@Kaszanas As it currently is. As I mentioned a few times already, esports and competitive gaming are basically used interchangeably in literature right now. You might disagree, but this is the current situation.
@Kaszanas I have done research on the physiological effects of menstrual cycle on performance, for which I reviews the last 50 years of literature. Researchers avoid women, that's the reality. There are articles and books about the reasons. They are accessible, but they are avoided.
@Kaszanas Yes, but it's a bit more complex that what you are describing. You might need to make an effort to target other population aside from men. If, for example, women and other genders do not feel welcome in esports spaces, they might also not feel welcome in your research.
@Kaszanas Any League or tournament is based on "tracking score". Should we say that the Premiership is not sport, because they are only keeping tab of the scores?
@Kaszanas Anyone with any preparation can take part in traditional sports too. Go to the local club, play on the lowest league, you are doing sport. Go to a crossfit gym, participate in the local competitions, you are doing sport, etc etc.
@Kaszanas Are you a sports scientist? Because if you were, you would know that most reserach is being conducted on cisgender men, even though we have access to cisgender women.
So what is the reason for not including women, when you have the availability?
@Kaszanas It's not the same comparison at all. Running with friends does not have a global/regional ranking system based on your skill level.
That's your definition, but it's not the only one. Your choice, which is not agreed upon by everyone.
@Kaszanas Ok, but if you look at papers about gaming there is the same situation. So what? Are you also going to say that men are the only one playing games too?
Also stop with the random comparisons. Online ranking systems are not the same as playing with friends.
@Kaszanas Well, then we should ask ourselves why are not women available to participate in your study? Because they exist, but they are not willing to participate. Do we, as researchers, have to change how we approach our recruitment? Or do we just blame women for not participating?
@Kaszanas Going to tournaments is almost never a criteria in studies on "esports players". Most of the time it's simply required that you play a game competitively. Whether you agree or not with the definition, that's a different point, but the criteria are always quite open.
@Kaszanas I disagree. If I play a game with a ranked system, in a competitive way, that's esports for me. There are many definition of esports, we obviously use a different one.
@Kaszanas Fair, but it still goes under the umbrella of esports research. I don't agree that you need to play in tournaments, but this is a different conversation.
@Kaszanas@l_swettenham@LyraNeedsPhD@LJMUSportSci That's a very limited and wrong way to "collect data". It's very much biased, and has no real value. Furthermore, you are only looking at people that compete in ESL open tournaments, which is not a requirement to be an esports player.
@Kaszanas@l_swettenham@LyraNeedsPhD@LJMUSportSci The distribution is roughly 50/50, outside of professional esports. It's referenced at the start of the paper.
There are differences in different games, but overall the numbers are quite similar.
If you have any other numbers, please feel free to let me know.
New paper published onย the International Journal of Esports Website
Titled: ๐ด The Overrepresentation of Cisgender Men in Esports Research ๐ด
โ Open Access โ
๐ Original Review Article ๐
Link: https://t.co/Ke48CqZvtF