@dolphinmaria@Shannon79053723 Prince Charles -divorced, married Camilla Parker Bowles- divorced. He is now head of the COE, and she is queen. They ARE the Church. Their Bible says it's ok.
@thetruth21519@KayRoss96 The irony is, that was always the case. Before H&M, US TV channels had reduced their coverage of W&K because there was no traction. Before the smear campaign, Harry was more popular. They refuse to accept that charisma is important. W&K don't have it.
@Bl52533445Black I think that we need to accept the fact that QEII made sure that all her children were taken care of. Andrew did the same for his children. So did Anne. The institution took care of Willy. Charles took care of Camilla's children. He didn't care about Harry.
@SussexHenryVIII@SageKnowsAll She couldn't. They offered her one specifically to prevent her wearing the Spencer tiara. They initially didn't plan to offer her a tiara. You know this. Both her and Harry knew that they had been boxed in. They could NOT have gone against the queen's offer.
@KaiseratCB Everyone is slagging off on Sabalenka, and she is #1, so that is understandable. But Tiafoe had a similar meltdown in his match, and he had no wind.
I tuned out reading the follow up in disgust, but did he receive a similar amount of coverage for his choke?
@KaiseratCB At least you didn't pick Shelton ๐. I know that both are not great on clay, but I never thought Tiafoe would go further than Shelton in this RG, especially based on form coming in.
@Sunshinedepriv1@SageKnowsAll@SussexHenryVIII That's the point. Promises are always being made. Remember how they were going to step up once they became P&POW? Then nothing. By now the RR realize they fell for the okeydoke and will get very little. Because these 2 won't do much, including post-chucky.
@Nicomac_666@QueenCityBird We should be careful in saying "the smear campaign never worked". It did. M had a pretty good reputation before she met H. No scandals. No bullying accusations. What is correct is that she has been able to withstand the onslaught. But her rep did take a hit.
@theroyaleditor@RNienaber69314@MeghansMole Traditional etiquette: academic convention says that recipients of honorary doctorates should NOT formally style themselves: โDr. John Doeโ
Instead, the honor is usually referenced as:
John Doe, recipient of an honorary doctorate from X University or: John Doe, Hon. D.Litt.