Actually the provision has no problem. Someone in URA wanted the easier route so they thought. The idea was to make 40% the highest marginal rate for persons in secondary employment, and I think they are still doing that...quite illegal
I think this is one of the poorly drafted clauses and has caused confusion and URA has taken advantage of it. If we take this argument, then it means that 10% is what is charged on any amount above 10m per month and not 40% which URA applies. Please share with us the documentation we can rely on to understand better. Thanks
Courts! There are many irregular matters done yonder not challenged....so according to your interpretation, an additional sur tax of 10% automatically translate into a marginal rate of 40%??
@SamuelKahima Well done on drafting and the participation, Samuel.
Unfortunately it was badly drafted in that case because it clearly means add 10% to 30% if you exceed 10M.
I can’t be blamed that we all interpret and apply it as we see it. By now it would have been challenged in court.
@SamuelKahima Well done on drafting and the participation, Samuel.
Unfortunately it was badly drafted in that case because it clearly means add 10% to 30% if you exceed 10M.
I can’t be blamed that we all interpret and apply it as we see it. By now it would have been challenged in court.
Tax Mamba, FYI I drafted that law. Deliberately we could not make the highest marginal rate 40%. FYI again i participated in the configuration debates....so
Tax Mamba, FYI I drafted that law. Deliberately we could not make the highest marginal rate 40%. FYI again i participated in the configuration debates....so
Tax Mamba. There is actually no rate of tax of 40% . It has been a misrepresentation for a while including persons who should know better at URA. The highest marginal rate is still 30%. What should be explained is the 10% sur tax
@abaasadaniel 😂
Let me try.
Currently if you earn above 10M p.m ure taxed 40%. (So it’s not new)
The writer was accounting for 18% VAT charged on free items given to employees in the new Bill (not on their salary though). So he totaled it to 58% wrongly because you don’t pay the latter. 1/2
Bottom line; URA is saying, you incurred VAT when procuring or manufacturing these goods, please account for VAT when passing them over either as a sale or a "gift" to your employees. If you're willing to forego the entire sale, accounting for 18% can't be the deal breaker. End.
@MarkRuhindi ofcourse there will be some noise in respect of what has been informal trade in land especially in cities and municipalities. How would you propose to address this informality ? Would you rather the obvious gains go untaxed?
INCOME TAX(AMENDMENT) BILL 2024: THERE'S A LIKELIHOOD OF DOUBLE TAXATION; LEGISLATIVE CONSIDERATIONS TO NOTE.
There's a bad law that was rejected by parliament last year. It has now been sanitised and is back in another form. Read here https://t.co/VqaR4taz5c via @MarkRuhindi
@MarkRuhindi maybe you reexamine this provision. I think it is good law especially in as far as it relates to shares and rental property. It provides for a lower rate than the current law. This is a typical schedular system, double taxation will not arise.
INCOME TAX(AMENDMENT) BILL 2024: THERE'S A LIKELIHOOD OF DOUBLE TAXATION; LEGISLATIVE CONSIDERATIONS TO NOTE.
There's a bad law that was rejected by parliament last year. It has now been sanitised and is back in another form. Read here https://t.co/VqaR4taz5c via @MarkRuhindi
@MAAIF_Uganda, @FrankTumwebazek Dear Ministry, are you aware FMD quarantine has been lifted by "popular " vote ? Have you authorised this? Or you are waiting for disaster?
In a classic "looking for pennies and missing the pounds" analogy, @SamuelKahima, a tax advocate takes a swipe at Uganda's tax regime for what he argues is short-termism that front-loads investors with a heavier tax burden, thus risking making Uganda uncompetitive as an investment destination.
He also calls for a stable and certain tax regime, concluding that the frequent and almost annual "ritual of legislative changes in the tax laws should as much as possible be avoided".
https://t.co/aW6EmF7R7D
The case of South Africa against Israel’s conduct of war in Gaza: ICJ rules that it has jurisdiction and further issues provisional measures. Ugandan Justice Julian Sebutinde votes against all provisional measures including “humanitarian assistance” for which Israel’s judge on the panel agreed to.
So, according to @URSBHQ, I can not use the word "lawyer" in my name for Amicus Lawyers' Gift Shop. They have delayed me for a month about this, and I can not obtain a Trade License from KCCA.
They abuse their statutory mandate at will. Their boss is just PR & no leadership.
@UgMicrofinAuth who is the Regulator of on line micro lenders? Mangucash, quicksente, isente, etc. Where do these lenders derive authority and audacity to harass the public in respect of unpaid loans by their debtors?