]

@crypto_mooncity Hi

[Salso Network @SalsoNetwork]

@AndrianiGio22 Hellow

[Salso Network @SalsoNetwork]

Who's verified and active for engagements comment below for growth.

Gain active followers below 🔽

Type,, Hit me .. I will bost your comment,, 🍓

[Salso Network @SalsoNetwork]

@SachinK2001 Hi all

[Salso Network @SalsoNetwork]

@DilipMe69892545 Ready

[Salso Network @SalsoNetwork]

@AndrianiGio22 Ready

[Salso Network @SalsoNetwork]

Who's verified and active for engagements comment below for growth.

Gain active followers below 🔽

Type,, Hit me .. I will bost your comment,, 🍓

[Salso Network @SalsoNetwork]

@AndrianiGio22 Ready guys ❤️

[Salso Network @SalsoNetwork]

@DeepSafe_AI The distinction is important: post quantum security protects the signature scheme, while MPC protects the authorization process. Will be success sir

[DeepSafe @DeepSafe_AI]

A pilot announced Monday is explicitly a post-quantum project. What it paired that with is the more interesting half.

The Responsible Fintech Institute convened the pilot; Safeheron leads the protocol work. Wallet generation and transfers are being tested on a quantum-resistant NEAR testnet, using an MPC protocol that supports ML-DSA-65 — one of the parameter sets standardized in NIST FIPS 204. Abu Dhabi Global Market, Malta's Financial Services Authority and Bhutan's Gelephu Financial Services Office are listed as regulatory participants, observing in the first phase; Bison Bank and DK Bank are the participating banks. Safeheron says the underlying protocol technology will eventually be open-sourced.

The pilot includes a "tentative" non-custodial 2-of-2 MPC participation design. Under that proposed policy, every signature would require both MPC participants; neither share would be sufficient on its own.

The pilot pairs a post-quantum signature scheme with a model in which no single share can produce a signature.

Post-quantum work matters, and it answers a different question: whether a signature scheme stays unforgeable against a quantum-capable adversary, not how many parties had to take part before one was produced. The pilot treats those as two requirements rather than one. That distinction is worth keeping.

CRVA starts from the second of those requirements. Under threshold MPC, signing authority is distributed: a valid signature requires contributions from enough participants, and no participant can produce one alone. That is a comparison about authorization structure, not a claim that CRVA uses ML-DSA.

Quantum resistance is a property of the signature scheme. Whether one party can authorize a transfer by itself is a property of the signing design.

Source: https://t.co/m7UzAGyb9U

#DeepSafe #CRVA #MPC

[Salso Network @SalsoNetwork]

@X_supporttop1 Ready

[Salso Network @SalsoNetwork]

@Mi_Zu_Ki_20 Yes

[Salso Network @SalsoNetwork]

@ZSvirt Good project

[ZSvirt @ZSvirt]

Evaluating a VMware alternative?
A PoC should be more than creating a VM.
1️⃣ Scope
2️⃣ Deploy
3️⃣ Operate
4️⃣ Verify
5️⃣ Migrate & validate
We put together a practical ZSvirt PoC guide.
Read the guide →https://t.co/eRUJ1MXdsN
#VMware #Virtualization #OpenSource

[Salso Network @SalsoNetwork]

@X_supporttop1 Hi

[Salso Network @SalsoNetwork]

@Vincent4T_ Help

[Salso Network @SalsoNetwork]

@ASM_Dish Hellow

[Salso Network @SalsoNetwork]

@crypto_daddy021 Support sir or madam

[Salso Network @SalsoNetwork]

@ASM_Dish Ready