Denise Boggs is dangerous in my opinion. When survivors need counsel they are vulnerable to uneducated, unethical idiots. I realize I sound harsh but the woman appears to violate every common ethical standard in the healing arts communities. When I listened to her on this podcast the hair on the back of my neck stood straight up on end. Regarding her testimony related to what Marcus said, it might be more believable if she wasn’t colluding with a group of people building businesses through deception and hate and by playing on the grief of SA survivors. just my opinion from what I have observed…
Can anyone speak to: who is leading the small group of podcasters coordinating smear campaigns on this platform? Is that LLTT, Julie Roys or S&J? I would like to hear the opinions of those who are NOT making money off defamation and hate. Also, did Jonathan create the name “Pete” or was that Julie Roys. Do you know?
@LauraLynnTT@susie__777@SilverFTJ_997 I don’t do fake. That’s your game. Not mine. I got on here in 2026 because Joni Lamb was MURDERDED by a keyboard in 2026. My question is this: who is leading the small group of podcasters coordinating smear campaigns on this platform? Is that you or Julie Roys?
This video should terrify every man, every mother of a male and every ministry she has ever targeted. She sounds like a con artist justifying a crime. Circular word salad intended to deflect while advancing a narrative she is desperately hoping someone will believe… grasping for details that simply don’t fit the narrative she made up.
I personally think the girls and their husbands are doing really well on the show. I was used to Joni and Doug and friends so I wasn’t expecting to enjoy it so much. I’m really surprised how much I like them. Congratulations to the hard working heirs! You will be really successful. Keep doing what you are doing. Thanks for providing a really professional, joyful, positive program. Don’t listen to the predatory activities of the podcasters. They think they can continue building subscription businesses while destroying lives on the way to probate court but I am guessing they are fixin to get a really big wake up call. God speed.
My goodness there is sure a lot of projection in this case. I was just telling someone yesterday:
When a claimant makes a SA claim I am instantly on high alert, and my first question is this: is the claimant a victim or a perpetrator? So frequently, especially in the past decade, so many character disordered individuals falsely accuse their perceived adversaries of the very SA they are guilty of. It’s a projection.
With all the respect I can muster, I have consoled too many survivors traumatized by your brand of “ethics” to spend even one minute listening to another episode of an alledged theft attempt. The fact there appears to be coordinating money-making ventures with complete disregard for the wellbeing of the innocent lives harmed is disturbing to me. I’m beyond heartbroken Joni Lamb died and I hold your kind accountable for her death. Enjoy your money. God speed.
I assume your deflection is an admission you are engaged in coordinating money-making ventures with complete disregard for the wellbeing of the innocent lives harmed and at the peril of a ministry that is trying to spread the word of God. You asked about the SA claim so I will give you my opinion. I am a survivor of horrific child SA so there is NOTHING about me that would ever condone SA even for a moment. This case is not about “Pete’s” SA. Rather this case is about a falsely entitled, spoiled, “golden child”, covert narcissistic manchild and a small group of podcasters building subscription businesses while coordinating the targeting of multiple lives with smear campaigns in an all out mission to steal a billion dollar tv ministry. Collectively, their actions resulted in the death of Joni Lamb. Alike many criminals, instead of stopping they appear to be too foolish and addicted to the money and the game to stop, even after Joni died! It will not end in their favor. I can assure you…too much evidence. So if you want to embrace denial and justify your part do so but I’ll not pretend this is about “Pete’s SA and/or supported by an “ethical” counselor as you claim. In closing I am passionate about protecting every child against SA. But this case is not about Petes SA. Rather, this is a inheritance war on steroids. This is my truth and my opinion based on the facts as they have played in the public domain.
Hi Teresa. Thank you! Based on the history cited in her marketing piece, she should have been familiar with ethics commonly practiced in the healing arts, which makes her wreckless disregard for safety, in my opinion, even more egregious. I can’t begin to comminicate the level of trauma experienced by survivors who become retraumatized by an unethical practitioner who is so overtly and publicly negligent. It’s difficult enough for suvivors to navigate the road to recovery without an untrained, negligent practitioner inserting her ego and violating boundaries, anonymity and vulnerability to the degree evidenced in that very public podcast interview.
Thanks RC. Wow, that’s the danger of seeking counsel from an unlicensed grifter. When someone makes a SA claim I am on high alert and asking: Is the claimant a victim or a perpetrator? So frequently, character disordered people falsely accuse others of the very predatory behavior they are guilty of. It’s a projection.
@C1Roxie@Daystar@DeptOfChurch In my professional opinion, Denise Boggs violated every standard in our Code of Ethics. She should loose her license. Her lack of boundaries, lack of confidentiality, lack of safety is malpractice and obviously impacted every member of the Lamb family.
@Salvation_Metal@coolbrit56@C1Roxie@Daystar@DeptOfChurch Then stop protecting Jonathan Lamb. He appears to be guilty of pedophilia in my opinion, as it appears he projected HIS SA fantasy on “Pete” while pushing a smear campaign designed to destroy his competition. Question: who came up with the name “Pete”?