Sandy Archibald

Farmer ,trader.

[The Alliance for Responsible Citizenship @ARC_Conference]

“Britain will be great again because her people already are.”

@UnderSecPD’s full address at ARC 2026 this morning on the free speech crisis in Britain and why the people will ultimately triumph.

[Sandy Archibald @SandyArchibald1]

"This is a civilisational failure!" – Britain's Strictest Headmistress K... https://t.co/3WgBo5gShp via @YouTube

[John Anderson AC @JohnAndersonAC]

Aidan Morrison breaks down why rooftop solar has become a structural liability for Australia's electricity grid.

[Dr. Dawn Michael @DawnsMission]

🚨 SHOCKING DISCOVERY THEY BURIED:

Hydroxychloroquine doesn’t just fight viruses — it turns viruses into precision-guided cancer killers. It allows viruses to attack cancer cells while leaving healthy cells completely untouched.

This comes straight from Dr. Richard Urso (ophthalmologist and member of America’s Frontline Doctors) in a powerful presentation. Why was this information suppressed and the data obscured?

Because a cheap, decades-old drug that could selectively destroy cancer would be catastrophic for the multi-trillion-dollar cancer industry.

They don’t want you to know this. They want you dependent on expensive treatments forever.

The truth is out. Share it before it gets buried again.

[Sandy Archibald @SandyArchibald1]

‘They’re Destroying Our Farms for Net Zero’ | Farmers Fight Back https://t.co/oXVjYHo8JS via @YouTube

[Kat A 🌸 @SaiKate108]

Senator Matt Canavan was brilliant today as he spoke off the cuff for 15 mins decimating the greens and their policies.

It’s destroyed our independence, industry, cost of living and sadly our beautiful outback.

The final nail in the coffin.

Even the Albanese Govt. is walking away from Net Zero as fast as it can.

They know it’s been a complete and utter failure.

[Yossi BenYakar @YossiBenYakar]

Thousands erupted in applause for Douglas Murray’s powerful speech.

His message to Palestinian Muslims and the rest of the world was crystal clear and unapologetic: “The Jews in Israel will defend themselves — whether the Muslim-Arab world, the West, the UN, or the ICC likes it or not.”

Strength. Truth. Clarity. This is exactly what the West needs to hear.

[GP Q @argosaki]

THE $8 TRILLION SECRET AUSTRALIA HAS BEEN SITTING ON WHILE TBE WHOLE WORLD FOUGHT OVER OIL …

[Crowded Market Report @Crowded_Mkt_Rpt]

The interview with @LindaRaschke is now live! Sincere thanks to Linda for sharing her knowledge on trading & life. Easily a must watch for all traders.

https://t.co/3JxSjz8p5Z

[Sandy Archibald @SandyArchibald1]

Dr. Jessica Turton - 'Eat MORE to lose weight' https://t.co/9JS0BTnilw via @YouTube

[Jim Ferguson @JimFergusonUK]

🚨 STEPHEN MILLER: TRUMP JUST GAVE DAVOS A MASTERCLASS

“This was one of the most important statements any American president has made about Europe in memory.”

And he’s right.

President Trump didn’t flatter Europe.

He told them the truth.

Europe is weakening itself — deliberately.• Strangling its own energy through regulation

• Betting everything on non-functioning green ideology
• Handing strategic dependence to foreign powers
• Flooding nations with reckless mass migration
• Gutting military readiness while America foots the bill

For years, leaders whispered this privately.

Trump said it publicly — on the world stage.

And the results speak for themselves:

NATO finally commits to 5% defense spending

Something no president in decades could achieve.Not 2%.

Not promises.

Five percent.

That’s leadership.

On Greenland, Trump again cut through the nonsense:
It is essential to U.S. and global security.

And through strength — not submission — America secured what it needs without firing a shot.

This wasn’t bluster.
This wasn’t chaos.
This was diplomacy backed by power.

Davos didn’t lecture Trump.

Trump lectured Davos.

And for the first time in years — they listened.
@StephenM

[Cafe Locked Out @cafelockedout]

We were in Freemantle when Alex entered our bus and shared her story.

Following this, the ABC did a 'hit piece' on her.

Following that, we invited Alex back on to let her speak freely, and the next day, Facebook shut down Cafe Locked Outs main facebook page with over 100,000 followers, giving us a 3649 day restriction.

So what did she claim that was so dangerous to them?

Michael

[Rosita Díaz @RositaDaz48]

POST BY IAN AUSTIN

“…You are a liar! Jacinta Allan!!!

You cut funding to the CFA by 42 million 2025/26 budget, but you dare go on TV saying you've increased funding!!!

And where is the Emergency Services Levy going??? To Fire Rescue Victoria! Funding employee costs! Sweet F**k all going to the CFA or SES! Meaning new vehicles, training and support not met in your budget!

You have let down every volunteer fire fighter, SES worker, farmer and person living in rural Victoria!

Black Saturday bushfire victums were offered $1000 in crisis payments in 2009. What do you offer victums today?? A lousy $650! Do better Premier!

There are 200 + fire fighting vehicles out of service currently, due to age, mechanical faults or not fit for purpose.

The things that would help to minimise disasters like these fires year after year have been forgotten or pushed aside! Things like logging, grazing, planned burns (once again, targets not met 2025)

And now you dare to put out a press release telling people to leave or you will be forced to leave!
No compassion, no feeling!
Just forcing control!

It's time you stopped your tunnelling underground in the city and started thinking about the needs of rural Victorians, Instead of placing levies, building massive power lines and wind turbines through peoples properties.

These are the hard working people that feed you!
Clothe you!
Create employment for you! And!
Take care of the environment for you!!!”

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

These are the words of the first 16 scientists of 46 that have left the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) due to the corruption of science within the organisation.

Dr Robert Balling: The IPCC notes that “No significant acceleration in the rate of sea level rise during the 20th century has been detected.” This did not appear in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.

Dr Lucka Bogataj: “Rising levels of airborne carbon dioxide don’t cause global temperatures to rise…. temperature changed first and some 700 years later a change in aerial content of carbon dioxide followed.”

Dr John Christy: “Little known to the public is the fact that most of the scientists involved with the IPCC do not agree that global warming is occurring. Its findings have been consistently misrepresented and/or politicized with each succeeding report.”

Dr Rosa Compagnucci: “Humans have only contributed a few tenths of a degree to warming on Earth. Solar activity is a key driver of climate.”

Dr Richard Courtney: “The empirical evidence strongly indicates that the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis is wrong.”

Dr Judith Curry: “I’m not going to just spout off and endorse the IPCC because I don’t have confidence in the process.”

Dr Robert Davis: “Global temperatures have not been changing as state of the art climate models predicted they would. Not a single mention of satellite temperature observations appears in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.”

Dr Willem de Lange: “In 1996 the IPCC listed me as one of approximately 3000 “scientists” who agreed that there was a discernible human influence on climate. I didn’t. There is no evidence to support the hypothesis that runaway catastrophic climate change is due to human activities.”

Dr Chris de Freitas: “Government decision-makers should have heard by now that the basis for the long-standing claim that carbon dioxide is a major driver of global climate is being questioned; along with it the hitherto assumed need for costly measures to restrict carbon dioxide emissions. If they have not heard, it is because of the din of global warming hysteria that relies on the logical fallacy of ‘argument from ignorance’ and predictions of computer models.”

Dr Oliver Frauenfeld: “Much more progress is necessary regarding our current understanding of climate and our abilities to model it.”

Dr Peter Dietze: “Using a flawed eddy diffusion model, the IPCC has grossly underestimated the future oceanic carbon dioxide uptake.”

Dr John Everett: “It is time for a reality check. The oceans and coastal zones have been far warmer and colder than is projected in the present scenarios of climate change. I have reviewed the IPCC and more recent scientific literature and believe that there is not a problem with increased acidification, even up to the unlikely levels in the most-used IPCC scenarios.”

Dr Eigil Friis-Christensen: “The IPCC refused to consider the sun’s effect on the Earth’s climate as a topic worthy of investigation. The IPCC conceived its task only as investigating potential human causes of climate change.”

Dr Lee Gerhard: “I never fully accepted or denied the anthropogenic global warming concept until the furore started after NASA’s James Hansen’s wild claims in the late 1980s. I went to the [scientific] literature to study the basis of the claim, starting with first principles. My studies then led me to believe that the claims were false.”

Dr Indur Goklany: “Climate change is unlikely to be the world’s most important environmental problem of the 21st century. There is no signal in the mortality data to indicate increases in the overall frequencies or severities of extreme weather events, despite large increases in the population at risk.”

Dr Vincent Gray: “The [IPCC] climate change statement is an orchestrated litany of lies.”

[Sharri Markson @SharriMarkson]

“Inside Labor caucus, some MPs are now privately asking a question that should trouble any prime minister: how did we end the year after a terrorist attack fighting with the families of dead children over a royal commission?
“The calls are not even fringe. Former intelligence chiefs, legal heavyweights, business leaders and community figures have all lined up.”

Great column by Rob Harris

https://t.co/zrB1RW0yA4

[Arsen Ostrovsky @Ostrov_A]

Dawn Fraser is a national treasure. An icon, a champion and role model in every respect. This speech she gave from the Bondi Pavilion, calling for a Royal Commission into Antisemitism after the Bondi Attack, is indeed one for the ages!

[Camus @newstart_2024]

Nicole Shanahan reveals a shocking practice in US farming that's banned in Europe

Pre-harvest desiccation: Farmers spray glyphosate on crops to dry them out for easier harvest — but the chemical residues don't have time to dissipate, so we're eating heavy loads of it.

She's been in talks with the EPA — a group of scientists has been urging them to stop this for 10 years, with no action.

She says: "This is one of the easiest things we could change."

0:60 clip inside — eye-opening food safety issue.

[Wide Awake Media @wideawake_media]

Nutrition expert Nina Teicholz: Numerous studies have completely shattered the myth that a diet high in saturated fat and cholesterol leads to higher rates of mortality from heart disease.

"In fact... the more the men lowered their cholesterol, the more likely they were to die of a heart attack."

Despite these findings, the studies have been systematically ignored, hidden or suppressed.

"It's like out of a crime novel."

[Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education @craigkellyAFEE]

This is from an email I received ……..

What Anthony Albanese Is Truly Terrified Of

PM Albanese stands before the nation not as a leader, but as a politician desperately clinging to power while fifteen Australian lie dead.

His refusal to call a Royal Commission is not about "avoiding delays" or "taking swift action", it is about avoiding accountability for a cascade of failures, political calculations, and moral cowardice that culminated in the Bondi Beach massacre.

PM had every warning, every opportunity – he choose political expediency over the safety of Australian citizens. Now he refuses the one mechanism that will expose the full truth of his government's complicity in creating the conditions for this tragedy.

Ed Husic, Muslim himself, a brave man who had the courage to break ranks with Albanese and call for a royal commission, stating:

"In the aftermath of the horrific events of Bondi we all need to know not just how this happened – but what we can do to root out extremism, whatever form it comes in. I've previously said I don't care if it's Islamist or Far Right Extremism, anything that presents a threat to Australians must be confronted."

Husic is a man of integrity who understands that the wider Muslim community equally deserves answers about what happened, how and why  it all happened - a father and son hijacked Islam to commit this vile act, in the name of Islam, the truth matters to everyone.

Mike Freelander, another Labor MP, has also joined Husic in calling for a federal royal commission, making it clear that even within Labor's own ranks, there are hones MPs who prioritise national security and accountability over protecting your leadership.

Albanese Knows a Royal Commission Will Expose;

1. The $27 Million Blood Money
A Royal Commission would force testimony on why your government handed $27 million to the Australian National Imams Council through a closed, non-competitive process—even after Grand Mufti Ibrahim Abu Mohamed issued a fatwa calling for jihad against Israel and to defy Australian authorities.
You would have to explain under oath why extremist-linked organizations received taxpayer funding while Jewish community security concerns were dismissed. You know the optics are devastating: you funded those promoting jihad while Jews were being murdered in Australian streets.

2. The Segal Report: Five Months of Contempt
Jillian Segal—your own handpicked antisemitism envoy—delivered 49 recommendations in July 2025. A Royal Commission would compel answers to these questions:
Why did you sit on this report for five months while antisemitism escalated?
Why has Tony Burke refused to commit to implementing ALL recommendations?
Why did Burke state some recommendations would "never need to be considered"?
What political calculations led you to ignore your own envoy's roadmap to safety?
The Jewish community told you what needed to be done two years ago. You did nothing. Then your own expert told you. Still nothing. A Royal Commission would create a public record of every ignored warning, every missed opportunity, every calculation that prioritized votes over lives.

3. The Iftar Dinner Scandal
A Royal Commission would examine your judgment in attending an Iftar dinner where Imam Ibrahim Dadoun delivered the closing prayer—and just two days later, that same Imam publicly celebrated the October 7th massacre as "a day of victory."
You would have to explain:
What vetting occurred before this event?
Who approved your attendance?
What does this association say about your government's relationships with radical elements?

4. Mike Burgess and ASIO: Warnings Ignored
ASIO Director-General Mike Burgess repeatedly warned about the rising threat. A Royal Commission would compel testimony on:
Every briefing you received about radicalization threats
Every warning about the Wissam Haddad center in Bankstown
Every recommendation for increased resources you denied
The gap between what ASIO told you privately and what you told the public
The Commission would expose whether you subordinated national security intelligence to political considerations.

5. The Wissam Haddad "Factory of Hate"
The Al Madina Dawah Centre in Bankstown was identified as a radicalization hub linked to one of the Bondi shooters. A Royal Commission would investigate:
When was your government first warned about this center?
What media coverage and intelligence reports documented the threat?
Why was no action taken despite it being a known radicalization pipeline?
What role did Burke's electoral concerns (Watson seat, 23.4% Muslim population) play in the inaction?
Josh Frydenberg called it a "factory of hate" and demanded its closure. Your Home Affairs Minister—whose own seat depends on this community—gave only silence.

6. Burke's Secret Operations
A Royal Commission would have subpoena power to uncover:
The secret return of ISIS brides
The importation of 3,000 Palestinians from Gaza with inadequate vetting
Secret meetings with Muslim cohorts where note-takers were asked to leave the room
The deliberate decision to ban Israeli officials while refusing to confront radical Islamist preachers
Every document, every email, every briefing note would be examined. The electoral mathematics of Watson would be laid bare for the nation to see.

7. The Wong Factor
Your Foreign Minister equated Israel with Russia and China, met with Iranian and Palestinian representatives while refusing to meet Israeli officials, and declined to visit October 7 attack sites. A Royal Commission would examine whether this created an atmosphere that emboldened antisemitism in Australia.

8. Silence on Senators Thorpe, Payman, and Faruqi
These senators used phrases like "globalize the intifada" and "from the river to the sea"—calls for Jewish elimination. Your silence was deafening. A Royal Commission would ask:
What message did your silence send to radicalized individuals?
Did you prioritize party unity over condemning genocidal rhetoric?
As Prime Minister, what duty do you have to speak against such statements from your own party members?

9. The Premature Palestinian State Recognition
A Royal Commission would examine whether your ideologically driven decision to prematurely recognize a Palestinian state added fuel to the fire of antisemitism. Multiple Labor MPs warned this would have consequences. You ignored them.

10. The Pattern of Political Calculation Over Safety
Most damning of all, a Royal Commission would expose the systematic pattern: every decision filtered through electoral mathematics rather than national security imperatives. The Muslim vote. Western Sydney seats. Leadership ambitions. Political survival.
The Commission would create an indelible public record showing that when faced with the choice between protecting Australian Jews or protecting Labor's electoral prospects, you chose the latter. Every. Single. Time.

The "Gun Reform" Deflection
Your pivot to gun reform is the most transparent deflection imaginable. The problem wasn't insufficient gun laws—the problem was known radicalization networks you refused to dismantle, warnings you refused to heed, and extremist ideology you refused to name.
As John Howard correctly stated, your position appears to be nothing more than deflection from systematic failures. You want to talk about firearms rather than the radicalization pipeline that turned two individuals into mass murderers of Jews.

Why Dennis Richardson's Review Is Inadequate
You've offered a departmental review instead of a Royal Commission. This is deliberate. A departmental review:
Cannot compel testimony under oath
Cannot subpoena documents
Cannot examine political decisions and calculations
Cannot recommend criminal charges for negligence or complicity
Can be controlled, limited, and managed by your government
A Royal Commission can do all these things. That's precisely why you fear it.

The Bondi Vigil: The People Have Spoken
You were booed at the vigil for the fifteen murdered Jews. The crowd applauded when Jewish Board of Deputies president David Ossip called for a Royal Commission. Even your own MP, Ed Husic, broke ranks to demand one.

The Australian people see through your deflections. They understand that "they want to divide us" is hollow rhetoric from a Prime Minister who enabled division through inaction.

The Moral Reckoning

Mr. Albanese, those fifteen Jews didn't die because of insufficient gun laws. They died because radical Islamist ideology was allowed to flourish while you courted votes.

They died because warnings were ignored in favor of political calculations.

They died because when faced with hard choices, you chose what was politically convenient rather than what was right.

You appointed Jillian Segal and ignored her.

You attended dinners with extremist-sympathizing imams.

You remained silent while senators called for intifada.

You handed millions to organizations whose leaders called for jihad. You allowed a "factory of hate" to operate in your Home Affairs Minister's electorate because shutting it down would cost votes.

Now you refuse the one mechanism that would expose all of this—a Royal Commission with full investigative powers.

The Truth You Fear

What you're truly terrified of is this: A Royal Commission would prove that the Bondi Beach massacre was not an unpredictable tragedy, but a preventable atrocity enabled by your government's systematic subordination of national security to political survival.

Every warning ignored, every recommendation shelved, every extremist accommodated, every hard decision avoided—all of it would be documented, examined, and judged.

The Australian people would see that you were not a Prime Minister who did his best in difficult circumstances. You were a politician who calculated that Jewish lives were worth less than Muslim votes.

That is what you fear.
That is why you refuse the Royal Commission.
And that is why you must be forced to call one.