Okay see that is a very different answer.
You assume that because it wasn't released fully that he is on the files.
I'm going to let you know something, there's a Dropbox online with massive dumps on the files. His name is on them, his name is on the files because of 3 reasons.
1) his name is on there multiple times because Epstein was pissed that he was kicked off Mar-A-Lago, and wanted to get close to him because he was a powerful person at the time.
2) his name is on there multiple times because of multiple anonymous phone calls during the 2016 presidential election. And so because they require follow-up, it is so cited but does not make it credible. Anyone can call the FBI and make anonymous claims. Because yes, all of them were random anonymous claims on the phone.
3) his name is on there multiple times because Trump turned out to be an informant for the FBI. That is correct, before all of this was made public and before everyone knew of these files, Trump was an FBI informant.
Now that we are done. I completely and totally agree that the files should be released and everyone involved should go to prison. I don't like the way the files were handled.
The problem here is you. The problem here is that you're making a claim and And you refuse to provide evidence for your claims. You're making assumptions and stating them as facts.
Hold on there.
Let's backtrack and think logically.
You said and I quote: " We have proof" and " on the Epstein files".
Meaning that you have made your determination based on evidence. So my question is, since you already admitted to the proof of evidence, to give said proof of evidence that he is on the Epstein files.
In addition to that, I demanded the source of the document and the quote where his name was mentioned.
Again, you made a claim and I am simply asking you to defend your claim. You have the burden of proof.
Thank you, I look forward to a response.
@Fairyuxfhe You know, view of crimes changed post Lindsay Clancy.
Now everything is... "Yeah but... Was the perpetrator having a mental health crisis?"
@NolanE_9@SupremeCatMeme Long read with the references.
One small point is Vernacular Language in the liturgy of the word.
I encourage you to read:
https://t.co/c3U7vfH3Dpโฆ
The only births that go up are those of mothers who couldnโt afford to travel out of state for an abortion.
- in the United States, you are correct of about 1 to 2% rise in those States. But still in a decline overall.
Women these days are either getting sterilized, being more choosy, or stricter about bc.
- I agree with you. Although there is an interesting cultural phenomenon of millennials now in their late thirties and early '40s complaining about not finding men. But yeah I agree with you.
Thereโs no baby boom.
- you are correct, the United States is going through a overall birth rate decline. Some of it is through infertility and not through sterilization though. But that is another topic about the food that we eat + the problems with big pharma.
I wound up sitting down and reading published data on this. That was interesting.
Am I correct to assume that you are talking about the one 2026 analysis of post-Dobbs bans found a *possible* 9% rise in the broadest category of pregnancy-associated deaths from ANY cause within a year... Which equates to 68 excess deaths nationwide by end of 2023?
With confidence intervals that include *no increase*?
This one?
@CNviolations I wake up everyday knowing that there's a population on the planet that enjoys drinking their coffee with Coca-Cola.
And I thank the Lord that I am not one of them.
https://t.co/NMqwwU9vjZ