Southampton say they'll respond with humility at the end of statement which includes the following: 'The club has consistently believed the original sporting sanction was disproportionate, a view that has been widely shared by many in football community over the last 24 hours' 🙃
Boro family, can I have your attention please.
Our much loved fan from the land of Oz, no not the Wizard our very own @inrictus has a ticket sorted for Wembley. Trying to sort flights, very expensive for short notice. Would any of you amazing people be able to help?
Anyone who signed off on the multiple spying operations should be immediately sacked. Following the hearing it’s clearly systemic.
Utter embarrassment, what a waste of money for all the fans who travelled home and away.
We deserve full transparency from the club. #SaintsFC
If you get caught doping, that’s it. That’s the offence. You get banned. It doesn’t matter if you only finished fifth and it didn’t affect the podium places. Some transgressions are fundamental.
@slbsn My point was that it does not say explicitly say ‘Middlesbrough FC should be reinstated’ whatever interpretation you have of that statement is fair enough but my point was the statement does not say anything about reinstatement.
@jordan323323@slbsn I totally agree, it most likely won’t be the outcome but my point was that statement does not say Middlesbrough should be reinstated.
@slbsn Going with assumptions, are you assuming there is no chance hull, who are completely innocent in relation to this case, cannot be put through? Or do Middlesbrough explicitly say in that statement that Middlesbrough should take the place of Southampton.