.@FinanceCanada Minister misled Canadians on size of near-record 2025 deficit, according to new Budget Office figures. @FPChampagne predicted $65.4 billion deficit. True figure was $71.8 billion, said @PBO_DPB.
https://t.co/ASxVcVkOmC
#storytelling#cdnpoli
Senator Ron Johnson is clearly exasperated.
Then Oncology Professor Dr. Angus Dalgleish reveals the real scandal.
It’s how they sold “Pandemic of the Unvaccinated”.
And how they still sell the false claim “millions of lives were saved” by messenger RNA tech.
It creates the false illusion of more covid, more death, more illness in the unvaccinated group.
And all of those classified as unvaccinated, had actually had an injection which temporarily lowers immune cells (Lymphocytes) that protect your body against disease/infection.
DALGLEISH: “When it comes to side effects.. they basically said ‘we don’t have side effects for the vaccine until at least 14 days’ ... because that’s how long it takes an antibody to come.. so all the people who dropped down dead after 1 or 2 days, went down the list as unvaccinated”
Apparently they call this “science”.
His job is to engineer civil unrest, delivering a Digital ID mandate for his WEF handlers.
This isn’t about popularity — and it never was.
What’s unfolding feels increasingly calculated, not accidental.
A steady push of policy after policy, each one framed as efficiency, safety, or modernization — yet collectively pointing toward something far more rigid underneath.
Digital identity systems. Centralized verification frameworks. Expanding requirements to access basic services in an increasingly monitored environment.
Supporters call it progress. Critics see something else taking shape: a quiet tightening of control wrapped in the language of convenience.
And the most unsettling part isn’t just the direction — it’s how normal it’s being made to feel while it happens.
Because once these systems are fully embedded, walking them back becomes almost impossible.
At that point, it’s no longer about debate.
It’s about structure.
🇺🇦 A police officer has a gun to this poor guy's head because he doesn't want to fight in the war
This is the part of Ukraine's conscription Zelensky doesn't want the world to see
This is Ramsey. He is a mail delivery dog. Shipping is free, and while packages might not be handled with care, they are handled with enthusiasm. 14/10
But don’t forget that the @UWaterloo restricted their search for Canada Research Chaired professorships to non-binary, transgender, two-spirit, or racialized people. All these cases are covered in Suicidal Empathy. AI in Canada is rooted in kindness.
A new poll suggests that 33% of Canadians support the idea of government-run grocery stores.
My guess is that many within that 33% also believe that the primary reason food prices have risen over the past few years is grocer greed.
🚨🇨🇦 Canada’s top privacy law expert just said it out loud:
The same government talking about “protecting your privacy”
is pushing Bill C-22 — mandatory metadata retention of every Canadian’s communications.
Same day. Same government.
Michael Geist: “Pretty hard to talk credibly about privacy when you’re actively undermining it.”
He’s right. 🇨🇦
Video : @cbcwatcher
#Canada #Privacy
"At speeds not seen in generations"
Ottawa pumps the brakes on proposed changes to major project environmental reviews https://t.co/KF2mK4V6nZ #nationlnewswatch via @natnewswatch
Students who never study Stalin, Mao, and the gulags have no framework to recognize totalitarianism. A curriculum built on shame is not history. It is indoctrination. The left just tried to strip her damehood for saying so. My conversation with the newly appointed Dame Elizabeth Rata, in collaboration with @NZFreeSpeech
Canada's uneventful adoption of gay marriage in 2005 ended up persuading most of the West to follow suit. Right now we're seeing the opposite: On everything from euthanasia to harm reduction, Canada has screwed it up so badly the world is stampeding in the other direction.
“Police say (Jobanpreet) Singh was wanted on a Canada Border Services Agency warrant at the time of his arrest and was in Canada on a student visa.”
Let’s see if the judge gives him the ‘immigration consequences’ discount & negate the work of the police.
https://t.co/XKCLmrItCV
🚨 BOOM! Nick Ferrari just put Deputy PM David Lammy on the ropes LIVE on LBC! 🔥
“Would you take the knee for Henry Nowak?”
Lammy instantly flustered, stuttering like he’s been caught red-handed:
“Uhh… well I, look, I, I, I, I think… to honour what’s that family…”
Ferrari cuts through the waffle:
“It’s a yes or no, Mr Lammy. Would you take the knee for Henry Nowak?”
Lammy, clearly squirming:
“I think… no. Because, look, I don’t think the family are asking for symbolism. They’re asking for genuine common sense policing and a reduction in knife crime.”
Ferrari pounces:
“So you agree, taking the knee is mere symbolism? It was a bit of a charade at times?”
Lammy’s brain completely melts:
“That was a moment back then when we were still in the pandemic. This is today. This is this particular incident in our country that’s heart-rending.”
The pandemic?! What the actual f*ck has COVID got to do with it? 😂 His head had totally gone. Nick Ferrari absolutely broke him on air.
This is the same David Lammy who was one of the biggest cheerleaders for BLM, repeatedly defended taking the knee, slammed anyone who questioned it, and pushed the George Floyd narrative hard, yet suddenly it’s all “symbolism” and excuses when it’s a young British lad stabbed to death.
Well done, Nick Ferrari 👏 You exposed the hypocrisy and double standards for everyone to see. No wonder people are furious.
Helen Andrews made a bold point:
The more women dominate the legal system, the more justice risks becoming emotional storytelling and compassion theater instead of cold, neutral due process.
She points to Title IX campus courts and some MeToo cases where feelings and narratives often overrode evidence and procedure.
This is a sensitive but important conversation about how demographic shifts quietly reshape institutions. When emotion and group protection replace impartial rules, the rule of law weakens, and public safety eventually pays the price.
Do you think the growing feminization of law and other institutions is changing how justice is applied?