🚨𝗠𝗔𝗝𝗢𝗥 𝗕𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚: David Beckham is planning a HISTORIC January transfer window at Inter Miami, with Cristiano Ronaldo and Neymar Jr both reportedly emerging as major targets alongside Lionel Messi.
Beckham wants to assemble an unbelievable attacking trio of Messi, Ronaldo and Neymar, giving football fans one final chance to witness three generational superstars playing together before retirement.
🚨 SUMMARY: The sexual allegations against David Walliams who fought to keep his name secret
- A Guardian and ITV News investigation reveals allegations from multiple women who claim Walliams used his celebrity status to pursue them sexually, including when some were underage
- A girl who was 15 when she first spoke to Walliams online in 2007 says he knew her age but continued messaging her, arranged to meet her and later took her to his house. She alleges he kissed her, lifted her top, sucked her breast and tried to put her hand down his trousers. She says she told him no and that he suggested they wait until she was 16. Walliams strongly denies any sexual contact with her
- Another girl, who was 15 when she met Walliams in 2004, says he was 32 and initially encouraged her interest in comedy, helped with her scripts and invited her backstage. She alleges that when she was 17, he began asking for increasingly sexual photos, including nude pictures, and sent her a message saying "you in the bath is a nice thought". She says they later had sex three times when she was 17 and 18. Although she describes the relationship as consensual, she says she felt pressured and that he was pushy. Walliams says he believed she was 18, denies pressuring her and says he believes he used a condom
- An 18-year-old woman says Walliams, then 31, contacted her in 2003 after seeing her on television. She says he offered her somewhere to stay when she was struggling, but repeatedly asked her to share his bed and touched her despite her not wanting to. She alleges he became angry and insulting when she refused sex. She never had sex with him and says she felt manipulated by his offers of help and career opportunities
- A 19-year-old woman says Walliams, then 36, invited her to dinner and later to a party at his home in 2007. She alleges he tried to kiss her in his bedroom, then became upset and angry when she tried to leave. She says he held her face and begged her to stay before eventually telling her and her friends to leave. Walliams says he made a clumsy pass but denies the rest of her account
- An 18-year-old woman who met him through Britain's Got Talent in 2016 says Walliams, then 44, invited her and a friend to his house. She alleges he stroked her leg, followed her to the bathroom and tried to kiss her. She says he later tried to lead her upstairs towards his bedroom, but her friend stopped him
- A 17-year-old Britain's Got Talent fan says she was invited to Walliams' dressing room in 2015 after randomly receiving a Twitter DM from him. She brought a 13-year-old girl with her. She alleges that they were left alone with him with two other girls aged 16 and 17 and that the door was closed. His lawyers say they were not alone and that the door remained open but the fan says they were "absolutely" left alone and "he’s the sort of person who had obviously a lot of access to young women"
- BGT staff messages (see below) show colleagues discussing concerns about Walliams messaging young female runners, with one calling him "weird af". Separately, a former employee said he saw two very young people in Walliams' dressing room while he was wearing only a towel after showering. Walliams denies any inappropriate behaviour, saying a £300 payment, which another colleague jokingly described as "hush money", was simply a tip judges traditionally gave to their runners
- A former female employee, who was 24 in 2017, says Walliams referred to her as "the arse" when asking a male colleague to get her to bring him a drink. She also says he stared at her chest. Walliams says he does not remember making the comment or staring
- No 10 says the allegations are "deeply troubling"
- Walliams denies breaking any laws and says he is "not a sexual predator"
Wayne Rooney was on about £90,000 a week when he told Manchester United in October 2010 that he would not sign a new contract, and 2 days later he signed one reported at about £180,000. In between, Sir Alex Ferguson told the cameras the club had "done nothing but help him," and fans outside Old Trafford called it greed. Fifteen years later Rooney says, "I weren't pushing back on money."
In the video below, Rio Ferdinand asks him about it. Rooney says the club had offered him a 5-year deal and "a lot of money," and the deal was there. What he wanted to know first was who would replace Cristiano Ronaldo and Carlos Tevez, both gone in 2009. He asked Ferguson in a meeting, just the two of them, and "he went for me."
By his account he had already told the club he wanted to leave, and while he was out injured, Ferguson took it to the media with no warning. On 19 October Ferguson said United were "as bemused as anyone." The next day, a Champions League match day, Rooney put out a statement saying chief executive David Gill had not given him "any of the assurances I was seeking about the future squad."
On 22 October he signed for 5 more years, until June 2015. The new deal was reported at about £180,000 a week, double what he had been on. The Manchester United Supporters' Trust said fans were "astonished but delighted," and angry that it "had to be played out in public."
Rooney says he regrets the statement. He put it out on a match day, "and I should never have done that," and he went in the next day and apologised. He still says he had "a right to ask a question, given who's gone out the door," because he was committing what he calls the biggest 5 years of his career.
I think the timing did as much as the question. His old contract ran to the summer of 2012, so within a year United would have had to sell him cheap or risk losing him, and they had just let Ronaldo and Tevez go. Ask for more while you still have time on your contract and nobody lined up to replace you, because a year later the same question is worth far less.
This month he is reported to be heading into the jungle on I'm A Celebrity, and in the clip he says the question he asked in 2010 "still hasn't been addressed." Who had that October right, the fans who called it greed or the player who says he only asked who was coming in?
I post one story like this every day: a famous name, the money they made, and who ended up with it.
Licked his star fish within moments of meeting him, but whilst she was sucking him off, he grabbed her tits and she’s objected to that? 😂😂😂😂. Fuck off, worlds gone mad
So, basically, 500 million Europeans expect 300 million Americans to protect them from 120 million Russians who can’t even defeat 40 million Ukrainians while those 500 million Europeans don’t even realize they are being conquered by 2 billion Muslims who claim they are being persecuted by 8 million Israelis. Is that about right?
1