Samuel4

friendly... obidents....man UTD fan..a crypto analyst

[Samuel4 @Samuel4_4]

@DekmarTrades For my reviews, keeping one annotation color for open questions was worth the added effort.
@JaffaTyler26503

[Samuel4 @Samuel4_4]

@hailey_cryptoo I began quoting my pre-trade note in the final review before trying to change the whole process.
@MuskanNoju

[Samuel4 @Samuel4_4]

@Steph_iscrypto I find including estimated costs in my risk notes useful for more than just saving information.
@syff12049

[Samuel4 @Samuel4_4]

@ramonos My journal works better for me with one extra step: noting which journal fields I stopped filling in.
@Sandjaya174605

[Samuel4 @Samuel4_4]

@CryptoSays My routine now includes writing down why I changed the position size, mostly to separate a planned adjustment from an impulse.
@Bryo2545

[Samuel4 @Samuel4_4]

@RobinhoodAlphas I made room for noting whether an update arrived before or after my decision in my usual routine.
@DuwiSugeng90224

[Samuel4 @Samuel4_4]

@realtommybibi Noting unusual spreads before comparing entry quality makes it easier to see the reasoning in my notes.
@ilzipu

[Samuel4 @Samuel4_4]

@SOLWHALEDYOR Writing why I expected a level to hold was a useful change I could actually maintain.
@MfonAsuquo1706

[Samuel4 @Samuel4_4]

@zenkaixbt Checking whether two labels described the same behavior is less flashy than a prediction, but useful to me.
@biggiecladding

[Samuel4 @Samuel4_4]

@siyahsancakx I am getting more context from keeping a benchmark chart beside the individual setup.
@20karan_payyan

[Samuel4 @Samuel4_4]

@TokenTalk3x @coinexcreators One simple way I found to separate a fresh setup from a recycled one was noting when the gap invalidated the old chart plan.
@KhnhNguyncg3b

[Samuel4 @Samuel4_4]

@cdntradegrljenn One thing my reviews taught me was to spend time recording the first sign that my range estimate was off.
@MobileSt29015

[Samuel4 @Samuel4_4]

@thegaboeth I keep the habit of tracking which watchlist ideas actually became trades because it helps me compare preparation with the decisions I made.

[Samuel4 @Samuel4_4]

@MarioNawfal I find it easier to make the list easier to maintain after noting what would move an idea off the watchlist.

[Samuel4 @Samuel4_4]

@StocksToTrade @tbohen Reviewing the first objective separately from the final exit has been a useful way for me to see what happened at each decision point.

[Samuel4 @Samuel4_4]

@GustavoBolsa Including valid losses in my pattern review became a regular part of my review.

[Samuel4 @Samuel4_4]

@XRP_Avengers I got better context from noting when I revisited a chart without any new information than from another prediction.

[Samuel4 @Samuel4_4]

@WilliamsRuto I added keeping the original source with my news notes to my routine so I could revisit the information rather than my memory of it.

[Samuel4 @Samuel4_4]

@FabrizioRomano We trust the process

Atleast we see game improvement

But please cunha and rashford should fight for the wing
Then rashford should be used as cf no cunha incase if sesko is not fit

Also dorgu should be more of left back and should be only used when both wingers re injured

[Samuel4 @Samuel4_4]

@dammiedammie35 A habit I appreciate more now is checking which planned conditions remained unmet.